Jump to content

The Walls be Closing


Kemp

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Godwins law states that 

 

"if you mention Adolf Hitler or Nazis within a discussion thread, you've automatically ended whatever discussion you were taking part in."

 

A law that states that as the length of a *thread proceeds on a *newsgroup the probability of a comparison with Hitler or the Nazis approaches one. A number of groups have the tradition that when this happens the discussion is regarded as over

 

 

 

Thanks for your contribution.

By the way, this is Godwin's Law:

Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies)[1] is a saying made by Mike Godwin in 1990.[2] The law states: "As a discussion on the Internet grows longer, the likelihood of a person/s being compared to Hitler or another Nazi, increases."[3][2] That means that as more people talk on the Internet for a longer time, it becomes more and more likely that someone will talk about Hitler or the Nazis.

Edited by Kemp
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris farley said:

"if you mention Adolf Hitler or Nazis within a discussion thread, you've automatically ended whatever discussion you were taking part in."

And killed any integrity they thought they had.

 

Whoosh

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

And killed any integrity one thought they had.

 

Whoosh

 

 

 

 

 

A Trump fan extolling integrity is good stuff.

It's no wonder that I always view you as one of the least bright of your brethren.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is this the comment that revokes Trump's bail or will this result in his final warning?

Edited by Kemp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

The same thing that Hitler being so popular in Germany tells me.

 

Your first sentence sounds like a Russian bot, by the way.

 

 

 

Hitler also was a big fan of government death squads too

 

I was just trying to speak in a language that you guys on the left could better understand 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Doc said:

 

No chance he loses to Joke and Kammy again.  There is no "I'll shut down the Wuhan virus" and "Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo" lies to sell.

Hoax.  You forgot the “Joe and Kamala aren’t his nonsense” argument and votes.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

Hitler also was a big fan of government death squads too

 

I was just trying to speak in a language that you guys on the left could better understand 

 

The point was that when people join a cult, measuring how many people are in it, doesn't change the fact that it's a cult.

The more people in a cult, the more danger to the norms of the society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

The point was that when people join a cult, measuring how many people are in it, doesn't change the fact that it's a cult.

The more people in a cult, the more danger to the norms of the society.

So, try to break free. 

 

understand its hard at first.  but you got this.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

The point was that when people join a cult, measuring how many people are in it, doesn't change the fact that it's a cult.

The more people in a cult, the more danger to the norms of the society.

 

 

That type of inflammatory rhetoric gets you nowhere, billstime jr

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

So, try to break free. 

 

understand its hard at first.  but you got this.

 

 

 

Now, you're demonstrating that you don't know what a cult is.

You are the most doltish on your team, which is no easy feat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

Now, you're demonstrating that you don't know what a cult is.

You are the most doltish on your team, which is no easy feat.

There are no teams. just individuals with their own views.

 

unless one is outing themselves as a troll farm or something.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

There are no teams. just individuals with their own views.

 

unless one is outing themselves as a troll farm or something.

 

 

 

Being a member of a cult isn't being a member of a team?

A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader,[1] is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a leader by a government, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.

I'm trying to explain things to a person who posted a law that he has proven is inaccurate.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

Being a member of a cult isn't being a member of a team?

A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader,[1] is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a leader by a government, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.

I'm trying to explain things to a person who posted a law that he has proven is inaccurate.

Continue with that narrative. It at no time will sound like projection and gaslighting on your part.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Continue with that narrative. It at no time will sound like projection and gaslighting on your part.

 

 

 

I don't worship at the feet of any man.

That's what Trumpers do, no matter what evidence comes out.

Keep kissing his ass.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kemp said:

Being a member of a cult isn't being a member of a team?

A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader,[1] is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a leader by a government, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.

I'm trying to explain things to a person who posted a law that he has proven is inaccurate.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...