Jump to content

Another Republican…


Recommended Posts

My reaction was in the Lincoln Project thread. Leave there and reply to it there.  That whole thread is about a bunch of groomers that you seen to love, Slime.

Edited by Wacka
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

“Rudy put his hand under my blazer, then my skirt. I feel his frozen fingers trail up my thigh. He tilts his chin up. My eyes dart to John Eastman, who flashes a leering grin.”

Same lady that pulled the hearsay in the hearings?

 

She didn't feel the need to call the cops but will tell it all in a very profitable book.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Same lady that pulled the hearsay in the hearings?

 

She didn't feel the need to call the cops but will tell it all in a very profitable book.

 

 

 

She showed up and was under oath.

 

If you have countering info - bring it, Chris.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/20/2023 at 9:31 AM, Tommy Callahan said:

Same lady that pulled the hearsay in the hearings?

 

She didn't feel the need to call the cops but will tell it all in a very profitable book.

 

 

I also do not agree with us. I don’t think that these things should be called out whenever it’s convenient.
 

Well, let’s keep in mind that a lot of this stuff is brought out into the open a long time after it actually happens there is feelings of guilt, even of responsibility or loyalty

 

It’s not that she should not be believed, but it should be questioned that it came out right before it was time to write a book and gain profit

On 10/8/2023 at 3:09 PM, BillStime said:

Party of fn pigs 

 

 

It’s not the gym. Jordan is not a absolute ***** pig, but I think it’s best to keep the details of everything on the up and up.
 

I have not heard any information that Jordan was a molester himself, but he definitely was helping a molester by both, not protecting the kids whenever they were telling him of the issues, and then going on further to try to keep them from filing lawsuits against the guy that was actually doing it he went out of his way to not let this come to light 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I also do not agree with us. I don’t think that these things should be called out whenever it’s convenient.
 

Well, let’s keep in mind that a lot of this stuff is brought out into the open a long time after it actually happens there is feelings of guilt, even of responsibility or loyalty

 

It’s not that she should not be believed, but it should be questioned that it came out right before it was time to write a book and gain profit

It’s not the gym. Jordan is not a absolute ***** pig, but I think it’s best to keep the details of everything on the up and up.
 

I have not heard any information that Jordan was a molester himself, but he definitely was helping a molester by both, not protecting the kids whenever they were telling him of the issues, and then going on further to try to keep them from filing lawsuits against the guy that was actually doing it he went out of his way to not let this come to light 

Why hearsay shouldn't be trusted in court as evidence. It's just a story that can't be confirmed or denied. Same with book stories.  

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Why hearsay was never trusted in court as evidence. It's just a story that can't be confirmed or denied. Same with book stories.  

 

Let's see - she was under oath. 

 

Why did team MAGA obstruct and fight subpoenas? They could have set the record straight.

 

They didn't - so, shut the @#$@# up.

 

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Let's see - she was under oath. 

 

Why did team MAGA obstruct and fight subpoenas? They could have set the record straight.

 

They didn't - so, shut the @#$@# up.

 

 

 

Cause it was a story.

 

And why actual courts don't allow hearsay as evidence

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

Cause it was a story.

 

And why actual courts don't allow hearsay as evidence

 

 

 

Awe, too damn bad.

 

You gotta love these idiots constantly trying to move the goal posts when they can't defend what happened that day and all of the obstruction that followed.

 

THIS WASN'T A COURT.

 

lol

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
15 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Courts do allow hearsay as evidence cant conevict on it it’s supporting evidence

You mean it would support other actual evidence.  Not create a narrative?  Devoid of evidence. 

 

Like her entire story about the him taking the wheel from the back seat of the beast.  Lmao 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

You mean it would support other actual evidence.  Not create a narrative?  Devoid of evidence. 

 

Like her entire story about the him taking the wheel from the back seat of the beast.  Lmao 

 

 

Are you talking about the situation? She described then his secret service wouldn’t take the stand to refute are you talking about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Are you talking about the situation? She described then his secret service wouldn’t take the stand to refute are you talking about that?

The entire discredited story that started with her telling the court what she heard from others. 

 

Just another of the very long line of false narratives that blew up on itself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

Cause it was hearsay.  It didn't exist.  It never happened. 

 

Just more crap to keep the mob raging

The secret service in question said that it didn’t happen they were invited into testify to set the record straight. They never did.
 

I don’t know whether it happened. I just know that she said it and they didn’t refute it. Underoath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

The secret service in question said that it didn’t happen they were invited into testify to set the record straight. They never did.
 

I don’t know whether it happened. I just know that she said it and they didn’t refute it. Underoath.

Cause it was hearsay. It was a story that didn't happen.

 

But you all bought the book. 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

You mean it would support other actual evidence.  Not create a narrative?  Devoid of evidence. 

 

Like her entire story about the him taking the wheel from the back seat of the beast.  Lmao 

 

 

Eh it's hearsay but there is a way around it, the testimony wouldn't be about what happened but what she heard someone saying happened. Which yes is obviously is hearsay about what happened but witnessing people's reaction to an event is still a legitimate thing, nowhere near as strong as actually witnessing it. What you're also clearly missing is that obviously this is basically worthless on it's own you'd need other evidence for it to be effective, like I don't know his fingerprints on the wheel, not an actual thing, just any kind of bits of evidence that also support it strengthen it and work together. 

 

Obviously all we really have is a hearsay story that's it could be true could not be she testified under oath that she heard it. The secret service who would have actually witnessed it refute the story, and that would strong evidence against it, if they actually testified under oath. Their refusal to do that while she did really makes this a wash to me.

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

So am I still eating pancakes or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...