Tiberius Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 And now look who is helping the Republicans right before the mid-terms. OPEC, led by the $2 billion givers to Jared, Saudis Just a coincidence, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: And now look who is helping the Republicans right before the mid-terms. OPEC, led by the $2 billion givers to Jared, Saudis Just a coincidence, right? At least it won't kill over a 6-1/2 million people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: And now look who is helping the Republicans right before the mid-terms. OPEC, led by the $2 billion givers to Jared, Saudis Just a coincidence, right? Huh? We have two parties. One has openly expressed disdain for petroleum products and the other has not. If you were OPEC, which party would you invest in? Once again…not complicated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Huh? We have two parties. One has openly expressed disdain for petroleum products and the other has not. If you were OPEC, which party would you invest in? Once again…not complicated! Not to mention that the Dems wanted to put the screws to MBS over JK's death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 JFC - what a mess. Now why would Conald want those Russian interference docs? I thought it was fake news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brueggs Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: JFC - what a mess. Now why would Conald want those Russian interference docs? I thought it was fake news? You're confusing Russian interference with a connection between the two. You definitely seem more interested in Trump being charged than the truth, whatever that may be. Was she/her/they/them this concerned over the Hillary documents? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Brueggs said: You're confusing Russian interference with a connection between the two. You definitely seem more interested in Trump being charged than the truth, whatever that may be. Was she/her/they/them this concerned over the Hillary documents? No no no no - the Trump campaign met how many times with the Russians? 140+ meetings Paul Manafort exchanged non public polling data with the Russians how many times? The Trump campaign didn’t coordinate Wikileaks drops with the Russians? Whys yes, yes they did. Keep trying Edited October 8, 2022 by BillStime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 3 hours ago, Brueggs said: You're confusing Russian interference with a connection between the two. You definitely seem more interested in Trump being charged than the truth, whatever that may be. Was she/her/they/them this concerned over the Hillary documents? More like they can't admit they were duped into believing any ridiculous excuse their masters gave them as to why Trump beat Hilly. And they have the temerity to call out anyone for denying the results of the 2020 election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Doc said: More like they can't admit they were duped into believing any ridiculous excuse their masters gave them as to why Trump beat Hilly. And they have the temerity to call out anyone for denying the results of the 2020 election. HA - you’re the freak that can’t admit you’ve been conned over and over and over again. Hell - your MASTERS had you believing that Durham would get to the bottom of it and failed bigly. On 2/13/2022 at 9:56 AM, Doc said: This is what will end up being worse than Watergate. Who can’t admit they were duped? The GOP Senate also concluded that Russia interfered to assist the Trump campaign but let’s not get tripped up on facts, right qDoc? https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf Idiots - 100% deranged and pathetic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 9, 2022 Share Posted October 9, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 9, 2022 Share Posted October 9, 2022 Now do Joke, Georgie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 1 hour ago, DRsGhost said: And if they don't indict Hunter, there will be a political price as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 13, 2022 Share Posted October 13, 2022 I wonder if they have discovered why he was keeping the docs and if he tried to use them for some purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 13, 2022 Share Posted October 13, 2022 34 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I wonder if they have discovered why he was keeping the docs and if he tried to use them for some purpose. Doubtful. Which is why this won't go anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T master Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 On 10/13/2022 at 12:40 PM, Tiberius said: I wonder if they have discovered why he was keeping the docs and if he tried to use them for some purpose. Well maybe if they would appoint someone other than the DOJ to look at the documents as they are suppose to & decide exactly what they are & tell every one involved instead of keeping it a big secret they might be able to find out the purpose . But they can't let someone other than them make that determination then we might know that it's a scam . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 21, 2022 Author Share Posted October 21, 2022 JFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 1 hour ago, BillStime said: JFC Nuclear secrets or just your every day variety secrets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Doc said: Who cares? How can you say that ? It's the greatest security risk in US history ! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 21, 2022 Author Share Posted October 21, 2022 3 hours ago, Doc said: Who cares? 3 hours ago, B-Man said: How can you say that ? It's the greatest security risk in US history ! . LOCK HER UP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 6, 2022 Author Share Posted November 6, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 6, 2022 Share Posted November 6, 2022 I hope they have those nuclear codes back under the control of our current POTUS dementia patient. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 6, 2022 Author Share Posted November 6, 2022 13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: I hope they have those nuclear codes back under the control of our current POTUS dementia patient. 👆🤡 Trump Gave Classified Info To Russians During White House Visit Sit this one out DR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 8, 2022 Author Share Posted November 8, 2022 Guy is nuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 9, 2022 Author Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Literally - ETTD When will the idiots just admit it and move on from MAGA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Literally - ETTD When will the idiots just admit it and move on from MAGA? I think they got a wake up call last night. But let’s not underestimate their stupidity 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Anyone still think Don's gonna get indicted over this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 7 minutes ago, Doc said: Anyone still think Don's gonna get indicted over this? Better than even odds. They have him dead to rights. Probably the most slam dunk case a prosecutor could ask for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Just now, ChiGoose said: Better than even odds. They have him dead to rights. Probably the most slam dunk case a prosecutor could ask for. We'll see. They'll probably come to an agreement...so he can run against DeSantis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 1 minute ago, Doc said: We'll see. They'll probably come to an agreement...so he can run against DeSantis. I’m not sure what incentive there would be for DoJ to accept a plea. Like I said, this is the easiest case they could ask for. His lawyers even admitted he committed the crime in the pleadings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Just now, ChiGoose said: I’m not sure what incentive there would be for DoJ to accept a plea. Like I said, this is the easiest case they could ask for. His lawyers even admitted he committed the crime in the pleadings. It goes above Merry's head. But again, we'll see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 1 minute ago, B-Man said: "the greatest security risk in US history" Soooo … that means Trump WASN’T selling nuclear secrets to our enemies, right? Never Trump, hardest hit. Interesting how we see this story from WaPo AFTER the midterm election. Granted, Trump was not on the ballot HOWEVER, plenty of candidates he endorsed were. Sort of like the convenient timing around the Hunter Biden laptop story. Before the election, it was RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION then after the election, OOPS, it was a real story and there is likely something there but moving on. Seeing this from WaPo a week after the midterms. Typical. From WaPo: That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said. No kidding. The people familiar with the matter cautioned that the investigation is ongoing, that no final determinations have been made, and that it is possible additional information could emerge that changes investigators’ understanding of Trump’s motivations. But they said the evidence collected over a period of months indicates the primary explanation for potentially criminal conduct was Trump’s ego and intransigence. Right. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2022/11/15/wapo-quietly-admits-fbi-found-nothin-in-raid-of-trumps-home-conveniently-after-the-election/ Well, that makes it completely ok. I mean if he said he just wanted to have them because he would miss them... And if he says he totally wasn't going to sell them. I don't know why, but I believe him! I mean, he's never lied before. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 15 minutes ago, B-Man said: "the greatest security risk in US history" Soooo … that means Trump WASN’T selling nuclear secrets to our enemies, right? Never Trump, hardest hit. Interesting how we see this story from WaPo AFTER the midterm election. Granted, Trump was not on the ballot HOWEVER, plenty of candidates he endorsed were. Sort of like the convenient timing around the Hunter Biden laptop story. Before the election, it was RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION then after the election, OOPS, it was a real story and there is likely something there but moving on. Seeing this from WaPo a week after the midterms. Typical. From WaPo: That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said. No kidding. The people familiar with the matter cautioned that the investigation is ongoing, that no final determinations have been made, and that it is possible additional information could emerge that changes investigators’ understanding of Trump’s motivations. But they said the evidence collected over a period of months indicates the primary explanation for potentially criminal conduct was Trump’s ego and intransigence. Right. https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2022/11/15/wapo-quietly-admits-fbi-found-nothin-in-raid-of-trumps-home-conveniently-after-the-election/ It doesn't matter for what purpose he took them, mere possession of them post-presidency is a crime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongyz Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 4 hours ago, ChiGoose said: It doesn't matter for what purpose he took them, mere possession of them post-presidency is a crime. Do Hillary next! It's all trash you know. Just 1 side using the government to lock up their opponents. Didn't see Donald lock Hillary up did you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Demongyz said: Do Hillary next! It's all trash you know. Just 1 side using the government to lock up their opponents. Didn't see Donald lock Hillary up did you? Sure thing! There are two key differences between Hillary and Trump when it comes to possession of government documents. 1. At the time, Hillary was a government employee with the appropriate security clearance to view the information. Trump was a private citizen with no security clearance. 2. The confidential information on Hillary’s server appeared to reach there unintentionally. The classification markings were generally way down on the email chains and it would be hard to overcome a defense of her not knowing they were there. Trump was told by NARA that he had no right to the documents and his lawyers signed documents saying he had returned all of the documents when he really hadn’t. Intent is very easy to infer there. The DoJ found that while Hillary lacked intent, she was recklessly careless. However, there have only been a handful of cases in history in which the DoJ secured a guilty verdict in a case like this on gross negligence. All of those cases are essentially things like throwing documents in a dumpster instead of shredding them or accidentally taking documents and leaving them in your buddy’s office desk drawer while you go out partying. As a government employee with appropriate clearance, Hillary had the right to access the information but how she did it was improper. As a private citizen with no government clearance (presidents don’t actually get security clearance), Trump had no possessory right to the documents. It would be near impossible for the DoJ to win a guilty verdict against Hillary given the facts. It should be a slam dunk to get one against Trump. Edited November 16, 2022 by ChiGoose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongyz Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 5 hours ago, ChiGoose said: Sure thing! There are two key differences between Hillary and Trump when it comes to possession of government documents. 1. At the time, Hillary was a government employee with the appropriate security clearance to view the information. Trump was a private citizen with no security clearance. 2. The confidential information on Hillary’s server appeared to reach there unintentionally. The classification markings were generally way down on the email chains and it would be hard to overcome a defense of her not knowing they were there. Trump was told by NARA that he had no right to the documents and his lawyers signed documents saying he had returned all of the documents when he really hadn’t. Intent is very easy to infer there. The DoJ found that while Hillary lacked intent, she was recklessly careless. However, there have only been a handful of cases in history in which the DoJ secured a guilty verdict in a case like this on gross negligence. All of those cases are essentially things like throwing documents in a dumpster instead of shredding them or accidentally taking documents and leaving them in your buddy’s office desk drawer while you go out partying. As a government employee with appropriate clearance, Hillary had the right to access the information but how she did it was improper. As a private citizen with no government clearance (presidents don’t actually get security clearance), Trump had no possessory right to the documents. It would be near impossible for the DoJ to win a guilty verdict against Hillary given the facts. It should be a slam dunk to get one against Trump. Eh... a Clinton is disgusting in every way. Trump is disgusting in every way. It's hard to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, Demongyz said: Eh... a Clinton is disgusting in every way. Trump is disgusting in every way. It's hard to say. They can both be disgusting (I didn’t vote for either) and still have different legal exposure. I personally think a private citizen stealing government documents is pretty bad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts