January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee

[BillStime]

36 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The key to our legal system is not that you testify under oath, but that you submit to a pointed cross examination. 

 

 

[BillStime]

🎯

 

 

[BillStime]

😳

 

@B-Man - what happened?

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

10 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

 

You'd be on much more solid ground speculating about "events of the day" causing someone's demise with the two protesters who had heart attacks on J6. They both had flash bang grenades detonated right next to them just before going into cardiac arrest.

 

But Julie Kelly is just "out to get the other side" with cOnSpIrAcY theories, right?

 

 

[Doc]

35 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

You'd be on much more solid ground speculating about "events of the day" causing someone's demise with the two protesters who had heart attacks on J6. They both had flash bang grenades detonated right next to them just before going into cardiac arrest.

 

But Julie Kelly is just "out to get the other side" with cOnSpIrAcY theories, right?

 

 

 

Boyland's situation sounds like George Floyd's.  And I didn't know the protestors who had heart attacks had flash bangs go off near them.  Explains a lot.  While Sicknick could in no way have had blood clots develop from events from the day before.

[BillsFanNC]

46 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Boyland's situation sounds like George Floyd's.  And I didn't know the protestors who had heart attacks had flash bangs go off near them.  Explains a lot.  While Sicknick could in no way have had blood clots develop from events from the day before.

 

Julie Kelly simply asked in a tweet that maybe the J6 committee should investigate the four deaths that actually happened on Capitol grounds on J6. That's it. And of course she received immediate pushback from legacy media, including the NYT, who she points out was responsible for the blatantly false Sicknick was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher fake news.

 

Eyewitness account of one of the heart attacks immediately after a flash bang below.

 

Simple questions for the Capitol police that the J6 committee might ask:

 

Is it standard protocol to launch flash bang grenades into a dense crowd of people without warning?

 

Did you attempt to stop the lone guy with the megaphone who for close to an hour is exhorting the crowd to move forward and then to fill up the Capitol? Seems as though that guy was working towards the opposite goal of the police and maybe stopping that behavior would be a good idea.

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

 

[BillStime]

3 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

 

 

Just another distraction for the cult - keep them RAGING DR - YOU GOT THIS BRO.

 

lmao

 

[B-Man]

 

WHAT ?

 

They lied for the cameras ?

 

Former Secretary of Defense lays to waste Cheney’s claim Trump did not offer to call up National Guard before Jan. 6

by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

 

Liz Cheney asserts former President Trump is lying about offering to call up 20,000 National Guardsmen two days before the Jan. 6 riot but comments by former Secretary of Defense Chris Miller and his Chief of Staff Kash Patel claim otherwise.

 

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/07/25/former-secdef-lays-to-waste-cheneys-claim-trump-did-not-offer-to-call-up-national-guard-before-jan-6-1265877/

 

 

 

 

.

[BillsFanNC]

If there was opportunity for proper cross examination from actual Republicans what do you suppose the chances are that we ever have public testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson?

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

WHAT ?

 

They lied for the cameras ?

 

Former Secretary of Defense lays to waste Cheney’s claim Trump did not offer to call up National Guard before Jan. 6

by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

 

Liz Cheney asserts former President Trump is lying about offering to call up 20,000 National Guardsmen two days before the Jan. 6 riot but comments by former Secretary of Defense Chris Miller and his Chief of Staff Kash Patel claim otherwise.

 

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/07/25/former-secdef-lays-to-waste-cheneys-claim-trump-did-not-offer-to-call-up-national-guard-before-jan-6-1265877/

 

 

 

 

.

It should be pointed out here—for all the accusations, allegations, and inferences Liz Cheney has made over the past year and a half, she’s offered nothing at all under oath. 
 

 

[BillsFanNC]

Gee, still lying. Shocker!

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillStime]

9 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Whatever helps you sleep better at night 

[BillsFanNC]

1 hour ago, DRsGhost said:

 

 

In other words as everyone already knows, it's the economy stupid...

 

Thus the push to redefine what a recession is. Which also won't matter because people see the ***** economy everyday when they go to the grocery store, restaurants and gas stations.

[Doc]

28 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

In other words as everyone already knows, it's the economy stupid...

 

Thus the push to redefine what a recession is. Which also won't matter because people see the ***** economy everyday when they go to the grocery store, restaurants and gas stations.

 

Yup.  It's as if they think everyone is as stupid as their true believers and that not calling it a recession will somehow make all the higher prices they/we are paying mean nothing, much less go away.

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

Always nice to see dems supporting "Republicans"

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

Period. Full stop. 

 

End. Of. Story.

 

 

[BillStime]

4 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

Period. Full stop. 

 

End. Of. Story.

 

 

 

The clowns cannot even keep their story straight...

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

DOJ/FBI always has the Ole FISA trick in their back pocket to spy on American citizens.

 

 

[BillStime]

Is this the law and order thread?

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

Judge rejects terrorism sentencing penalty in Jan. 6 case (msn.com)

 

Federal prosecutors' first request to draw tougher punishment for a Jan. 6 defendant by classifying his actions as domestic terrorism fell short Monday as a federal judge declined to apply the more severe sentencing guidelines permitted under federal law in such cases.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich said applying the sentencing enhancement to Guy Reffitt, 49, would create an "unwarranted sentencing disparity" with other cases involving similar threats or conduct related to the Capitol riot.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-rejects-terrorism-sentencing-penalty-in-jan-6-case/ar-AA10bEhO?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b21fff94d7a349238617f1d12d2224eb

 

 

 

.

[BillsFanNC]

Dems and their GOP partners will one day pay heavily for all of this crap.

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

If cross examination of J6 committee testimony was allowed, I'd sure like to see someone ask capitol police officers if this type of stuff is standard crowd control protocol?

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

I remember seeing this footage of the Qanon shaman awhile back, but it's extremely difficult to find now...I wonder why?  I finally found it buried inside this longer video.  The link starts with the Qanon shaman, aka Jacob Chansley, as he is escorted inside the Senate chamber....by a Capitol police officer.  At one point the officer asks Chansley and a few others milling around:

 

"Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?"

 

 

And then they pray.

 

It's horrific scene of violent bloodthirsty insurrectionists!!!

 

Let's show this video at the next prime time hearing shall we? 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2022 by DRsGhost

[Tiberius]

 

[nedboy7]

2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

I remember seeing this footage of the Qanon shaman awhile back, but it's extremely difficult to find now...I wonder why?  I finally found it buried inside this longer video.  The link starts with the Qanon shaman, aka Jacob Chansley, as he is escorted inside the Senate chamber....by a Capitol police officer.  At one point the officer asks Chansley and a few others milling around:

 

"Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?"

 

 

And then they pray.

 

It's horrific scene of violent bloodthirsty insurrectionists!!!

 

Let's show this video at the next prime time hearing shall we? 

 

 

 

LOL you are beyond stupid.  Almost GQP level. 

[BillsFanNC]

8 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

LOL you are beyond stupid.  Almost GQP level. 

 

As i've said to numerous other posters, that analysis coming from the likes of a moron such as yourself I wear proudly as a badge of honor.

 

Now go and hang on every lie this sham committee spoon feeds you....or just ***** off.

[nedboy7]

6 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

As i've said to numerous other posters, that analysis coming from the likes of a moron such as yourself I wear proudly as a badge of honor.

 

Now go and hang on every lie this sham committee spoon feeds you....or just ***** off.

 

You post that video to make that point?  

What's next?  TikTok videos that show voter fraud?  My god. 

The sham committee is made up of patriot republicans.  Something that is dead now thanks to your cult. 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2022 by nedboy7

[BillsFanNC]

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

You post that video to make that point?  

What's next?  TikTok videos that show voter fraud?  My god. 

The sham committee is made up of patriot republicans.  Something that is dead now thanks to your cult. 

 

 

 

First of all Democrats and Republicans both suck ass, although as of late the democrats are trying really hard to lay sole claim to that title.  

 

This isn't an attempt to prove that any of these individuals are innocent.

 

It is however proof of the sham committee and media once again leaving out key parts of what happened on J6 that don't fit their narrative.

 

I understand that you might have some difficulty with that level of nuance, but try to follow along.

 

The friggin Qanon shaman is the #1 poster boy for the violent Capitol "insurrection" narrative.  

 

Yet here in this video it shows...

 

Chansley calmly strolling into the senate chamber followed by a Capitol police officer who is doing absolutely nothing to stop him.

 

The same capitol police officer asks if they would please leave to which Chansley and another guy calmly respond that they will leave and they are making sure that nobody is disrespecting the place.  Then they say a group prayer.  No violence whatsoever.

 

They don't break anything, burn anything, try to injure anyone or do anything at all that can even be remotely called insurrectionist behavior.

 

Yet still Chansley is branded as a violent insurrectionist.  They are certainly trespassers who broke the law, but violent insurrectionists?  I'm sorry but if you still cling to that narrative then Orwell wants to have a word....

 

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

 

 

[nedboy7]

17 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

First of all Democrats and Republicans both suck ass, although as of late the democrats are trying really hard to lay sole claim to that title.  

 

This isn't an attempt to prove that any of these individuals are innocent.

 

It is however proof of the sham committee and media once again leaving out key parts of what happened on J6 that don't fit their narrative.

 

I understand that you might have some difficulty with that level of nuance, but try to follow along.

 

The friggin Qanon shaman is the #1 poster boy for the violent Capitol "insurrection" narrative.  

 

Yet here in this video it shows...

 

Chansley calmly strolling into the senate chamber followed by a Capitol police officer who is doing absolutely nothing to stop him.

 

The same capitol police officer asks if they would please leave to which Chansley and another guy calmly respond that they will leave and they are making sure that nobody is disrespecting the place.  Then they say a group prayer.  No violence whatsoever.

 

They don't break anything, burn anything, try to injure anyone or do anything at all that can even be remotely called insurrectionist behavior.

 

Yet still Chansley is branded as a violent insurrectionist.  They are certainly trespassers who broke the law, but violent insurrectionists?  I'm sorry but if you still cling to that narrative then Orwell wants to have a word....

 

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

 

 

 

Ok maybe we agree more than we think actually.  Yes I get your point.  I don't see the shaman idiot as the poster child of that day however.  If you look at how autocratic governments begin it is usually with rejecting elections and claiming any election they dont win is rigged.  Not with idiots whining about gender issues.  Yes both parties suck but I guess we both hate one more than the other. 

[Demongyz]

30 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Ok maybe we agree more than we think actually.  Yes I get your point.  I don't see the shaman idiot as the poster child of that day however.  If you look at how autocratic governments begin it is usually with rejecting elections and claiming any election they dont win is rigged.  Not with idiots whining about gender issues.  Yes both parties suck but I guess we both hate one more than the other. 

Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration?

Something like that right?

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

8 minutes ago, Demongyz said:

Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration?

Something like that right?

In fairness he may have just been Nedtoddler7 way back then. 

[Doc]

1 hour ago, Demongyz said:

Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration?

Something like that right?

 

This.  Not to mention what they did to Trump had an infinitely greater chance of overthrowing the government than what happened on J6.

[nedboy7]

1 hour ago, Demongyz said:

Kinda like the Dems did in 2016 and then used the full force of the government to attempt to paint Trump as a Russian asset for his entire administration?

Something like that right?

 

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.)

The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue.

 

But that is not my point.  Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. 

 

[wnyguy]

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.)

The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue.

 

But that is not my point.  Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. 

 

So if Putin and Russia helped Trump win in 2016 where were they in 2020? Those Commie bastards let us down.

[nedboy7]

4 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

So if Putin and Russia helped Trump win in 2016 where were they in 2020? Those Commie bastards let us down.

 

So why didn't Trump lock up Hillary.  Let's ask ######ed questions. 

[Demongyz]

22 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.)

The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue.

 

But that is not my point.  Anyone who starts to suggest any election they lose is rigged is aiming towards a dictatorship. 

 

Don't you find it odd that the party that controls the House, Senate and Presidency is so worried about dictatorship?  Isn't it odd that the party of lock people up, force people take shots is afraid of dictators?  You should look long and hard at what the Democratic party is doing.

14 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

So why didn't Trump lock up Hillary.  Let's ask ######ed questions. 

Because if you target the opposing party and attempt to put all of them in jail, the country becomes a dictatorship... What is going on now?