Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 50 minutes ago, BillStime said: white supremacists as the deadliest domestic terror threat facing the U.S. No that is a CNN/MSNBC talking point. Try again Billy Boy. 🙄 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 26 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: No that is a CNN/MSNBC talking point. Try again Billy Boy. 🙄 Unfortunate for your narrative - Trumps homeland security has a similar take: I am particularly concerned about white supremacist violent extremists who have been exceptionally lethal in their abhorrent, targeted attacks in recent years. Keep digging in your rabbit hole - this is fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 5 minutes ago, BillStime said: Unfortunate for your narrative - Trumps homeland security has a similar take: I am particularly concerned about white supremacist violent extremists who have been exceptionally lethal in their abhorrent, targeted attacks in recent years. Keep digging in your rabbit hole - this is fun. I’ll keep digging until you admit YOU’RE wrong. Where’s your proof that Trump sent in these goons? This is what started this whole exchange Billy Boy. Be a man. Admit you’re making ***** up hoping it’s true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: I’ll keep digging until you admit YOU’RE wrong. Where’s your proof that Trump sent in these goons? This is what started this whole exchange Billy Boy. Be a man. Admit you’re making ***** up hoping it’s true. Oh, I provided that link yesterday. Go fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh, I provided that link yesterday. Go fish. I missed the proof. Please go ahead and repost. You added a lot of links. I didn’t read them all I had to water my vacuum cleaner. Oh and while your at it I’m still not understanding what you meant by this. Pleased explain. what would the cult do without this talking point, Jim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 18 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: I missed the proof. Please go ahead and repost. You added a lot of links. I didn’t read them all I had to water my vacuum cleaner. Oh and while your at it I’m still not understanding what you meant by this. Pleased explain. what would the cult do without this talking point, Jim? I can't do the math for you... smarten up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 42 minutes ago, BillStime said: Unfortunate for your narrative - Trumps homeland security has a similar take: I am particularly concerned about white supremacist violent extremists who have been exceptionally lethal in their abhorrent, targeted attacks in recent years. Keep digging in your rabbit hole - this is fun. Police arrested Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on charges of “aiding and abetting mischief.” Shortly before her arrest Thursday, Lich mingled with protesters in the snow in front of Canada’s Parliament and urged people to “hold the line.” Lich is a well-known organizer among anti-lockdown and Islamophobic movements in Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 11 minutes ago, BillStime said: I can't do the math for you... smarten up. Sure you can. Clarify your point. It made no sense whatsoever. 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Police arrested Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on charges of “aiding and abetting mischief.” Shortly before her arrest Thursday, Lich mingled with protesters in the snow in front of Canada’s Parliament and urged people to “hold the line.” Lich is a well-known organizer among anti-lockdown and Islamophobic movements in Canada. And according to Billy Bou their orders apparently came directly from Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 40 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Sure you can. Clarify your point. It made no sense whatsoever. And according to Billy Bou their orders apparently came directly from Trump? Yes - Donald Trump is the accelerant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 16 hours ago, Niagara Bill said: What haven't they backed off federally. Travel restrictions and requirements at changing, truckers will not need to quarantine, but that matters little as they cannot enter into the US without full vaccination. The feds actually have little control of provincial rules, just like in the YS. These protests have far more depth that a mask. The challenge for you and some of your countrymen is that they’ve convinced you that kneeling is comfortable and assured you that after a while, you’ll hardly even notice you’re doing it. If the protestors were violating laws, there is presumably a process to arrest them. Why didn’t that occur? Wouldn’t that have solved the problem without passing control over the assets of everyday working folk to what really amounts to Corporate Canada? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 15 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: If the protestors were violating laws, there is presumably a process to arrest them. Why didn’t that occur? This may be why we saw a change in police leadership up north this week. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Hard lessons for law and order types, coming straight from the horse's mouth: You may believe in law and order in the historical, anglo sense that this nation has become accustomed to. I can assure you that those in power in major urban centers and in the federal government do not. You may believe in law and order, but you aren't the ones giving the orders, are you? The regime operates on a very strict friend-enemy dichotomy. They consider you their enemy. That makes them your enemy. If they control the police, then the police are also your enemy. Whoever the CLEO is in your county or municipality, you can figure that, conservatively, 90-95% of the officers in their ranks will obey their orders without question and without regard to things like the constitution. Police officers are taught in police academies that matters of the constitution are in judges' hands, and if a judge decides after the fact that an order was incorrect, well it's the judge's job to correct it. Obviously, police conduct constraints in accordance with the constitution are also taught in the academy but ultimately they will act indiscriminately, within those constraints, to carry out the orders of their CLEO. To make a long poast short: if leftists control the police, then ACAB, indeed. This should make you start to wonder how you can best influence who controls the law enforcement officers in your locality. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 7 minutes ago, LeviF said: This may be why we saw a change in police leadership up north this week. Could be. Of course, that likely signals a failure in leadership at the highest level of the organization. The appropriate response would be to provide clear messaging, clear communication of strategy, with a clear understanding of adverse consequences for dereliction of duty. Yet, Trudeau opted to up the ante and ratchet up the power to destroy people. The Canadiens ultimately chose to place their trust in government and large corporations, said corporations apparently shielded from liability for improperly seized or frozen accounts. From what I can see online, there are questions as to how the banks and financial institutions are expected to comply with Trudeau’s directive(s), not at all unusual when a governing body decides to go off half-cocked. This should end well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Could be. Of course, that likely signals a failure in leadership at the highest level of the organization. The appropriate response would be to provide clear messaging, clear communication of strategy, with a clear understanding of adverse consequences for dereliction of duty. Yet, Trudeau opted to up the ante and ratchet up the power to destroy people. As I've stated elsewhere inthread, the regime is acting as though they are standing on a jenga tower that is one block away from falling. Open defiance of federal pressure from the chief of police in the seat of federal government could be seen as such a block. They can't afford a "dereliction of duty." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niagara Bill Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 42 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: The challenge for you and some of your countrymen is that they’ve convinced you that kneeling is comfortable and assured you that after a while, you’ll hardly even notice you’re doing it. If the protestors were violating laws, there is presumably a process to arrest them. Why didn’t that occur? Wouldn’t that have solved the problem without passing control over the assets of everyday working folk to what really amounts to Corporate Canada? Yes, likely this act is not necessary and over kill, but this God mig died and local belief us that there is a angerous group who joined in. Why not arrested...I assume they wanted to allow protest, a right until it hot out if control. No one wanted injuries. Protesters have now brought children so when they get arrested there are picks of the kids crying and being removed. Trudeau is a politician, not a leader... But why did Jan 6th occur without police support, etc. Tough situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 27 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said: Yes, likely this act is not necessary and over kill, but this God mig died and local belief us that there is a angerous group who joined in. Why not arrested...I assume they wanted to allow protest, a right until it hot out if control. No one wanted injuries. Protesters have now brought children so when they get arrested there are picks of the kids crying and being removed. Trudeau is a politician, not a leader... But why did Jan 6th occur without police support, etc. Tough situation It’s not tough at all. You said it in your first sentence, though I would suggest formulating a scheme to seize assets in advance of due process is much, much more insidious than simple “overkill”. This is was a calculated plan designed to destroy and annihilate the opposition using the systems that people were conditioned to accept as safe throughout their lives. The good news in the US anyway, is that the entire populace has not been ground down to the point that they’ll accept a banker seizing lawfully earned money. Oy, Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 48 minutes ago, LeviF said: Hard lessons for law and order types, coming straight from the horse's mouth: You may believe in law and order in the historical, anglo sense that this nation has become accustomed to. I can assure you that those in power in major urban centers and in the federal government do not. You may believe in law and order, but you aren't the ones giving the orders, are you? The regime operates on a very strict friend-enemy dichotomy. They consider you their enemy. That makes them your enemy. If they control the police, then the police are also your enemy. Whoever the CLEO is in your county or municipality, you can figure that, conservatively, 90-95% of the officers in their ranks will obey their orders without question and without regard to things like the constitution. Police officers are taught in police academies that matters of the constitution are in judges' hands, and if a judge decides after the fact that an order was incorrect, well it's the judge's job to correct it. Obviously, police conduct constraints in accordance with the constitution are also taught in the academy but ultimately they will act indiscriminately, within those constraints, to carry out the orders of their CLEO. To make a long poast short: if leftists control the police, then ACAB, indeed. This should make you start to wonder how you can best influence who controls the law enforcement officers in your locality. I agree 100% that if given the order to arrest any dissenters they will do it without blinking an eye. That goes for our military as well. Just remember, the LEO and soldiers work for and protect the government and the elites. Not the tax paying, law abiding citizens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niagara Bill Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 38 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: It’s not tough at all. You said it in your first sentence, though I would suggest formulating a scheme to seize assets in advance of due process is much, much more insidious than simple “overkill”. This is was a calculated plan designed to destroy and annihilate the opposition using the systems that people were conditioned to accept as safe throughout their lives. The good news in the US anyway, is that the entire populace has not been ground down to the point that they’ll accept a banker seizing lawfully earned money. Oy, Canada. The US just distributed 10s of millions of Afghan and Taliban (some US citizens as well) money seized from banks and gave it to others. What gives any government the right to do this? Power, law, need. When you are facing terrorism of any type, use what you can to control. If they dispurse, none of thus is necessary. But you cannot allow illegal occupation of any city, holding its citizens hostage. What do local citizens pay their taxes for so a few can claim freedom, that is bs. What I continue to hear is that behind this protest is a radical group looking for a reason. Parliament was shutdown today, called at 4 30 am, highly unusual. The protestors in Alberta went home when they discovered a radical group amongst themselves. Everyone in a free country supports protest, not anarchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts