Doc Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: agreed Perfect example of making ***** up and riling-up the sheep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 5 minutes ago, Doc said: Perfect example of making ***** up and riling-up the sheep. What’s untruthful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 3 hours ago, BillStime said: What’s untruthful? You've been told numerous times that he mocks even non-disabled people the same way. And that's not even how the person he allegedly mocked acts. The guy can't move his arms at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Doc said: You've been told numerous times that he mocks even non-disabled people the same way. And that's not even how the person he allegedly mocked acts. The guy can't move his arms at all! Bullshittt - stop defending this - you sound like @Frat-Train; whoops - I mean @Deranged Rhino. Trump is trash. Speaking of Frat… Edited October 1, 2021 by BillStime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Bullshittt - stop defending this - you sound like @Frat-Train; whoops - I mean @Deranged Rhino. Trump is trash. See this is the kind of conflation that gets you guys every time and only makes everything worse. Sure, he mocked the reporter, but not his disability. Again the reporter in question can't even move his right arm (and I haven't seen video of him moving his left one either). If he meant to mock his disability, he'd have at least put his right arm at his side, flexed his elbow and hand, and kept them motionless while he mocked him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 2 minutes ago, Doc said: See this is the kind of conflation that gets you guys every time and only makes everything worse. Sure, he mocked the reporter, but not his disability. Again the reporter in question can't even move his right arm (and I haven't seen video of him moving his left one either). If he meant to mock his disability, he'd have at least put his right arm at his side, flexed his elbow and hand, and kept them motionless while he mocked him. More BS. That should have been the end of Trumps campaign. Period Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 (edited) 34 minutes ago, BillStime said: More BS. That should have been the end of Trumps campaign. Period The only BS is what you/the Dems are trying/tried to pass off, not just here but in multiple other instances. Would you like me to show you video of the reporter in question? Edited October 1, 2021 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 32 minutes ago, Doc said: The only BS is what you/the Dems are trying/tried to pass off, not just here but in multiple other instances. Would you like me to show you video of the reporter in question? Absolutely not - I am not human scum like you, your cult, and the SOB you can't get enough of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 15 hours ago, BillStime said: Absolutely not - I am not human scum like you, your cult, and the SOB you can't get enough of... Of course you don't. You just want to believe your false narratives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: Of course you don't. You just want to believe your false narratives. Nothing false about it. Trump, a 70+ year old POS mocking people and demeaning women (‘Horseface,’ ‘Lowlife,’ ‘Fat, Ugly’) is indefensible. Only human trash would defend and cheer this on… Get out of here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 48 minutes ago, BillStime said: Nothing false about it. Trump, a 70+ year old POS mocking people and demeaning women (‘Horseface,’ ‘Lowlife,’ ‘Fat, Ugly’) is indefensible. Only human trash would defend and cheer this on… Get out of here Yes because calling someone a Nazi or Hitler or a Russian operative or any of the other things they’ve called him is so nice and defensible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: Yes because calling someone a Nazi or Hitler or a Russian operative or any of the other things they’ve called him is so nice and defensible. Defenseless as usual - Trump has ALWAYS been a toxic pig. And Vlad loves your support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 3 hours ago, BillStime said: Defenseless as usual - Trump has ALWAYS been a toxic pig. And Vlad loves your support. More BS claims. Keep 'em coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Doc said: More BS claims. Keep 'em coming! Yeah Doc? Stormy too? BS? Slipping it in another woman after his third wife just had his fifth child? And you think Trump (or you) have credibility? Hussssssssssshhhh Just like @Deranged Rhino- you will die attempting to defend and deflect the truth for this scum bag. Edited October 2, 2021 by BillStime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Yeah Doc? Stormy too? BS? Slipping it in another woman after his third wife just had his fifth child? And you think Trump (or you) have credibility? Hussssssssssshhhh Just like @Deranged Rhino- you will die attempting to defend and deflect the truth for this scum bag. Is that materially any different than slipping your cigar into a 24-year old intern while in the Oval Office? Or trashing the women he raped and only staying with that guy because you want a political career? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 You guys should meet and have dinner at Applebees. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 10 minutes ago, Doc said: Is that materially any different than slipping your cigar into a 24-year old intern while in the Oval Office? Or trashing the women he raped and only staying with that guy because you want a political career? Close - Clinton got impeached - and Michael Cohen went to jail for Individual Number 1. Any updates on Trumps rape/DNA law suit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Close - Clinton got impeached - and Michael Cohen went to jail for Individual Number 1. Any updates on Trumps rape/DNA law suit? You are the biggest Trumptard on this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, Albwan said: You are the biggest Trumptard on this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 3 hours ago, BillStime said: Close - Clinton got impeached - and Michael Cohen went to jail for Individual Number 1. Any updates on Trumps rape/DNA law suit? No. Because there is no rape law suit. It's a defamation case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 11 hours ago, B-Man said: Another 'Insurrection'...😎 After Being Fired By Biden, Radicalized Horses Storm Capitol Shouting 'Trump Won!' “This has gone on long enough!” shouted the group’s leader, Mr. Ed Hoofer. “We aren’t going to sit around with long faces anymore. We’re going to trot right in there and let Nancy Pelosi know that we’re the glue that keeps this nation together! Down with Biden! Trump won! Trump won!” https://babylonbee.com/news/after-being-fired-by-democrats-radicalized-horses-storm-capitol-shouting-trump-won House and Senate leaders vowed to hold more hearings. Especially troubling the said was the involvement of "White" Horses in the uprising although plenty of Gray, Black, and Brown Horses were present. "Clearly there is some White Supremist threat in the Horse community and likely other livestock" said House leader Pelosi. Most puzzling to the Democratic Congressional group was how to address the threat from the Black and White spotted Cattle community. As they vowed to hold hearings in order to get down to just which side of the fence these Cows stood on here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 10 hours ago, Doc said: No. Because there is no rape law suit. It's a defamation case. Over a freakn RAPE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/finally-federal-judge-accuses-doj-of-treating-january-6-prisoners-unfairly-compared-to-blm-rioters/ FINALLY THE TRUTH — Federal Judge accuses DOJ of treating January 6 prisoners ‘unfairly’ compared to BLM rioters… WASHINGTON (AP) — Rejecting the recommendation of prosecutors, a federal judge sentenced a Jan. 6 prisoner to probation on Friday and suggested that the Justice Department was being too hard on those who broke into the Capitol compared to the people arrested during riots following George Floyd’s murder. U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden questioned why prosecutors had not brought more cases against those accused in 2020 summertime riots, reading out statistics on cases in the DC that were not prosecuted. “I think the U.S. attorney would have more credibility if it was even-handed in its concern about riots and mobs in this city,” McFadden said during Danielle Doyle’s sentencing for entering the Capitol on Jan. 6 with a throng of other protesters. Prosecutors recommended two months of home confinement for Doyle, who is from Oklahoma. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My goodness, probation? for such a violent and heinous crime!?! You don't say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 7 hours ago, BillStime said: Over a freakn RAPE. Alleged rape. Given she had to be told she was allegedly raped by friend and considers rape to be "sexy," she has no case where that's concerned. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Just now, Doc said: Alleged rape. Given she had to be told she was allegedly raped by friend and considers rape to be "sexy," she has no case where that's concerned. shut up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 55 minutes ago, BillStime said: shut up LOL! Sorry if another fantasy/lie you were told and willingly believed goes POOF! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 22 minutes ago, Doc said: LOL! Sorry if another fantasy/lie you were told and willingly believed goes POOF! Um - the former POTUS is fighting to give up his dna for a rape defamation case and you are acting like it’s a win - really freak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Back to the Jan. 6th thread............ “On the eve of the attack, the records show, the informant said that the group had no plans to engage in violence the next day except to defend itself from potential assaults from leftist activists…. Then, during an interview in April, the informant again told his handlers that Proud Boys leaders gave explicit orders to maintain a defensive posture on Jan. 6. At another point in the interview, he said that he never heard any discussion that day about stopping the Electoral College process…. According to the records, the informant first began to tell the F.B.I. what he knew about Jan. 6 in late December after a pro-Trump rally in Washington that month turned violent…. [T]he records contain no indication that the informant was aware of a possible plot by Proud Boys leaders to purposefully instigate those normal Trump supporters — or what members of the group refer to as ‘normies’— on Jan. 6.” Plus: “My hypothesis has been that if there had been a plan, the FBI would have known about it and it would have been defended against. If the government has evidence of a plan now, my question is why didn’t they know in advance and defend the Capitol properly? The simplest answer is that there was no plan.” https://althouse.blogspot.com/2021/09/but-statements-from-informant-appear-to.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Back to the Jan. 6th thread............ “On the eve of the attack, the records show, the informant said that the group had no plans to engage in violence the next day except to defend itself from potential assaults from leftist activists…. Then, during an interview in April, the informant again told his handlers that Proud Boys leaders gave explicit orders to maintain a defensive posture on Jan. 6. At another point in the interview, he said that he never heard any discussion that day about stopping the Electoral College process…. According to the records, the informant first began to tell the F.B.I. what he knew about Jan. 6 in late December after a pro-Trump rally in Washington that month turned violent…. [T]he records contain no indication that the informant was aware of a possible plot by Proud Boys leaders to purposefully instigate those normal Trump supporters — or what members of the group refer to as ‘normies’— on Jan. 6.” Plus: “My hypothesis has been that if there had been a plan, the FBI would have known about it and it would have been defended against. If the government has evidence of a plan now, my question is why didn’t they know in advance and defend the Capitol properly? The simplest answer is that there was no plan.” https://althouse.blogspot.com/2021/09/but-statements-from-informant-appear-to.html Desperate AF… why don’t you post the comments on the blog, too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 56 minutes ago, BillStime said: Um - the former POTUS is fighting to give up his dna for a rape defamation case and you are acting like it’s a win - really freak? He's fighting to stop wasting time on a frivolous lawsuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 10 hours ago, BillStime said: 2 hours ago, BillStime said: 38 minutes ago, BillStime said: Same as always wth billzy Over and over...............failing to break out of his bubble. Police Told to Hold Back on Capitol Riot Response, Report ... https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/us/politics/capitol-police-riot-report.html Capitol Police Told to Hold Back on Riot Response on Jan. 6, Report Finds ... The report was reviewed by The New York Times and will be the ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 Most are seeing the truth about January 6th now. As such, few care now that the Capitol's security will now be tighter than ever. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 3, 2021 Share Posted October 3, 2021 15 minutes ago, Doc said: Most are seeing the truth about January 6th now. As such, few care now that the Capitol's security will now be tighter than ever. delusional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 (edited) 31 minutes ago, BillStime said: delusional Now that we know of the FBI's involvement, footage from inside the Capitol after they got in and not just the outside/initial break-in footage, and that the police were told to stand-down by Nan, it's all over for you. You're not going to be able to runaway from the NYT's report. Edited October 4, 2021 by Doc 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 30 minutes ago, Doc said: Now that we know of the FBI's involvement, footage from inside the Capitol after they got in and not just the outside/initial break-in footage, and that the police were told to stand-down by Nan, it's all over for you. You're not going to be able to runaway from the NYT's report. LMAO - enjoy the ride GF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 11 hours ago, BillStime said: LMAO - enjoy the ride GF I will. It will be full of sound and fury; signifying nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 ROGER KIMBALL: The January 6 Insurrection Hoax. Notwithstanding all the hysterical rhetoric surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, two critical things stand out. The first is that what happened was much more hoax than insurrection. In fact, in my judgment, it wasn’t an insurrection at all. An “insurrection,” as the dictionary will tell you, is a violent uprising against a government or other established authority. Unlike the violent riots that swept the country in the summer of 2020—riots that caused some $2 billion in property damage and claimed more than 20 lives—the January 6 protest at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C. lasted a few hours, caused minimal damage, and the only person directly killed was an unarmed female Trump supporter who was shot by a Capitol Police officer. It was, as Tucker Carlson said shortly after the event, a political protest that “got out of hand.” At the rally preceding the events in question, Donald Trump had suggested that people march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically”—these were his exact words—in order to make their voices heard. He did not incite a riot; he stirred up a crowd. Was that, given the circumstances, imprudent? Probably. Was it an effort to overthrow the government? Hardly. I know this is not the narrative that we have all been instructed to parrot. Indeed, to listen to the establishment media and our political masters, the January 6 protest was a dire threat to the very fabric of our nation: the worst assault on “our democracy” since 9/11, since Pearl Harbor, and even—according to Joe Biden last April—since the Civil War! Note that phrase “our democracy”: Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and various talking heads have repeated it ad nauseam. But you do not need an advanced degree in hermeneutics to understand that what they mean by “our democracy” is their oligarchy. Similarly, when Pelosi talks about “the people’s house,” she doesn’t mean a house that welcomes riff-raff like you and me. I just alluded to Ashli Babbitt, the unarmed supporter of Donald Trump who was shot and killed on January 6. Her fate brings me to the second critical thing to understand about the January 6 insurrection hoax. Namely, that it was not a stand-alone event. On the contrary, what happened that afternoon, and what happened afterwards, is only intelligible when seen as a chapter in the long-running effort to discredit and, ultimately, to dispose of Donald Trump—as well as what Hillary Clinton might call the “deplorable” populist sentiment that brought Trump to power. In other words, to understand the January 6 insurrection hoax, you also have to understand that other long-running hoax, the Russia collusion hoax. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/january-6-insurrection-hoax/ Read the whole thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 18 minutes ago, B-Man said: ROGER KIMBALL: The January 6 Insurrection Hoax. Notwithstanding all the hysterical rhetoric surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, two critical things stand out. The first is that what happened was much more hoax than insurrection. In fact, in my judgment, it wasn’t an insurrection at all. An “insurrection,” as the dictionary will tell you, is a violent uprising against a government or other established authority. Unlike the violent riots that swept the country in the summer of 2020—riots that caused some $2 billion in property damage and claimed more than 20 lives—the January 6 protest at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C. lasted a few hours, caused minimal damage, and the only person directly killed was an unarmed female Trump supporter who was shot by a Capitol Police officer. It was, as Tucker Carlson said shortly after the event, a political protest that “got out of hand.” At the rally preceding the events in question, Donald Trump had suggested that people march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically”—these were his exact words—in order to make their voices heard. He did not incite a riot; he stirred up a crowd. Was that, given the circumstances, imprudent? Probably. Was it an effort to overthrow the government? Hardly. I know this is not the narrative that we have all been instructed to parrot. Indeed, to listen to the establishment media and our political masters, the January 6 protest was a dire threat to the very fabric of our nation: the worst assault on “our democracy” since 9/11, since Pearl Harbor, and even—according to Joe Biden last April—since the Civil War! Note that phrase “our democracy”: Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and various talking heads have repeated it ad nauseam. But you do not need an advanced degree in hermeneutics to understand that what they mean by “our democracy” is their oligarchy. Similarly, when Pelosi talks about “the people’s house,” she doesn’t mean a house that welcomes riff-raff like you and me. I just alluded to Ashli Babbitt, the unarmed supporter of Donald Trump who was shot and killed on January 6. Her fate brings me to the second critical thing to understand about the January 6 insurrection hoax. Namely, that it was not a stand-alone event. On the contrary, what happened that afternoon, and what happened afterwards, is only intelligible when seen as a chapter in the long-running effort to discredit and, ultimately, to dispose of Donald Trump—as well as what Hillary Clinton might call the “deplorable” populist sentiment that brought Trump to power. In other words, to understand the January 6 insurrection hoax, you also have to understand that other long-running hoax, the Russia collusion hoax. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/january-6-insurrection-hoax/ Read the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 4, 2021 Share Posted October 4, 2021 1 hour ago, BillStime said: Exactly. What insurrection? Keep trying.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts