BillStime Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 👆🤡👇 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 7 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Have you followed this case or is this what you heard on fox news? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 57 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Blame the victim Sounds about right 44 minutes ago, aristocrat said: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case. You’re defending someone that can’t even tell this woman from his ex-wife 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** get a job loser. one other than paid liar...l. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** You are a very ugly on the inside person. Do you live in a place where people can’t stand you or do you live in a place where you ***** your sister 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 11 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Does that matter in any way whatsoever? If a girl is a bit odd that gives a green light to rape her? You are f'd up. Get help. They dont care. We could find out 1k things he did alongside Epstein and they would just try and explain it away. Or, they'd go the Trump route and attack the accuser or judge. These people are f'n pathetic in every way. for sure,. this is who we are up against. no conscience, no ethics, no morals. and in our favor- small brains, bad genes and little knowledge. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: for sure,. this is who we are up against. no conscience, no ethics, no morals. and in our favor- small brains, bad genes and little knowledge. It’s….a…..cult 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 ⬆️ Dance for me fuk.c. stains!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: There's zero doubt that none of this BS ever happened. Corrupt to their core. I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News. It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge: - She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened - She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality - The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time - Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible - Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman - Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed - Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows") - Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows - She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves - She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies." - She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat ***** Sounds about as legit as Blasey-Ford was. But get a bunch of TDS'ers on a jury... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) Another thing we can glean from this thread is that these thugs also hate women. a profiler would have a field day here. Edited January 27 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 ⬆️ Quack, MD!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 It was a unanimous decision by a diverse qualified jury of peers….. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 19 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Racist retweeting a racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 57 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Blame the victim Sounds about right You’re defending someone that can’t even tell this woman from his ex-wife so he doesn’t recognize her that means he’s guilty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: so he doesn’t recognize her that means he’s guilty? This is just sad Could step in front of a camera and say that he did it so ***** what and you would come up with an excuse that’s how far down the rabbit hole you are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) Facts? For useful idiots? Thread title by useful idiot, as usual, has no relation to the facts.. I'm sure you want to be factually accurate, so it's important to note that the first jury specifically found Trump *not* liable for rape. It did, however, find him liable for sexual abuse. That finding is the foundation of the defamation campaign against Trump. If the first jury had been unable to find that Trump mistreated Carroll -- even by the low standard of proof required -- then the defamation campaign would have fallen apart. It depends on creating the legally-proven 'fact' that Trump abused Carroll. That is why I think Trump made a grievous error by not testifying in the first trial. Since this was a 25 year-old accusation that could not be proved one way or the other, his personal denial would have been important. Maybe a Manhattan jury would still have decided what it did, but Trump would at least have made his case. Edited January 27 by BillsFanNC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 So wait, was there any proof at all that they even met? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) 2 hours ago, aristocrat said: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-jean-carroll-makes-sexual-assault-claims-against-trump-and-moonves-new-york-magazine-2019-06-21/ that's a pretty emphatic denial of events. not just the she's not my type quote you mentioned. why was the interview of her with anderson cooper not allowed in the trial? seems pretty important to the case. Did she ever say the sentence rape is sexy? Why is the interview relevant? Is your point that if a female says something you can rape or sexually abuse her? Edited January 27 by L Ron Burgundy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 $83 Million? Quite a drop from what her lawyers were seeking: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 19 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Did she ever say the sentence rape is sexy? Why is the interview relevant? Is your point that if a female says something you can rape or sexually abuse her? no it causes people to question her credibility in the accusation. But you knew what I meant didn’t you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: no it causes people to question her credibility in the accusation. But you knew what I meant didn’t you? There is a huge difference between saying rape is sexy vs many people think rape is sexy. She's literally saying many people are f'd up. Then again no matter what someone says that doesn't mean they are eligible for rape. I've known many female comedians that make rape jokes. They don't want to be raped. You and your scum bag buddies will excuse anything he does. When he dies people that signed NDAs are gonna come out and tell their stories. And you psychos will defend him then too. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Just now, L Ron Burgundy said: There is a huge difference between saying rape is sexy vs many people think rape is sexy. She's literally saying many people are f'd up. Then again no matter what someone says that doesn't mean they are eligible for rape. I've known many female comedians that make rape jokes. They don't want to be raped. You and your scum bag buddies will excuse anything he does. When he dies people that signed NDAs are gonna come out and tell their stories. And you psychos will defend him then too. Can you point to exactly where i said I wanted her to be raped? Or she deserves it or anything close to that? I’ll wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: Can you point to exactly where i said I wanted her to be raped? Or she deserves it or anything close to that? I’ll wait You didn't outright. What direction is your little defense of him going when you think this is evidence absolving Trump? If she said rape is sexy, which we know is a portion of that sentence, so what? She's not even my type......then mistakes her for an ex wife. It'd be hilarious if you shmucks didn't worship this imbecile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 (edited) Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Edited January 27 by BillsFanNC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Ah yes, an unsuccessful rape attempt. Much better. Let's give you a standing ovation! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 ⬆️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 24 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: You didn't outright. What direction is your little defense of him going when you think this is evidence absolving Trump? If she said rape is sexy, which we know is a portion of that sentence, so what? She's not even my type......then mistakes her for an ex wife. It'd be hilarious if you shmucks didn't worship this imbecile. So to be clear I never mentioned it, implied in any way or anything. You made up a narrative in your mind and ran with it. Are you an insane person? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Go ahead and attack Dr. Carol Swain useful idiots. You racists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L Ron Burgundy Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 43 minutes ago, aristocrat said: So to be clear I never mentioned it, implied in any way or anything. You made up a narrative in your mind and ran with it. Are you an insane person? Finish your thought then. Specific to her rape comment. How would allowing that comment in the trial help the defense? Let me hear your narrative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 an accurate summary of the case sans silly propaganda memes and vile overtures https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4432789-e-jean-carroll-trump-legal-fight-key-moments/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Again LRon !@#$ stain like all the other useful idiots ignores that even a commie jury found the orange dude NOT liable for rape. Not. Liable. For. Rape. But that won't stop a useful idiot like Lron fuk.c stain.... Ok so just a little garden variety sexual abuse then, that’s just fine!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ Dance for me fuk.c. stains!!! it's interesting that this sad human's worst insult involves a moment of ecstasy enjoyed frequently by normal people but not by whoever this deviant is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts