Defund the Police?

[Doc]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

More like "do you want no cops..."

[BuffaloHokie13]

10 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Assuming the summary is correct, it's basically allowing the ones that do not result in any harm to be a misdemeanor. I'm okay with that tbh.

Edited August 27, 2020 by BuffaloHokie13

[Chef Jim]

11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

 

What the?!!?!?  Why not just put a bounty out on the cops.  

2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Assuming the summary is correct, it's basically allowing the ones that do not result in any harm to be a misdemeanor. I'm okay with that tbh.

 

Define harm.  

[BuffaloHokie13]

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

Define harm.  

"Must result in bodily injury" It's allowing police wives to slap their husbands when its deserved.

 

More seriously, it seems like if you were to throw a bottle at an officer it wouldn't be a felony unless you hit them pretty good with it. Should prevent some charges from being drummed up due to a bruised ego, but maybe I'm just optimistic. I'll be interested to hear our resident enforcers response to it. I get the feeling they won't care too much. 

[Chef Jim]

3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

"Must result in bodily injury" It's allowing police wives to slap their husbands when its deserved.

 

More seriously, it seems like if you were to throw a bottle at an officer it wouldn't be a felony unless you hit them pretty good with it. Should prevent some charges from being drummed up due to a bruised ego, but maybe I'm just optimistic. I'll be interested to hear our resident enforcers response to it. I get the feeling they won't care too much. 

 

Assault and Battery does not require bodily injury.

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

9 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Assuming the summary is correct, it's basically allowing the ones that do not result in any harm to be a misdemeanor. I'm okay with that tbh.

 

...yup...makes perfect sense......in lieu of ANY legal charges albeit misdemeanor or felony, we can just hand out "participation trophies" instead...SMH.....

[BuffaloHokie13]

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

Assault and Battery does not require bodily injury.

Read the summary

Quote

Eliminates the mandatory minimum term of confinement for an assault and battery committed against a judge; magistrate; law-enforcement officer; correctional officer; person directly involved in the care, treatment, or supervision of inmates; firefighter; or volunteer firefighter or any emergency medical services personnel and provides that such crime can no longer be committed as a simple assault and must result in a bodily injury.

Summary of Senate Bill 5032

 

[Chef Jim]

3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Read the summary

 

 

So they are redefining the legal term Battery? 

[BuffaloHokie13]

1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So they are redefining the legal term Battery? 

?‍♂️

I just read the summary and found the premise to be less inflammatory than the headline. How it is achieved is above my pay grade 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So they are redefining the legal term Battery? 

 

 

...yup...it's now the HARMLESS "Pink Bunny"........go figure......

[LB3]

30 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

I guess they want more justified use of force by officers. Democrats are evil.

[SoCal Deek]

I listened to the press conference from two knuckle heads leading up the Wisconsin AG's office yesterday. They started off stating the FACTS of the case as they know them...perfect.  Then, they went of the rails with a bunch of work non-sense about social unrest, systemic racism, and even brought the Milwaukee Bucks basketball team into it.  Really?

 

What's the one thing that ALL of these police shooting issues have in common that nobody wants to comment on?  If you are stopped by the police and are politely asked to do something ....do it!  Do not fight back. Do not try and get in your car. Get in the police car.  Do not reach for the officer's weapon, lethal or not. Do not run away. Do not drive away.

 

Are we clear? Sheeeeesh!

[Chef Jim]

21 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

?‍♂️

I just read the summary and found the premise to be less inflammatory than the headline. How it is achieved is above my pay grade 

 

I absolutely agree with this statement.  I have learned to really hate headlines.  And with my ADD I have been trapped by many myself over the years. 

[B-Man]

 

Defunding police would harm minority communities the most.

 

I feel like all the riots and assaults and arson and looting have really undermined the case for defunding the police. Heck, I’m starting to rethink my opposition to police militarization, a view that I held before cities were being assaulted with organized, hostile, often armed, mobs.

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

Sheriffs in neighboring counties turn down Gov. Kate Brown’s request to send deputies to Portland to assist

 

This what it will be like Kate.

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: Democrats Keep Letting BLM Rage Mob Ruin Police Careers. 

 

“The anti-police sentiment in cities run by Democrats is getting worse by the day. Those of us who write about this stuff all the time have been speculating for months about how many law enforcement officers would be leaving the profession altogether because of this crap. As we saw in Seattle, cops are getting abandoned and thrown under the bus by progressive loon politicians who would rather side with rioters than law enforcement.”

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[1B4IDye]

 

 

 

 

 

[1B4IDye]

 

 

 

[1B4IDye]

 

 

 

Edited September 13, 2020 by Hedge