Gretchen Whitmer

[B-Man]

 

 

CHINA IMPRESSED BY MICHIGAN GOVERNOR’S TOTALITARIAN POLICIES: 

 

Michigan Bars, Restaurants Will Require Customer’s Names And Phone Numbers Starting Monday.

 

 

UPDATE: “Remember when that tech millionaire did a Biden ad about how Trump is killing his nightclub?”, Jim Treacher asks.

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 Court Rules Michigan Recall Effort Against Governor Can Proceed – Gretchen Whitmer Responds With Implied Violence:

“We will beat them on the streets”.

 

 

 

Be glad it’s just a recall, madam, and not what you deserve. 

I’d advise you give thanks fasting that despite everything your ilk has done to us, Americans remain by and large law abiding.

 

 

 

[Unforgiven]

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 Court Rules Michigan Recall Effort Against Governor Can Proceed – Gretchen Whitmer Responds With Implied Violence:

“We will beat them on the streets”.

 

 

 

Be glad it’s just a recall, madam, and not what you deserve. 

I’d advise you give thanks fasting that despite everything your ilk has done to us, Americans remain by and large law abiding.

 

 

 

3..2..1...lefty incoming with trump gibberish

[Backintheday544]

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 Court Rules Michigan Recall Effort Against Governor Can Proceed – Gretchen Whitmer Responds With Implied Violence:

“We will beat them on the streets”.

 

 

 

Be glad it’s just a recall, madam, and not what you deserve. 

I’d advise you give thanks fasting that despite everything your ilk has done to us, Americans remain by and large law abiding.

 

 

 

Can I ask you, do you read the things you just copy and paste or do you just say hey this is from some right wing thing I like and fits the topic?

 

In your Matt Gaetz thread when he wanted to shoot up social media people you said, we wait you didn’t say because you rarely have an opinion but you copy and pasted:

 

Kinzinger was hardly alone in asserting that Gaetz’s horrendous remarks aren’t protected by the First Amendment, though they almost certainly are. The Supreme Court has ruled that advocating violence is constitutionally protected speech, unless said speech is likely to cause “imminent lawless action.” That would be a very difficult standard to meet in this case.

 

So please with your own words for once describe how they’re different?

[B-Man]

4 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:

Can I ask you, do you read the things you just copy and paste or do you just say hey this is from some right wing thing I like and fits the topic?

 

In your Matt Gaetz thread when he wanted to shoot up social media people you said, we wait you didn’t say because you rarely have an opinion but you copy and pasted:

 

Kinzinger was hardly alone in asserting that Gaetz’s horrendous remarks aren’t protected by the First Amendment, though they almost certainly are. The Supreme Court has ruled that advocating violence is constitutionally protected speech, unless said speech is likely to cause “imminent lawless action.” That would be a very difficult standard to meet in this case.

 

So please with your own words for once describe how they’re different?

 

 

There is no particular reason for you to remember my past posts here on PPP, but at least once a month I get the same question and I answer it the same way.

Yes I read the articles I post.

I post mostly from conservative sites, because I know posters, such as yourself probably have not seen them.

I did post on Kitzinger, your reply is almost word for word from my post.

 

The only response that I have for you is that i post for information and different opinions than the usual suspects here do.

 

But it does NOT mean that I agree with every word I post, that is the common mistake here.

 

I am not posting to WIN arguments,  I will leave that to the kids.

 

 

Gretchen made a stupid politician remark, like every other politician out there. She deserves to be ridiculed.

 

 

 

 

[Backintheday544]

23 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

There is no particular reason for you to remember my past posts here on PPP, but at least once a month I get the same question and I answer it the same way.

Yes I read the articles I post.

I post mostly from conservative sites, because I know posters, such as yourself probably have not seen them.

I did post on Kitzinger, your reply is almost word for word from my post.

 

The only response that I have for you is that i post for information and different opinions than the usual suspects here do.

 

But it does NOT mean that I agree with every word I post, that is the common mistake here.

 

I am not posting to WIN arguments,  I will leave that to the kids.

 

 

Gretchen made a stupid politician remark, like every other politician out there. She deserves to be ridiculed.

 

 

 

 

So you’re just spamming the board. Per the board rules spamming isn’t allowed.

[B-Man]

11 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:

So you’re just spamming the board. Per the board rules spamming isn’t allowed.

 

 

THAT'S what you got from my post ?

 

Wow.

 

Here is what "spamming" is.

 

 

Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, for the purpose of non-commercial proselytizing, for any prohibited purpose (

OR)

On the Internet, the term spam means unwanted messages posted to newsgroups or sent to a list of users through e-mail.

 

 

My posting of conservative news articles on a Political message board is about as far away from spamming as you can get.

 

I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "snowflake" here, but you come pretty close.

 

 

 

[Backintheday544]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

THAT'S what you got from my post ?

 

Wow.

 

Here is what "spamming" is.

 

 

Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, for the purpose of non-commercial proselytizing, for any prohibited purpose (

OR)

On the Internet, the term spam means unwanted messages posted to newsgroups or sent to a list of users through e-mail.

 

 

My posting of conservative news articles on a Political message board is about as far away from spamming as you can get.

 

I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "snowflake" here, but you come pretty close.

 

 

 

As I pointed out, in the Whitney thread you said one thing, in the other thread you said the complete opposite.

 

Sorry, my bad, you didn’t say, you posted links to conservative webpages that provided countering views. As you said, you rarely have an opinion when positing here. All you do is Post right wing articles. You don’t give a thought if they are counter to other things you post, you just

post them.

 

let’s break it down to the prima facile case:

use of a messaging system - check

sending multiple unsolicited messages - check, you post random sites all the time

for the purpose of commercial

advertising - maybe? You post ransom sites to drive people to

go tho that have countering opinions to each other

for the purposes of proselytizing - well yea you do. You just post right bs mainly for proselytizing. You even said  you don’t care about what’s being said you just want to spread the word of the right while trying to drive traffic to such sites.

 

You already said you’re an NPC on this board as you don’t do anything but spam the board with right wing click bait.

 

 

[Backintheday544]

17 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

THAT'S what you got from my post ?

 

Wow.

 

Here is what "spamming" is.

 

 

Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, for the purpose of non-commercial proselytizing, for any prohibited purpose (

OR)

On the Internet, the term spam means unwanted messages posted to newsgroups or sent to a list of users through e-mail.

 

 

My posting of conservative news articles on a Political message board is about as far away from spamming as you can get.

 

I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "snowflake" here, but you come pretty close.

 

 

 

wanted to add: I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "bot” here, but you come pretty close.

[B-Man]

1 minute ago, Backintheday544 said:

 

 

You already said you’re an NPC on this board as you don’t do anything but spam the board with right wing click bait.

 

 

 

Quick reminder of what I DID say.

 

There is no particular reason for you to remember my past posts here on PPP, but at least once a month I get the same question and I answer it the same way.

 

Yes I read the articles I post.

 

I post mostly from conservative sites, because I know posters, such as yourself probably have not seen them.

 

I did post on Kitzinger, your reply is almost word for word from my post. (Funny that)

 

The only response that I have for you is that i post for information and different opinions than the usual suspects here do.

 

But it does NOT mean that I agree with every word I post, that is the common mistake here. ( I do agree with much of it)

 

I am not posting to WIN arguments,  I will leave that to the kids.

 

 

Gretchen made a stupid politician remark, like every other politician out there. She deserves to be ridiculed.

 

 

 

None of this equals spamming..........despite BITD544's absurd arguments.

 

 

I have been posting for over 10 years 

 

45,195 posts to be exact............none of which is spam.

 

Maybe it's time for you to head on upstairs to bed now, you are obviously over-tired and not thinking clearly.

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Sorry for that crap above.......................I should have just ignored his nonsense.

 

 

 

 

Way too early but good to hear.

 

 

Potential GOP Challenger Would Defeat Whitmer in Michigan Governor's Race

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/06/09/potential-gop-challenger-would-defeat-whitmer-in-michigan-governors-race-n1453147

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Sorry for that crap above.......................I should have just ignored his nonsense.

 

 

 

 

Way too early but good to hear.

 

 

Potential GOP Challenger Would Defeat Whitmer in Michigan Governor's Race

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/06/09/potential-gop-challenger-would-defeat-whitmer-in-michigan-governors-race-n1453147

All good B.  Some people have a fixation on what other posters choose to share, and in some cases, an unhealthy fixation with posters no longer here. 
 

Keep on truckin. 

[SoCal Deek]

On 6/1/2021 at 8:24 PM, Backintheday544 said:

wanted to add: I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "bot” here, but you come pretty close.

Now do Billstime.

[LeviF]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.detroitnews.com/amp/8013618002
 

This is getting weird. 
 

Quote

The arrest of an FBI agent credited with helping thwart a plot to kidnap and kill Gov. Gretchen Whitmer complicates one of the most closely watched cases of violent extremism that is becoming increasingly focused on allegations of wrongdoing by investigators.

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

7 hours ago, LeviF said:

The arrest of an FBI agent credited with helping thwart a plot to kidnap and kill Gov. Gretchen Whitmer complicates one of the most closely watched cases of violent extremism that is becoming increasingly focused on allegations of wrongdoing by investigators.

 

 

It needs to be clear how the FBI operates when they "break up plots of violent extremism".  Simply, through their involvement they manufacture the plots they break up.  The absence of the FBI in these situations would result in no plot and nothing to break up.  No big headlines about the effectiveness and professionalism of the FBI and no big extremist threats for the government to use to support their agenda.  Its like the window replacement guy that goes around town at 2 AM throwing bricks through storefront windows.  And the next day he comes in to fix it all.   

 

In this case the FBI informants and operatives planted the idea of kidnapping the Governor within the group, helped develop that plan, and then arrested them all for the plot the FBI created.  More BS but at this point BS is all our dysfunctional government produces. 

 

 

[LeviF]

25 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It needs to be clear how the FBI operates when they "break up plots of violent extremism".  Simply, through their involvement they manufacture the plots they break up.  The absence of the FBI in these situations would result in no plot and nothing to break up.  No big headlines about the effectiveness and professionalism of the FBI and no big extremist threats for the government to use to support their agenda.  Its like the window replacement guy that goes around town at 2 AM throwing bricks through storefront windows.  And the next day he comes in to fix it all.   

 

In this case the FBI informants and operatives planted the idea of kidnapping the Governor within the group, helped develop that plan, and then arrested them all for the plot the FBI created.  More BS but at this point BS is all our dysfunctional government produces. 

 

 

Entrapment? Federal agents? Never!

 

[Niagara Bill]

43 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It needs to be clear how the FBI operates when they "break up plots of violent extremism".  Simply, through their involvement they manufacture the plots they break up.  The absence of the FBI in these situations would result in no plot and nothing to break up.  No big headlines about the effectiveness and professionalism of the FBI and no big extremist threats for the government to use to support their agenda.  Its like the window replacement guy that goes around town at 2 AM throwing bricks through storefront windows.  And the next day he comes in to fix it all.   

 

In this case the FBI informants and operatives planted the idea of kidnapping the Governor within the group, helped develop that plan, and then arrested them all for the plot the FBI created.  More BS but at this point BS is all our dysfunctional government produces. 

 

 

Sounds like the 60s. 

[LeviF]

26 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Sounds like the 60s. 

Unironically yes

[B-Man]

 

[B-Man]