Jump to content

Dear #DeepState Coup Catchers Durham and Barr


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:


If Obama broke the law - indict him.

That wasn't the question.  To quote myself from just before I wasted my time yet again:  

Imo, your approach is that you pose a question or questions, expect answers but rarely answer directly yourself.  It’s classic deflection, and that’s fine, but it makes it hard to take you seriously. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

I do not care what left wing media reports or does not report.  

Then why all the links from left wing outlets that purport wrongdoing and criminality on the part of DJT?   You consistently refer to non-believers as cultists and provide links that align with your dogma. Your actions suggest you care deeply what the media suggests is the truth, up to and including using them in an attempt to buttress your arguments.   

 

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Just like you don’t care what right wing media reports or does not report.

 

Sure I care.  I'm trying to get as fair a picture of the world as I can from sources that are generally not worthy of unconditional trust.  I have a belief system based on my experiences and my point of view.  However, in the case of, say, Trump/Russia and Mueller, the reality is that nothing came of it.  That's not me buying into right wing media, that's a 100% certifiable fact. 

 

Fox News, for example, never broke the HRC aligned with Russia story, or that Obama and Biden were briefed on her campaign's involvement.   That's troubling to me, as troubling as the WaPost quoting anonymous source after anonymous source and getting the entire story wrong.  

 

Anyway, I had hopes you would answer directly on the simple, innocuous questions I posed, but it exceeds your capacity.  

1 hour ago, DRsGhost said:

 

I think it would be incumbent upon a President not to be neck deep in such an affair from the beginning, but that ship had sailed for Obama. As Obama was going out the door he was too busy having Susan Rice drafting memos stating that everything related to Russia gate was done "by the book."

 

https://nypost.com/2020/05/20/susan-rices-now-infamous-memo-was-blatant-bid-to-cover-obamas-butt/

 

Hillary wasn't supposed to lose, that's really what everything here is about. Post election 2016 had the outgoing Obama administration scrambling in a massive clean up operation. There was no way he was ever going to come clean about the Clinton connection because that would eventually lead to the Obama connection.

 

 

 

I don't think they knew, or more importantly I don't think they wanted to know if there was a Clinton connection as the story was breaking. Heck, they still can't be bothered to report on the DNC/Clinton connection to this day. I think those media outlets have sources in the IC that leak to "journalists" who without even a thought towards independently verifying anything, dutifully parrot what their sources tell them to. And then it takes months to years for real journalists doing real journalism to uncover what actually went on.

 

 

Thanks for taking the time to answer directly.  Perhaps, one day, others shall benefit from your leadership and follow suit!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

Yes. It is all laid out in the Mueller report.

 

Now here's the part that you don't care about -- but you should because it is important and gives the "so what" to your question.  Mueller had 140+ chances to find 2016 election meddling by the Trump campaign, and said there's no evidence of it.  It was his sole and specific job to look for it.  He reported that he found nothing.  On top of that, Pelosi had the ability to impeach Trump -- and she did so twice.  Neither impeachment had to do with collusion or 2016 election interference.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

Thanks for taking the time to answer directly.  Perhaps, one day, others shall benefit from your leadership and follow suit!  

 

I commend you for having what seems like limitless patience with these guys and also for retaining any hope that they will engage in a manner that even remotely resembles intellectual honesty at any point in the future.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

Durham probe has already snared the scalp of FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith

Oh no, not THE Kevin Clinesmith. OMG, that's like .... 25 steps from Hillary herself! Kind of the Papadopoulos of the Dems.

Posting hint: if you're gonna invoke the screen name of the wildest conspiratorial poster of all time, you gotta do better. Channel your DR! He would've said that the real Hillary was arrested by the military a long time ago. Too bad the mods scrubbed the "Q Analysis" 600 page thread. You'll have to ask DR if he archived it ... somewhere in a hidden bunker in North Hollywood.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/06/17/fact-check-hillary-clinton-not-hanged-guantanamo-bay/7687922002/

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

I commend you for having what seems like limitless patience with these guys and also for retaining any hope that they will engage in a manner that even remotely resembles intellectual honesty at any point in the future.


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Quote

 

Fusion GPS is no longer an opposition research firm, and they weren’t hired to dig-up dirt against Trump. Instead, they would have you believe, after the phony dossier and the Alfa Bank hoax, that Fusion GPS was retained to provide legal advice to the Hillary Clinton Campaign. Remarkable.


 

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Oh no, not THE Kevin Clinesmith. OMG, that's like .... 25 steps from Hillary herself! Kind of the Papadopoulos of the Dems.

Posting hint: if you're gonna invoke the screen name of the wildest conspiratorial poster of all time, you gotta do better. Channel your DR! He would've said that the real Hillary was arrested by the military a long time ago. Too bad the mods scrubbed the "Q Analysis" 600 page thread. You'll have to ask DR if he archived it ... somewhere in a hidden bunker in North Hollywood.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/06/17/fact-check-hillary-clinton-not-hanged-guantanamo-bay/7687922002/

 

Gee, still more deflecting. I'm shocked.

 

Can you answer any of the points made in direct response to your posts or answer the direct questions asked of you over the past 24 hours? Or are you going to continue with the @BillStime routine?

 

Until then I'll just take this response to mean that you're perfectly OK with an FBI lawyer altering documents to be presented to a FISA court. 

 

And like with others my alt name is clearly doing its work. The real DR is living quite comfortably in your head. Still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Gee, still more deflecting. I'm shocked.

 

Can you answer any of the points made in direct response to your posts or answer the direct questions asked of you over the past 24 hours? Or are you going to continue with the @BillStime routine?

 

Until then I'll just take this response to mean that you're perfectly OK with an FBI lawyer altering documents to be presented to a FISA court. 

 

And like with others my alt name is clearly doing its work. The real DR is living quite comfortably in your head. Still.


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

PS: Every accusation is a confession

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Love this feature!

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

 

And it's been at least a week so it's time once again...

 

 

Hey @BillStime ***** off!


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

18 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

I only see your drivel when others quote it, so thankfully it's very little.

 

37 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Love this feature!

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

 

And it's been at least a week so it's time once again...

 

 

Hey @BillStime ***** off!

 

This guy is a liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BillStime said:


How do you KNOW wtf info was received at Donny Jr’s meeting? And how do we know this was the FIRST meeting of several?

 

And why are you afraid to answer the questions above?

 

Does it completely blow your arguments out the window?


giphy.gif?cid=5e214886s9t8rjyll4y6moudqk

6d7akv.jpg

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

I wonder why?

 

 

In an earlier post, ole BillSy wondered aloud at what a “conservative attorney” had to “hide” when he asserted attorney/client  privilege.   He’s got to be doubly concerned with two parties trying that old flimflam!  Stay tuned for outrage!  

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

It's OK if the coup/insurrection lasted years instead of 1 afternoon.

 

We can't worry about that when we can not know what Trump said to Russians and assume the worst. 

 

Because after all the best way to "save our democracy" is to investigate people to look for crimes instead of the other way around.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

MATT MARGOLIS: Here’s the Tweet Clinton’s Lawyer Doesn’t Want Admitted as Evidence in Durham Case.

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/04/20/heres-the-tweet-clintons-lawyer-doesnt-want-admitted-as-evidence-in-durham-case-n1591425

 

 

 

 

Yet anything and everything should be used when it comes to J6. :rolleye:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Another guy who has the actual DR living in his head.

 

Love it!


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Guess who is a COWARD?

 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

 

lol ...the new new tart talking point "coward" hahahaha...

cult was better, just saying, dbag.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Durham’s Investigation Is Finally Getting Interesting: Reading the Clinton tea leaves in the Sussmann prosecution.

 

Durham and his staff are preparing to try heavyweight Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann in about three weeks. Plainly, their focus is broader than just the one alleged false statement to the FBI on which Sussmann has been indicted. Durham’s charging documents and court submissions strongly intimate that the Hillary campaign is the fons et origo of the Trump/Russia “collusion” farce that dizzied the country and hamstrung a presidency for two years.

 

The theory is straightforward: The Clinton campaign, working through its lawyers at Perkins Coie and its “oppo” gourmands at Fusion GPS, ginned up a smear that the Republican presidential nominee and his campaign were Vladimir Putin’s own little KGB cell attempting to take control of the United States government.

 

The Clinton campaign not only peddled this narrative to the media-Democrat complex, which dutifully hyped it; Team Clinton also had operatives, such as Sussmann (a former Justice Department cybersecurity specialist and man-about-Washington), exploit their deep government ties to project the collusion story onto the radar of national-security agencies. This enabled the campaign to claim that concerns about Trump’s nefarious Russia relationship had blossomed into a criminal investigation.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/04/durhams-investigation-is-finally-getting-interesting/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been 15 months since Trump left office and still no charges for treason.  You'd think that with all the times they met and all this evidence, and the fact that treason is one of the worst transgressions there is, they'd be pursuing it fervently now that he's out of office.  I wonder why they're not...

 

Oh wait, no I don't.  It's because it's been proven to be the bull#### it looked like from the beginning.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

It's been 15 months since Trump left office and still no charges for treason.  You'd think that with all the times they met and all this evidence, and the fact that treason is one of the worst transgressions there is, they'd be pursuing it fervently now that he's out of office.  I wonder why they're not...

 

Oh wait, no I don't.  It's because it's been proven to be the bull#### it looked like from the beginning.

 

Trump is orange.

 

Trump is a narcissistic blowhard.

 

Trump tweets mean things and calls out people in a non Presidential way.

 

Trump has made light of handicapped people in campaign events.

 

Etc. Etc.

 

All of the above things, at least IMO, are true statements about Donald Trump. And to add it all up it means that Donald Trump is basically an #######.

 

To some people that means all of the spying and made up BS is justified. Get Trump by any means necessary. 

 

To honest people, being an ####### doesn't justify any of it. Because we actually have principles.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Trump is orange.

 

Trump is a narcissistic blowhard.

 

Trump tweets mean things and calls out people in a non Presidential way.

 

Trump has made light of handicapped people in campaign events.

 

Etc. Etc.

 

All of the above things, at least IMO, are true statements about Donald Trump. And to add it all up it means that Donald Trump is basically an #######.

 

To some people that means all of the spying and made up BS is justified. Get Trump by any means necessary. 

 

To honest people, being an ####### doesn't justify any of it. Because we actually have principles.

 


 

So the Trump campaign didn’t meet with the Russians 140+ times? Coordinate campaign data and Wikileaks drops?

 

Simple yes or no will suffice.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...