Jump to content

GDT: Iowa Caucus


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, B-Man said:

AT LONG LAST LIVE: Let’s Try This Again: LIVE 2020 Iowa Caucus Results.

 

 

 

Democrats say they have figures for 62% of the precincts. 62% of precincts could be a small percentage of the actual votes casts. Some precincts have 8 voters, some 800.

 

 

 

It at least looks like they’re gaming the narrative.

 
 
 
.

 

 

,....any news yet from the Ukraine precinct?...........

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, section122 said:

On a side not how terrible are caucuses?  I was talking with my wife last night about this.  You don't get to vote in private and it takes hours to complete.  We have 2 small children and therefore would have to decide which 1 of the 2 of us got to vote.  My house with 2 registered voters would only get 1 vote.  I have to imagine this effects many people.  Between childcare, working, and/or other responsibilities, how are people supposed to participate in this democratic process?  Unless that is the point...

 

We had them in my state until they decided to go with a primary this time.

 

It was kindof fun I guess if you're a political junkie.  About 1 hour in I started to think, what about the people with small children that can't afford a baby sitter?  Or the people who's kids had a soccer game that morning?   Or the people that can't sit/stand for 2 hours?  Or the people that have to work on Saturday ...

 

Meanwhile, my wife and I who have no kids left at home and don't work Saturday were able to be there. 

 

Doesn't seem fair or inclusive. At least in my state, I think that was the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So did Trump abuse his office to hurt a guy who couldn’t get in the top three in Iowa? Trump is so dumb 

Just now, Jaraxxus said:

So very corrupt. Buttman writes the app that screws Bernie? Is there any more democratic party thing than that?

How’d it screw Bernie? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So did Trump abuse his office to hurt a guy who couldn’t get in the top three in Iowa? Trump is so dumb ...

 

except that the whole argument was based upon a political candidate who had the ability to defeat Trump. but, you know..... go ahead and move the goal posts because... #orangemanbad.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So did Trump abuse his office to hurt a guy who couldn’t get in the top three in Iowa? Trump is so dumb 

 

I've been saying this all along.  If Donald really did do that whole call etc to dig up dirt on Biden he is even dumber than I thought.  You don't need to dig up dirt on Biden.  He arrives at campaign stops with 2 dump trucks full of dirt.  AND, he provides new dirt on a monthly basis if not more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

He beat Klobuchar though. Credit where credit is due

 

 

 

Old and busted: Count every vote!

 

New hotness: Cancel any election we lose!

 

.

 


“who just had Iowa to himself” ... like Hillary, the more you see of Joey B.,the less you like him. He is dumb, creepy, and not very charming (in spite of what he may think). 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

except that the whole argument was based upon a political candidate who had the ability to defeat Trump. but, you know..... go ahead and move the goal posts because... #orangemanbad.

What argument? What does an argument have to do with what Trump did? 

 

And you constant argument that the goal posts posts are being moved does not fit the the post. Do you just repeat that because it sounds cool to you? 

2 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I've been saying this all along.  If Donald really did do that whole call etc to dig up dirt on Biden he is even dumber than I thought.  You don't need to dig up dirt on Biden.  He arrives at campaign stops with 2 dump trucks full of dirt.  AND, he provides new dirt on a monthly basis if not more often.

I disagree about the dirt, it’s just that he isn’t a very good campaigner at all. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Joshin' said:

I am not trying to be a smart alec, but what are progressive economic policies?  I understand growth oriented policies but not progressive economics.  Where have those worked for a sustained period of time?

.

In America actually. You could make the case that we already have socialism as defined by the masses and not the true sense of the word(means of production, etc).

 

The top marginal tax rate for the 1%'ers was near 90 percent during the time period Trump references as "great." That's far too high, so I'm glad it's been adjusted, but that was an actual thing. 

 

Social security could be defined as socialism although the caveat is that (some) pay into the system. So there's that.

 

People already have access to free healthcare at any emergency room in the country, so there's that. 

 

FDR enacted the minimum wage, so there's that. You could make a case (and many do) that a federal minimum wage in itself is socialism. 

 

What people are really fighting about in terms of economic policy is whether you want MORE "socialism" or less. I'm in favor of a $15 dollar minimum wage. If a business can't pay it's employees a living wage, maybe they're not viable. As a matter of fact, if the minimum wage were adjusted for inflation it would be roughly 19/hr. I'm in favor of universal healthcare. We have the most expensive system in the world and rank somewhere like 26TH! WRT outcomes. That flat out sucks. 

 

So yeah, when I think of the time period in which America was great, I think of a time when the CEO made 30x that of the common worker and not 400x. But that's just me.

 

At the end of the day, automation is going to present an economic problem "the likes of which we've never seen." We've got this little sugar high right now, but job loss due to automation has only scratched the bottom surface. People argue that we found our way through the industrial revolution, but this is different. 

 

We'll see what happens.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What argument? What does an argument have to do with what Trump did? 

 

And you constant argument that the goal posts posts are being moved does not fit the the post. Do you just repeat that because it sounds cool to you? ...

the argument for Trumps impeachment was based upon election interference. the premise was that he was trying to rig the '20 election by trying to smear the leading opposition candidate against him. you're trying to move the goalpost by saying, "...Trump abuse his office to hurt a guy who couldn’t get in the top three in Iowa ..." is indeed goalpost moving.

 

:lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

the argument for Trumps impeachment was based upon election interference. the premise was that he was trying to rig the '20 election by trying to smear the leading opposition candidate against him. you're trying to move the goalpost by saying, "...Trump abuse his office to hurt a guy who couldn’t get in the top three in Iowa ..." is indeed goalpost moving.

 

:lol:

Trump bought the argument, and got impeached for it, and Biden turns out not to be worth it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...