Jump to content

Lindsey Graham - The Evolution of a Trump Cultist (But mostly continued Bob Obsession)


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


You are coming at this with the assumption that those starting these threads are doing so in good faith.  I have called them troll threads for a good reason; they usually are threads trolling.

Another issue you may be unaware of is one of trolls down here *cough*Tibs*cough* has a bad habit of deleting threads that do not turn out quite like he originally expected.  Some decent information has been lost in these threads where good discussion, source materials, and excellent debate has gone on. It is disheartening to contribute to one of these threads only to have it go *poof!* months (or years) later.

 

I can see that would be frustrating.  I have a lot of good insult posts of DR that I would hate to lose.  lol

 

Again though, the easiest thing to do is not post in a thread or reply to a poster that you don't like or consider a troll.  Be best!      :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  I don't think  that you thoroughly read her response which includes being able to post indiscriminate material in any thread if one chooses to do so.  You are lobbying that loony left threads be kept free from snarkiness while lefties should be free to completely chit bomb conservative leaning threads.  

But that's their MO. It's the only way they can try to level the playing field, since their ideas are such schitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Thank you for a reasoned reply.  I appreciate it.

 

I was just pointing out that the tactic is a type of bullying and that it will lead to silencing other posters and their opinions.  Is that good or bad?  Up to each to decide if they want to hear differing opinions or if they just want agreement from posters they like.

 

Oh, and I also wanted to point out a 'troll thread' is actually just your opinion.  It may not be viewed that way by others, like me for instance.


Gary is OBJECTIVELY a troll who adds nothing to this site. 
 

It’s not subjective — unless you’re being a dishonest asshat. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  I don't think  that you thoroughly read her response which includes being able to post indiscriminate material in any thread if one chooses to do so.  You are lobbying that loony left threads be kept free from snarkiness while lefties should be free to completely chit bomb conservative leaning threads.  

 

I really did not say that at all.  I don't think anyone should be shouted down, left, right, or center.   Post where ever you wish just admit that this tactic is actually an attempt to silence opinions you don't like.  On this type of board, one could more easily not read and/or not respond.  One man's troll thread may be another man's chance to vent with like minded posters.

 

Yes I know the original post is actually still present but once buried in pages of nonsense, the discussion and points get lost.  You know this.  If that is the type of discussion board the mob wants, that is what the mob will get.  Again, don't participate in mob bullying.  Be best

Edited by Bob in Mich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I really did not say that at all.  I don't think anyone should be shouted down, left, right, or center.   Post where ever you wish just admit that this tactic is actually an attempt to silence opinions you don't like.  On this type of board, one could more easily not read and/or not respond.  One man's troll thread may be another man's chance to vent with like minded posters.

 

Yes I know the original post is still actually still present but once buried in pages of nonsense, the discussion and points get lost.  You know this.  If that is the type of discussion board the mob wants, that is what the mob will get.  Again, don't participate in mob bullying.  Be best

  Bob, the original post IS nonsense.  If that discussion interests you or is relevant to you then you are completely free to pursue it.  You have a choice in terms of not viewing content that you dislike which is use the ignore function.  All this aside what is truly bothering you?  Is there some socially liberal practice that you want to pursue or are already pursuing that is frowned upon by most of society?  Don't worry about it as long as it does not bring harm against another person or that you are making somebody engage in behavior that they normally would not engage in.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nanker said:

The evolution of a Busey:

giphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gifgiphy.gif

 

 

 

 

  If the real Busey could have only looked 30 years into the future from 1989 I am sure he would have been way more protective of his public image.  

3 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

 

When Bob started this line of discussion I thought he was on the level, but I'm beginning to wonder if he's posting from underneath a bridge.

  I saw some hobo near the Transit Rd change up with I90.  Looked quite spacious under there.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Bob, the original post IS nonsense.  If that discussion interests you or is relevant to you then you are completely free to pursue it.  You have a choice in terms of not viewing content that you dislike which is use the ignore function.  All this aside what is truly bothering you?  Is there some socially liberal practice that you want to pursue or are already pursuing that is frowned upon by most of society?  Don't worry about it as long as it does not bring harm against another person or that you are making somebody engage in behavior that they normally would not engage in.  

 

I disagree with your first sentence and that is the point.  You may not, but I would enjoy discussing just what a worm Lindsey Graham has become.  If that is something not interesting to you, do not read or post in the thread. 

 

If you wish to participate in a mob like action to silence opposing views, you are free to do that.  Just be aware of the eventual impact and admit that you are bullying to silence opinions and stymie discussions that you don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I know Republican Congressional integrity is hard to find these days.  Who do you think has the most integrity among Repubs in Congress?  At one time folks would have mentioned Lindsey in that discussion but I can't imagine his name ever being brought up again. 

 

Let's discuss!    Isn't he a real butt kisser?

 

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I disagree with your first sentence and that is the point.  You may not, but I would enjoy discussing just what a worm Lindsey Graham has become.  If that is something not interesting to you, do not read or post in the thread. 

 

If you wish to participate in a mob like action to silence opposing views, you are free to do that.  Just be aware of the eventual impact and admit that you are bullying to silence opinions and stymie discussions that you don't like.

  Then you truly lack reading comprehension among other issues.  The title of the thread is to imply that Graham is some mindless devotee of Trump's which is not evident much less proven.  If you want to talk about being generally corrupt or part of the DC swamp then that discussion may have some merit and therefore worth pursuing by those who want to pursue it.  I'll admit that there is a lot I don't know about Graham but Graham being a long term part of the DC establishment make me think that he would be an Anti-Trumper as Trump would be a hindrance to his activities if fully unearthed.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Then you truly lack reading comprehension among other issues.  The title of the thread is to imply that Graham is some mindless devotee of Trump's which is not evident much less proven.  If you want to talk about being generally corrupt or part of the DC swamp then that discussion may have some merit and therefore worth pursuing by those who want to pursue it.  I'll admit that there is a lot I don't know about Graham but Graham being a long term part of the DC establishment make me think that he would be an Anti-Trumper as Trump would be a hindrance to his activities if fully unearthed.

 

Rob, opinions are like.....   Your stating an opinion on Graham, is just that, your opinion.  My opinion my differ.  A post you consider nonsense, I may not consider to be such. 

 

Why should your opinion (and resulting shout down actions) overrule the opinions of others here?   Why should the mob be encouraged to essentially ruin posts or to shout down opposing views?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Rob, opinions are like.....   Your stating an opinion on Graham, is just that, your opinion.  My opinion my differ.  A post you consider nonsense, I may not consider to be such. 

 

Why should your opinion (and resulting shout down actions) overrule the opinions of others here?   Why should the mob be encouraged to essentially ruin posts or to shout down opposing views?

  You've learned nothing this morning which is not surprising in the least.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Rob, opinions are like.....   Your stating an opinion on Graham, is just that, your opinion.  My opinion my differ.  A post you consider nonsense, I may not consider to be such. 

 

Why should your opinion (and resulting shout down actions) overrule the opinions of others here?   Why should the mob be encouraged to essentially ruin posts or to shout down opposing views?

Why are you hijacking this thread to pontificate about something other than the thread topic?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Why should your opinion (and resulting shout down actions) overrule the opinions of others here?   Why should the mob be encouraged to essentially ruin posts or to shout

down opposing views?

 

It doesn't. No one opinion does. That's the point. You're too much of a fascist to understand people can tune out what they do not wish to engage with on their own, without the need to police others. 

 

Get bent, asshat.

5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Why are you hijacking this thread to pontificate about something other than the thread topic?

 

Because he has nothing to offer this board. 

Just now, Bob in Mich said:

 

Pointing out how mob bullying can ruin threads and discussions, is quite relevant to this thread. 

 

 

Here's a tip -- if you're going to choose this hill to die on, get a better standard bearer than Gary who does nothing but bully and troll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...