Jump to content

Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Serious question, do you think Putin or other world leaders have a shred of respect for her?  Doubtful and her brand has to be at an all-time low right now.  She couldn't have played this loss to Trump any worse than she has.  Her ego and thirst for power and control won't allow her to self assess.  Your side should be embarrassed having invested so much in her only to see her true awful character come through over the past 3 years.   

Putin was afraid of her. That was pretty obvious. She was pushing exactly what he hated, a pro democracy foreign policy and she called him out directly for stealing Russian elections. He's a murderous thug who uses murder, terrorism and armed aggression to advance Russian policy. Hillary was the hawk he didn't want to face. 

 

Thats why they labeled her as reckless and about to

start WW3 

1 hour ago, Albwan said:

Well according to her, it didn't work. She won.

She's bat %$#@ crazy. Talk about a cult, she is the ultimate cult leader.

But nobody really likes her. That's not cultish at all. Your love for Dear Leader Trump is cultish 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

“Christian Man Bad”?

You're forgetting when Pence once let his dog ride in the car with the window open. He also gave a perfect stranger a head cold. Nothing compares though with the time in 5th grade when he got in a shoving match with another kid during recess. Pence is damaged goods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

You're forgetting when Pence once let his dog ride in the car with the window open. He also gave a perfect stranger a head cold. Nothing compares though with the time in 5th grade when he got in a shoving match with another kid during recess. Pence is damaged goods.

 

Tough sell.  Where's the neo-Assyrian raspberry emoji when you need it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

"You people with this phony Emoluments Clause" - Donald Trump

 

Can you follow up with Schiff's opening statement on the Ukraine transcript?  

 

… I take that, as a no?

Edited by GG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Can you follow up with Schiff's opening statement on the Ukraine transcript?  

 

Literally - this thread is about Trump's comments on the constitution he took an oath to uphold 

 

"You people with this phony Emoluments Clause" - Donald Trump - literally Donald Trump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

"You people with this phony Emoluments Clause" - Donald Trump

 

He probably meant "You phony people with this Emoluments Clause."

 

For a guy you readily admit can't put together coherent thoughts, you're awfully quick to credit his thoughts with coherence.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Literally - this thread is about Trump's comments on the constitution he took an oath to uphold 

 

"You people with this phony Emoluments Clause" - Donald Trump - literally Donald Trump

 

That's why I'm asking you to post the "literal" statement made by the presiding chair of the House committee to compare notes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"George Washington they say had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk. I don't think you people with this phony Emoluments Clause -- and by the way, I would say that it's cost me anywhere from two to five billion dollars to bepresident. And that's okay."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

"George Washington they say had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk. I don't think you people with this phony Emoluments Clause -- and by the way, I would say that it's cost me anywhere from two to five billion dollars to bepresident. And that's okay."

 

Thanks! This isn't any better - he's almost as much of a moron as 3rd thing

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gary Busey said:

 

Then he should probably correct it

 

:lol:

 

First, what good would that do?  You've already got your meme.

 

Second...when has this overgrown child ever admitted error?

 

And third...he got what he wanted out of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

 I don't understand how you can't think Trump is corrupt.

 

It's very, very simple. 

 

The United States Intelligence Community had him under the most invasive surveillance for over a full calendar year -- and then had another year and a half of unlimited subpoena and investigatory power. During that time the mission at hand wasn't just to find out about Trump/Russia and the '16 election, but to find any crime or wrong doing they could use to unseat him. After all that investigation -- they found: 

 

* That he slept / paid for a porn star and playmate before he was in office

* That he possibly obstructed justice of a crime that did not exist/happen

 

That's it. Nothing else was found despite the digging and illegal surveillance and investigation. Had Trump not paid a parking ticket, you would have seen front page story after front page story -- let alone had he done anything corrupt they could pin him with. 

 

That's the true legacy of Mueller's probe which no one in the media will touch because it destroys the narrative they've programmed into your head for three years -- not only that he committed treason (didn't happen), but that he's the most corrupt person ever to be in office. The reality is, he's cleaner than ANYONE who was looking into him. He's cleaner than Obama (major corruption under his leadership), cleaner than Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer, Ryan, and most of the House, cleaner than Clinton... 

 

They never expected that he would end up being clean. That's why they went all in on fraudulent FISAs and improper/illegal CI investigations into a sitting president. They figured he HAD to be at least as dirty as they, the DC establishment creatures, are.

 

Turns out he's not. 

 

That's not me making assumptions. That's not me stating my opinion. That's what multiple investigations produced. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GG said:

 

That's why I'm asking you to post the "literal" statement made by the presiding chair of the House committee to compare notes.

 

Were you personally fooled by Schiff's opening statement?  Since Trump already released the actual 'transcript' a day or two before, I would be curious how many people were fooled into thinking this was Trump's exact words from the call.   I certainly knew he was paraphrasing and possibly exaggerating.  Were you personally aware of the transcript prior to hearing Schiff's admittedly ill advised parody?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...