Jump to content

Concussion Protocol: NHL v. NFL


Mango

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, PolishPrince said:

Sounds like you are in stage 2 of the protocol 

I played organized youth hockey and football ages 9-16. ('68-'75)

 

Got my "bell wrung" more times than I can remember.

 

Last few years of football they'd wave smelling salts under our noses to bring us around.

 

The good old days, when pain was a badge of honor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

Maybe it's because hockey season is 18 months long.

 

Season length shouldn’t have an effect on recovery time. You’ve either recovered or you haven’t. At least not without putting serious long term health in question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Season length shouldn’t have an effect on recovery time. You’ve either recovered or you haven’t. At least not without putting serious long term health in question. 

 

hockey hits are often at higher velocity and the players tend to have more mass to contribute

 

and after viewing the hardest of NHL hits, most were delivered without a clue that they were coming, no chance to brace oneself, in the NFL you have to be expecting to get hit hard every time you are carrying the ball.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory, an NFL player does not clear protocol until he can participate in a non contact practice and his brain scan remains at base. The only thing I think they could do to be more cautious is to require a scan following participation in a contact practice situation, to see if his scan is still baseline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mango said:

 

I originally read an old article. Just found this one which is more up to date. I guess NFL players spend an average of 16 days off the field now. Feels like that isn’t the case. But I guess it is. Probably just seems that way because of guys like Allen or Tyrod who are down for just a bit. Then you see a guy like crosby basically lose a season. 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/2604023

 

basically this deems my entire post invalid until I can find updated NHL data. ?

Yeah, you see guys miss a long time in the NFL too, so I was initially surprised by your 6 day number. But regardless, concussions are an issue and teams are always juggling their desire to win with their desire to keep their guys healthy. Always a tough position.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the hits in hockey that cause concussions happening at a greater rate of speed and velocity than NFL hits, thus producing more injurious results ? While NFL football is a far more physically taxing game than hockey ( no way you couldn’t play that many games and have enough healthy bodies in football) the speeds hockey players reach flying around the ice would appear greater than a player that is running on grass or turf. Maybe I’m way off base, idk. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:


yup, that was a horrible cheap shot

 

 

I remember his 1997 good bye to Buffalo message in the Buffalo news. Great player, great guy.

15 hours ago, row_33 said:

Pat LaFontaine...  :(

 

 

It made me sick to witness the cheap shots on LaFontaine. Guys couldn't slow him down...so they resorted to violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mango said:

What is it about the two leagues or sports that have such different turn around times when diagnosed with a concussion.

 

In the NFL if a guy misses 3 weeks for a concussion, it is an eternity. JA and a ton of other players come back the next week. A guy like Sidney Crosby misses almost a year. 30% of the NHL misses at least 10 days before going back to practice. The NFL averages about 6 days.

 

Seems like one league/sport is treading more carefully than the other. 


82 games vs 16 games. 
 

run those numbers with that in mind and % of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:

 

 

The 2 biggest differences is the schedule and the IR rules.  It has little to do with treatment.

 

NFL - the player is on the active roster and the team can let him sit for essentially a week before being in the next game.  They cannot use IR to bring additional players in and the missing 1 NFL game is equivalent to missing over 5 NHL games - which for Buffalo Sabres - 5 games missed would mean the next game from last night would be 10/17 - a full 2 weeks after the 1st game.

 

NHL - they have a 7 day IR available- so if they get even a minor concussion they will be placed on that and get replaced by an active player.  This allows a minimum of 7 days - plus any additional days before the next game.  If a Sabre got concussed last night and went on the 7 day IR - their next game would be 10/14 - 10 days after the concussion - even if he was cleared prior to the 7 days - he would still be missing the days.

 

It is very hard to equate the two sports between the rules and the timing of the games.  Looking at it both seem to clear most players in 5-7 days - for the NFL that gets them ready for the next game - In the NHL they miss more games, but a smaller percentage of the season and the individual player is not missed because of the 7 day IR.

 

But it’s not the team clearing guys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

 

But it’s not the team clearing guys 

 

 

No, but you don’t think that has an impact on when guys get tested?

 

Overall the data shows little difference for most players in clearance.  The difference seems mostly dictated in when the games are played.

 

The other big difference is the NFL takes players off at a sign of a big hit to the head - getting the player out of the game.

 

The NHL it still seems to be a major emphasis on the player and in some cases it might be shifts or even days after the hit that caused the concussion before the player is diagnosed and I think the NHL misses significantly  more concussions than the NFL - so the ones they find are a tad bit worse.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...