Jump to content

Buffalo Sabres and NHL: 2019/20: Sabres season officially over. Draft lottery June 26th


BillsFan4

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

Hmm, they gotta win one their not supposed right? Little baby bet on em +230, little parley bet them and the Colts 14-1 odds. Both team have to win outright

 

btw, combines bet about 1/3 of a unit for me, so ain’t got a lot of confidence but keeps out the OTB and losing triple that!. 

Wow first goal in 4 games without Eichel scoring or assisting.  Maybe next they can score one when he isn't on the ice.  Effort appears to be there tonight.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Rask pulled that save on Rod, you knew it wasn’t going to be their night.

 

Still best effort in more than a month.  This is how they started the season.  Hope they keep it up and fix the penalty kill.  That was the difference again.

 

 Looks like Risto is the new guy in front of the net.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

https://theathletic.com/1398426/2019/11/21/sabres-assistant-don-granato-on-near-death-experience-youve-got-about-5-minutes-and-you-will-not-be-here/?source=shared-article

 

Sabres assistant Don Granato on near-death experience: ‘You’ve got about 5 minutes and you will not be here

 

 

 

 

Wow! I figured it had to be pretty bad for him to be out this long, but I didn’t know the extent. Sounds like he came very close to dying. 

 

Glad he’s back and feeling better! 

Damn, that hits too close to home. Glad he has recovered!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

I’m actually enjoying the Boston game so far. 

 

Everyone actually looks like they give a crap tonight. Everyone giving an effort again, trying to win their puck battles and they’re back to Playing the style Ralph wants them to play. 

 

I cant take the losses where 2/3rds of the team looks like they don’t care. But if I see an honest effort and they lose because the other team’s more skilled, then fine. I an live with that and continue to root these guys on. But if/when they don’t care, why should I?

 

 

The attached link is Buffalo News column on the game by Lance Lysowski. As you indicated the effort was there but this team doesn't have much margin of error. Their PK is hurting them badly. In this game the 5 on 5 play was fairly even. When they were short-handed the other team converted.

 

What's impressive about the Bruins is that they have a grinding and unrelenting style of play that is evident throughout the game. In the first period we dominated the play but after that the Bruins returned to form playing their tough brand of hockey. They are not a team full of stylish players like Tampa as much as they are a team throughout all their lines that all play the same style of hardnosed hockey. This is a team that plays a playoff style of hockey in the regular season. I don't particularly like them but my hats off to them. 

 

https://buffalonews.com/2019/11/21/buffalo-sabres-boston-bruins-ralph-krueger-evan-rodrigues-rasmus-ristolainen-brandon-montour-nhl-news-2019/

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2019 at 6:42 AM, 4merper4mer said:

I don't claim to know all the X's and O's when it comes to hockey but I have a basic understanding of human nature and I can usually tell when someone is bad at their job.

 

I'll start with the good:. I think Krueger is good at his job.  He schemed us and motivated us into a good start to the season.  Schemes get figured out and motivation waxes and wanes when applied to people who are overmatched.  Given the  right ingredients, it  appears to me Krueger could be a guy that wins consistently.  But:

 

The lazy Jason Botterill is currently supplying the ingredients.  I understand that patience is needed in developing a team but urgency is also required.  Botts clearly lacks any urgency whatsoever.  An example is Kyle Okposo.  He seems like a genuinely good person and once was a good hockey player. I wish him 100000% the best with is current unfortunate injury.  With that said, can anyone honestly say that a GM that cared about winning would have left him on a roster this long?  None of this is on Okposo, he is working for his family and I don't see a lack of effort.....just ability.  It's on the GM.  There are also younger players that are simply not living up to where they were picked or not developing at a reasonable pace.  One of them is a SECOND line center.  In addition, it is beginning to look possible that we are ruining the best defensive prospect in multiple generations.  I think his talent will ultimately turn things around, but the fact that this is even a possibility is inexcusable.  All of the above is bad enough but Botts' lack of grasp on reality is likely to leave him flat footed when:

 

Human nature ultimately kicks in and Eichel asks out.  This could happen sooner than we thought and once it does, it will be too late.  How long should Eichel have to wait?  Fans are one thing and they deserve to be frustrated.  Eichel goes into work every day and on none of them, in all of this time, has he had the luxury of knowing things are moving in the right direction.  This type of thing wears on people.  Can anyone name one thing Botterill has done that would instill confidence in a player like Jack that a Stanley Cup winning organization is a realistic possibility during his career?  He has got a long time left but he has also been here a long time already and currently Seattle looks like they are in a stronger position than Buffalo, and they literally do not exist.

 

Botts has to go.  I hope they retain Krueger, but Botts has to go.

 

 

This is the reason i stay off of sports talk radio. 

 

Skinner - Montour - "Botts is great, he's the best!" 

 

Can't find a trade partner - "Move on from Botts, blow him up!" 

 

 Player not playing well - "Trade Okposo for Johnny Goo! come on Botts!" 

 

I just can't stand hearing this stuff. It has no basis in reality. It just reeks of passed off opinions from a crazy radio show, or someones wacky neighbor that doesn't even watch the games. What can we possibly do with Okposo? At the time it was an excellent signing. Top free agent, took a favorable deal. How could anyone know it would go as poorly as it had? 

 

With that said, he currently has zero value, what do you propose we do? 

 

I wont even address the Botts nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Makes sense. I am sure that’s why Botterill was talking up how important his defensive depth is in that interview before Thursday’s game. 

 

I am actually ok with him waiting for a better offer. I don’t like making trades just for the sake of making a trade. Only make a trade if it improves the team, and I don’t see how dumping Scandella for crap makes the Sabres better. I’d rather Botterill make no trade than make a bad trade that doesn’t really help the Sabres. 

 

Plus, IMO, I think once you start completely caving in on your trade demands, it makes it that much harder to get proper value in future trades. GMs are like sharks and can smell blood in the water. You can’t let them take advantage of you unless you want to keep getting taken advantage of.

 

Eventually a team in need of a defenseman will offer up something of value. Maybe after thanksgiving, when GMs have a better idea of what their team is this season and where they are in relation to making the playoffs. Plus, the Sabres schedule gets back closer to normal after November. Right now they’re making up games from the time off they got for the Sweden trip.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JohnC said:

The attached link is Buffalo News column on the game by Lance Lysowski. As you indicated the effort was there but this team doesn't have much margin of error. Their PK is hurting them badly. In this game the 5 on 5 play was fairly even. When they were short-handed the other team converted.

 

What's impressive about the Bruins is that they have a grinding and unrelenting style of play that is evident throughout the game. In the first period we dominated the play but after that the Bruins returned to form playing their tough brand of hockey. They are not a team full of stylish players like Tampa as much as they are a team throughout all their lines that all play the same style of hardnosed hockey. This is a team that plays a playoff style of hockey in the regular season. I don't particularly like them but my hats off to them. 

 

https://buffalonews.com/2019/11/21/buffalo-sabres-boston-bruins-ralph-krueger-evan-rodrigues-rasmus-ristolainen-brandon-montour-nhl-news-2019/

 

Yes, agreed. I’ve been impressed by the bruins consistent style of play for years now. They know how to win games. 

 

Even when the Sabres prospects play the (usually much less talented) Bruins prospects in those tournaments here every summer, I am always struck by how well coached the bruins prospects are. Their prospects always seem to play that same consistent, “bruins” style of hockey. 

 

I am really hoping that Krueger can implement something similar here in Buffalo. I know he’s trying to...

He wants the Sabres playing with that same unrelenting pressure on the puck/puck carrier that the Bruins play with, and he’s trying to establish it from Cincinnati (our ECHL team) to Buffalo. I am hoping with some more time that it starts to stick. It was definitely nice to see them get back to that style of play last night.

 

 

 

And yep, Sabres margin for error is razor thin. To even have a chance at winning, they need everyone engaged in every puck battle and giving 100% every shift like last night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bobby Hooks said:

This is the reason i stay off of sports talk radio. 

 

Skinner - Montour - "Botts is great, he's the best!" 

 

Can't find a trade partner - "Move on from Botts, blow him up!" 

 

 Player not playing well - "Trade Okposo for Johnny Goo! come on Botts!" 

 

I just can't stand hearing this stuff. It has no basis in reality. It just reeks of passed off opinions from a crazy radio show, or someones wacky neighbor that doesn't even watch the games. What can we possibly do with Okposo? At the time it was an excellent signing. Top free agent, took a favorable deal. How could anyone know it would go as poorly as it had? 

 

With that said, he currently has zero value, what do you propose we do? 

 

I wont even address the Botts nonsense. 

Signings aren't good or bad when they happen; they are dependent on results.  Okposo was certainly not an excellent signing.  I get that one was Murray.

 

The Vesey move was just dumb as well as Sheary.  Add in the commitment to Mittestadt, Erod, and some others and no GM in his right mind would think he had a viable team.  Jimmy friggin Vesey is skating on the first line.  For the love of God what is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

 

 

Makes sense. I am sure that’s why Botterill was talking up how important his defensive depth is in that interview before Thursday’s game. 

 

I am actually ok with him waiting for a better offer. I don’t like making trades just for the sake of making a trade. Only make a trade if it improves the team, and I don’t see how dumping Scandella for crap makes the Sabres better. I’d rather Botterill make no trade than make a bad trade that doesn’t really help the Sabres. 

 

Plus, IMO, I think once you start completely caving in on your trade demands, it makes it that much harder to get proper value in future trades. GMs are like sharks and can smell blood in the water. You can’t let them take advantage of you unless you want to keep getting taken advantage of.

 

Eventually a team in need of a defenseman will offer up something of value. Maybe after thanksgiving, when GMs have a better idea of what their team is this season and where they are in relation to making the playoffs. Plus, the Sabres schedule gets back closer to normal after November. Right now they’re making up games from the time off they got for the Sweden trip.

Scandella is playing well. But his value isn't that great because he's in the last year of his contract. Montour is a legitimate second pairing, and maybe first pairing defenseman. Next season he will be a RFA. So because of his contract status I'm not sure how much you will get in return. Bogo certainly doesn't have much trade value because of his injury history and also his contract status. According to Paul Hamilton from WGR he stated that Botts is strenuously working the phones but constructing a fair trade deal isn't as easy as many make it out to be. There is no doubt that Risto has value on the market. But if the return isn't commensurate to the value going out it would be foolish to make a deal for the sake of making a deal. Risto certainly has some value on the market but he also has value on our team. Although he receives a lot of criticisms from some upset fans he is currently our anchor defenseman who gets more ice time than any other player on this roster. 

 

As you suggested if a good deal isn't available now then wait until the market is more receptive for fair market deals. If they don't materialize then stay the course. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://wgr550.radio.com/articles/news/sabres-place-gilmour-on-waivers

 

John Gilmour waived. Bogosian looks ready to return. 

 

 

 

8 hours ago, JohnC said:

Darren Dreger was on WGR's Instigator show talking about trade scenarios and complications. He also talked about the Toronto situation. This is a 14 min segment. 

 

https://wgr550.radio.com/media/audio-channel/11-22-tsns-darren-dreger-with-the-instigators

 

Interesting to hear that Botterill hopes to make a couple trades (for forwards) within the next couple weeks. Dreger says he’s very active on the trade market. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

https://wgr550.radio.com/articles/news/sabres-place-gilmour-on-waivers

 

John Gilmour waived. Bogosian looks ready to return. 

 

 

 

 

Interesting to hear that Botterill hopes to make a couple trades (for forwards) within the next couple weeks. Dreger says he’s very active on the trade market. 

 

Expecting Bogo to be a defenseman to fill in the ranks of a traded defenseman or two is a risky proposition. He is too injury prone. The number of injuries and surgeries he has accumulated makes him a vulnerable (less than durable)  player. In my view he needs to drastically alter his style of play from a banger and enforcer to more of a puck moving player. 

 

The player who will be moving up to the big club if there is a deal is Pilut. Will Risto be dealt? If the GM wants a second line forward he is the only player on the defensive unit who has enough value to bring us a second line forward. And it might take additional assets beyond Risto to bring in a forward who is capable of scoring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnC said:

Is Hall interested in signing with the Devils or are the Devils looking to trade Hall? 


No and no.

 

Shero is asleep at the wheel and as far as I’m concerned, Hall can go. The Devils could easily be the worst team in hockey without him.

 

Hall’s value is next to nothing right now. 
 

It’s a real shytshow in Newark right now and don’t mean just the city itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, njbuff said:


No and no.

 

Shero is asleep at the wheel and as far as I’m concerned, Hall can go. The Devils could easily be the worst team in hockey without him.

 

Hall’s value is next to nothing right now. 
 

It’s a real shytshow in Newark right now and don’t mean just the city itself.

 

Never should have left Denver. Ha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Yeah, the 20+ years of success in NJ from 1992 to 2012 is just awful (one losing season).

Mickey Mouse organization!?

 

wonder what Gretz would call the Sabres of the last 10 years. 

 

BTW, gunna try to beak the jinx and not bet the moneyline for the Panthers game ,  so for all you gamblers out there you should prolly load up on the Sabres to win. 

Edited by plenzmd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, njbuff said:


No and no.

 

Shero is asleep at the wheel and as far as I’m concerned, Hall can go. The Devils could easily be the worst team in hockey without him.

 

Hall’s value is next to nothing right now. 
 

It’s a real shytshow in Newark right now and don’t mean just the city itself.

Not that long ago Taylor Hall was an MVP in the league. So obviously he is a premier talent. He has been dealing with injuries and a season that hasn't gotten off the ground for the Devils, a team with grand expectations after securing the first pick in  the last draft. In hockey, as in a lot of sports,  a change of scenery can revitalize a talented but dormant player. The problem in this case is that he is on an expiring contract so any team that is interested in dealing off a lot of assets for this talented but struggling player is taking a gamble because they don't know if he will be a free agent after this season. The Sabres took a gamble in trading for Skinner but we knew in advance because of his limited no-trade clause that Buffalo was a location he was willing to go to. Would I risk trading a Risto for Hall? No, because of the risk of losing him to free agency. If I give up an asset I want a secure asset back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

Mickey Mouse organization!?

 

wonder what Gretz would call the Sabres of the last 10 years. 

 

BTW, gunna try to beak the jinx and not bet the moneyline for the Panthers game ,  so for all you gamblers out there you should prolly load up on the Sabres to win. 

Is there an over/under on how many games before the Sabres actually score a goal when Eichel is not on the ice?  It's been 4+ games since this wonderful roster assembled by the genius golfer gas scored a single goal in that manner.  Eichel has scored all but three of those goals, he assisted on two of those and was on the ice for the other.

Edited by 4merper4mer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JohnC said:

. Would I risk trading a Risto for Hall? No, because of the risk of losing him to free agency. If I give up an asset I want a secure asset back. 

I say 100% yes, get Risto contract off the books, even if ya just get picks back. Risto is not GOOD, his reputation is good. Now granted, if you can find the odd GM like Chiarelli that still believes in the "eye" test, maybe you can get a Top 9 forward back for him. But modern GMs like Dubas will  go nowhere near Risto...thats why he sits on the Sabres till this day.

 

Its just like any other asset..there is mo inherit "worth" in the asset, its "worth" is what someone is willing to pay for it. No one is willing to pay for Risto at this point

37 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Is there an over/under on how many games before the Sabres actually score a goal when Eichel is not on the ice?  It's been 4+ games since this wonderful roster assembled by the genius golfer gas scored a single goal in that manner.  Eichel has scored all but three of those goals, he assisted on two of those and was on the ice for the other.

well, they just waived the top rated "forward" from the Wild game...so what does that tell ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://wgr550.radio.com/articles/news/chris-taylor-is-going-back-to-being-the-head-coach-in-roch

 

Chris Taylor is headed back to Rochester to take over head coaching duties again. 

Hopefully it was a good learning experience for him. 

 

I was actually pretty impressed with the job Gord Dineen has done in Taylor’s place. 

 

The Amerks are tied for 1st. They are tied with the Marlies at 25pts. The very best team in the AHL so far this season has 29pts, but with 2 more games played. 

So Dineen has the Amerks right there with the best AHL teams, even with all the call-ups and injuries (rochester’s had quite a few). 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:

I say 100% yes, get Risto contract off the books, even if ya just get picks back. Risto is not GOOD, his reputation is good. Now granted, if you can find the odd GM like Chiarelli that still believes in the "eye" test, maybe you can get a Top 9 forward back for him. But modern GMs like Dubas will  go nowhere near Risto...thats why he sits on the Sabres till this day.

 

 

As usual I disagree with your logic and reasoning. If you can't get a second line forward in return in a Risto trade then I say keep him. Risto is a flawed player like most players are. He's certainly not the greatest thinker on the ice. However, he is one of the few physical players on a mostly soft roster. Also, there are reasons why Krueger gives him more ice time than any player on the team. And there are reasons why he plays the Risto/McCabe combo in critical end of game scenarios rather than the first pairing of Montour/Dahlin in those type of close out situations. 

 

I'm not against trading anyone other than Jack and Dahlin. The underlying basis for any trade deal is at the minimum commensurate value back. You may not be reluctant to make impulsive and reactionary deals but I am. 

Edited by JohnC
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

https://www.nhl.com/sabres/news/sabres-john-gilmour-rochester-americans/c-311679120

 

Gilmour cleared waivers (no surprise) and was assigned to Rochester. 

It wasn't too long ago that the Sabres had one of the worst and thinnest blue line units. In a relatively short time JBotts bolstered this unit with the additions of Miller, Montour and Jokiharju thus providing some trade ammunition to address other needs.  I'm hoping that with a few deals this year and with an offseason where we are in good cap shape that GM can upgrade the forward lines. I'm aware how frustrated people get with the losing but if you stand back and put things in perspective the pieces are steadily being added. What I don't want to see is another ROR type deal that set this franchise back with his departure. The problem wasn't that he was dealt because there was some internal stuff that was happening that forced this deal. The problem was the inadequate return for this valuable asset. That is why I am so adamant that if a good deal can't be made with Risto or any player then bide your time and wait until a more balanced deal can be made. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

Bogo activated, Sobotka to LTIR...hmmm. Whos sittin for Bogo tomorrow? We all still gunna be good with Ralph if its Joki who sits?

I'm good with however Krueger wants to rotate his defensemen. Bogo has been out of action for a very long time. So I don't see him playing back to back games. If the erudite HC has a rotation among three or four players I'm fine with it. 

 

I'm a Joki fan. The trade to get him was a terrific deal for us. He may be the second youngest defenseman on the unit but he is arguably the most consistent player on the blue line. Players get dinged and trades get made so having a temporary excess of defensemen is a good problem to have. 

 

What  is the nature of Sobotka's injury? I'm not sure if it has been revealed by the organization? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

 

11 games at or above 50% expected goals. 11 games under 50%

 

They appear to be trending up again. Hopefully it sticks longer this time... 

 

 

https://thehockeywriters.com/sabres-process-not-results-2019-20/

 

Sabres article on hockey news. I know you’ll like this one, John!   ?

This was an excellent analysis of where the Sabres are currently at. My assessment of this team and organization matches the writer's assessment. As you well know I have frequently stated that this rebuilding of the roster was never going to be a quick process. Those despondent zealots who out of frustration are advocating for blowing up the roster are like runners who are running a marathon and are past the half-way point who then decide to go back to the starting line and start over again. That's a ridiculous and self-defeating approach to take. 

 

Clearly this team has obvious deficiencies with its lines. There simply aren't enough goal scorers who can convert when opportunities arise. On the plus side what we do have that is encouraging is an astute coach who is installing a system with a buy-in by the players. It was disappointing that the Sabres lost against the Bruins but it was encouraging how well they played against a cup caliber team.

 

I believe that this team and organization are moving in the right direction. We should be able to get some forward help through trades this season. I'm looking to enter this offseason with a favorable cap situation that will put us in a good position to make a couple more meaningful deals that will address our glaring deficiencies on our lines. I will repeat what I have been saying for the past year or so to the chorus of snickers: Stay the course and trust the process.  

 

 

Edited by JohnC
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, JohnC said:

This was an excellent analysis of where the Sabres are currently at. My assessment of this team and organization matches the writer's assessment. As you well know I have frequently stated that this rebuilding of the roster was never going to be a quick process. Those despondent zealots who out of frustration are advocating for blowing up the roster are like runners who are running a marathon and are past the half-way point who then decide to go back to the starting line and start over again. That's a ridiculous and self-defeating approach to take. 

 

Clearly this team has obvious deficiencies with its lines. There simply aren't enough goal scorers who can convert when opportunities arise. On the plus side what we do have that is encouraging is an astute coach who is installing a system with a buy-in by the players. It was disappointing that the Sabres lost against the Bruins but it was encouraging how well they played against a cup caliber team.

 

I believe that this team and organization are moving in the right direction. We should be able to get some forward help through trades this season. I'm looking to enter this offseason with a favorable cap situation that will put us in a good position to make a couple more meaningful deals that will address our glaring deficiencies on our lines. I will repeat what I have been saying for the past year or so to the chorus of snickers: Stay the course and trust the process.  

 

 

? Yes, for many years you have been saying that!!! ?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea of the the veracity of this tweet or the nature of the injuries.... but your up Bots!

 

 

 

Just read a game recap. One D man is expected to be fine, it is actually Beaulieu(sp)who needs more tests to determine injury. Our boy Dmitri Kulikov played a ton in the 3rd, and I guess played well. Add in Myers, Jets have to be happy how their farm team the Sabres develops D men for them, get it done BOTS!

 

Edited by plenzmd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillsFan4 said:

 

11 games at or above 50% expected goals. 11 games under 50%

 

They appear to be trending up again. Hopefully it sticks longer this time... 

 

 

https://thehockeywriters.com/sabres-process-not-results-2019-20/

 

Sabres article on hockey news. I know you’ll like this one, John!   ?

Does that chart give a prediction for the next time a goal will be scored without Eichel on the ice?  Let me guess.  The 12th?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, thebug said:

? Yes, for many years you have been saying that!!! ?

I will continue to say it because its the right course to take. Player development and smart deals such as the Skinner, Montour and  Joki deals steadily add to the talent base. JBotts is not doing anything differently from a franchise building standpoint that successful organizations do. For those who are arguing to blow up or dramatically alter the roster I say you are destructively misguided. My conviction is still to stay the course and when the opportunities exist to improve the roster through trades then make them. I'm confident that in the not too distant future this approach will prove to be successful.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, BillsFan4 said:

Both the Bills and Sabres looked good for an entire game and won. On the same day. 

 

 

I think I may play the lottery tomorrow... lol. 

I was only able to see the last two periods in this game. I thought that Ullmark was our #1 star in this game. On this road trip the Sabres have played well against Boston and Florida, two good teams. That's encouraging. 

 

Is Vesey ever going to score? He has had good chances. However, I won't criticize him for his effort. He's a consistent high effort player. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I will continue to say it because its the right course to take. Player development and smart deals such as the Skinner, Montour and  Joki deals steadily add to the talent base. JBotts is not doing anything differently from a franchise building standpoint that successful organizations do. For those who are arguing to blow up or dramatically alter the roster I say you are destructively misguided. My conviction is still to stay the course and when the opportunities exist to improve the roster through trades then make them. I'm confident that in the not too distant future this approach will prove to be successful.  

Eventually you will be right! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Nice to hear numerous prospected are playing well. 

 

Cozens is currently sitting atop the entire WHL, tied for the scoring lead with 1 less game played than the kid he’s tied with. 

 

https://www.quanthockey.com/whl/en/seasons/2019-20-whl-players-stats.html

 

It would be so huge for the Sabres if they really hit on that Cozens pick. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...