Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...isn't today Brennan's turn or did he call in sick?.............


Yeah. Today's the day he gets to have a chat where he gets to decide what to say while knowing Durham knows all, and being unsure what everyone else has said.  Sucks to be him.
 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Yeah. Today's the day he gets to have a chat where he gets to decide what to say while knowing Durham knows all, and being unsure what everyone else has said.  Sucks to be him.
 

 

Is anything REALLY going to happen to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Yeah. Today's the day he gets to have a chat where he gets to decide what to say while knowing Durham knows all, and being unsure what everyone else has said.  Sucks to be him.
 

 

The KC  plea deal a week prior is a good chess move by Durham.  Brennan had no problem lying to Congress, but to Durham Im guessing not so much. I hope he's shitting bricks.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

The KC  plea deal a week prior is a good chess move by Durham.  Brennan had no problem lying to Congress, but to Durham Im guessing not so much. I hope he's shitting bricks.


 

We can never tell. His face always looks like he’s shitting something.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

...handing Brennan a "get out of jail" card in hopes he'll be the next canary is wishful thinking on Durham's part.....his "pictorial puss" is a dead giveaway as far as an irritable bowel.........................

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Why in the world would anyone believe anything coming from Brennan and his PR people?

 

 

 

...you know damn well the "political hatchet job" on Durham is coming.......the SAME Durham that the illustrious Eric Holder handed several high profile cases to......so Durham was okay then but a hack now?........shocking (COUGH).............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The purpose of the interview was to get Brennan to confirm or deny information that others have provided up to this point about Brennan, and what he instructed others to do.

 

John Brennan was placed into a perjury trap yesterday because he’s shown himself willing to perjure himself in the past in order to evade scrutiny.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

The purpose of the interview was to get Brennan to confirm or deny information that others have provided up to this point about Brennan, and what he instructed others to do.

 

John Brennan was placed into a perjury trap yesterday because he’s shown himself willing to perjure himself in the past in order to evade scrutiny.

 

It truly amazes me that these people go forward with perjury trap interviews, rather than telling the investigators to ***** off.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


 

...doesn't the loquacious nature of Comey and Brennan send a clear message that the FBI/CIA are purportedly above the law , allowed to operate unchecked?....dirty deeds are an acceptable SOP.....their reach has NO bounds even if it is to be manipulated as a partisan political operative......so should they and their cohorts get a pass?.....can we logically and ethically continue to peddle the "world's greatest democracy" worldwide despite our "mounting pile of dirty laundry"?......hypocritical anyone??...........

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

It truly amazes me that these people go forward with perjury trap interviews, rather than telling the investigators to ***** off.

 

Brennan hasn't been willing or able to shut his trap since Trump was elected.  How many times did he (as an insider) accuse Trump of treason only to have the years of investigations come up empty?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Brennan hasn't been willing or able to shut his trap since Trump was elected.  How many times did he (as an insider) accuse Trump of treason only to have the years of investigations come up empty?

 

It's one thing to run your mouth with a compliant media, it's quite another to run your mouth to investigators who can charge you with giving false statements, if they simply disagree with how you phrased something.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Brennan hasn't been willing or able to shut his trap since Trump was elected.  How many times did he (as an insider) accuse Trump of treason only to have the years of investigations come up empty?

 

 

...Brennan will attempt to be Durham's "Eddie Haskell".......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

This is also why I've said for awhile that prosecuting a former head of an intel agency, let alone Langley, could pose serious NatSec issues when it comes to discovery let alone trial. I think they can wound Brennan by indicting his lieutenants (including Strzok and McCabe even though they're technically bureau), destroy what little is left of his reputation without bringing an indictment -- then he'll disappear or have an untimely accident like the kind he used to murder an American journalist on the streets of Los Angeles.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...