KRC Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: So, you support abortion for any reason at any point in time? How about a failed abortion, one in which the baby is born alive? Would you kill that baby? According to Tibs, you should be allowed to get rid of the undesirables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: So, you support abortion for any reason at any point in time? How about a failed abortion, one in which the baby is born alive? Would you kill that baby? Not sure about that one. How many children have you adopted that are waiting for homes? 1 minute ago, KRC said: According to Tibs, you should be allowed to get rid of the undesirables. Not that I say that, but how is that different from you guys wanting to tell terrorized refugees to just go back and get killed at the border? The very idea you animals have ANY moral standing at all is just pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Not that I say that, but how is that different from you guys wanting to tell terrorized refugees to just go back and get killed at the border? The very idea you animals have ANY moral standing at all is just pathetic. Where did I say that? I'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 Just now, KRC said: Where did I say that? I'll wait. Oh I'm sorry, so you are ok with the refugees coming to us for safety to save their lives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh I'm sorry, so you are ok with the refugees coming to us for safety to save their lives? You mean the ones who travel over a thousand miles through a safe country (where they are actually required to make their asylum claims) to get here for safety reasons to save their lives? Edited May 30, 2019 by Koko78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh I'm sorry, so you are ok with the refugees coming to us for safety to save their lives? Legally, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Oh I'm sorry, so you are ok with the refugees coming to us for safety to save their lives? I'll answer this. Yes, I'm ok with refugees. Give us your definition of a refugee though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 Game of Thrones’ Sophie Turner says she ‘can’t work in’ states with anti-abortion legislation (there’s just one problem) Hint: Northern Ireland's laws. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 (edited) 22 minutes ago, B-Man said: Game of Thrones’ Sophie Turner says she ‘can’t work in’ states with anti-abortion legislation (there’s just one problem) Hint: Northern Ireland's laws. Eh, Northern Ireland is a country/province/region within the UK, not a state. Therefore, anti-abortion legislation does not affect her ability to make money to ply her craft. Now, if they started calling themselves a state, she'd have to redefine evolve her position on where she chooses not to work for political reasons. Edited May 30, 2019 by Koko78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 Georgia Should Tell Disney’s CEO to Go Home if His Actresses Can’t Get Through a Month Without an Abortion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 17 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: I'll answer this. Yes, I'm ok with refugees. Give us your definition of a refugee though. Person fleeing a place where they or their children are in danger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 46 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Person fleeing a place where they or their children are in danger You mean like all the liberals that fled the US after the election? Oh wait...that’s right, none of them actually fled after all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: You mean like all the liberals that fled the US after the election? Oh wait...that’s right, none of them actually fled after all. who wants disease-ridden no-talent mouths who never keep their promises? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 ignoring the ?️ ?️ ?️ 's It’s not the ban that’s shutting them down; it’s the unsafe conditions “...State health officials said the license for Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood in St. Louis was in jeopardy because they were unable to interview seven of its physicians over “potential deficient practices’...” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Person fleeing a place where they or their children are in danger In danger of what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 42 minutes ago, B-Man said: ignoring the ?️ ?️ ?️ 's It’s not the ban that’s shutting them down; it’s the unsafe conditions “...State health officials said the license for Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood in St. Louis was in jeopardy because they were unable to interview seven of its physicians over “potential deficient practices’...” . dealing in death is a horrible filthy thing for a living Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Person fleeing a place where they or their children are in danger So only people accompanied by children can be refugees? Or are they still refugees if they leave their children behind, in danger? This is the worst use of "think of the children" I have ever seen. You're a ***** idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 the reason for asylum is usually serious peril, not economic inconvenience especially when people are in nice jeans and a polo shirt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 29 minutes ago, DC Tom said: So only people accompanied by children can be refugees? Or are they still refugees if they leave their children behind, in danger? This is the worst use of "think of the children" I have ever seen. You're a ***** idiot. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 31, 2019 Share Posted May 31, 2019 https://babylonbee.com/news/moloch-says-he-may-rethink-presence-in-georgia-if-anti-abortion-bill-goes-into-effect 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts