Jump to content

National Anthem Solution


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

What Employer FORCES mandatory participation in the Anthem or Pledge before a meeting?  Go ahead and find me that first

 

The NFL isn’t forcing participation with this new rule

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Employers FORCE mandatory participation in all kinds of non-sense that are way more annoying than the National Anthem. 

 

So None.  NO EMPLOYER forced standing for the National Anthem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh brother!  Can someone why an employer should put up with their employees protesting things, during work hours, that have nothing to do with their place of employment?  Answer....no employer would put up with this.  This is NOT a first amendment issue.  This is an issue of appropriate use of office time.

“Regular” people’s jobs aren’t the same. Like it or not, these guys are looked up to as role models and they have more power than the average person.  Their voices can lead to real changes.

 

i swear there are some people here who would have complained about Jackie Robinson.  They should just in their place right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

And I've seen that larger point mentioned over and over and over in this debate.

 

I don't understand why.  It's irrelevant, you agree.  So why does it continue to conflate the argument?

 

People are allowed to be hypocrites.  In fact, they have the right to be.  

The points are often conflated due to the overlying principle at the crux of the argument; the right to protest or not. Is it really a surprise that people may not appreciate that private companies are allowed to mandate employee behavior? Is that what really angers you about the issue; that people don't have that understanding? 

 

Yes, people are allowed to be hypocrites. It would be hell for so many if that weren't so. As this debate has clearly illustrated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

Exactly.  Fans are not interested in player's political, social, etc opinions, and displaying such opinions during game time is not appropriate.  The NFL paid the price (literally) last season for these protests, hence the 'new' rules.  Actually, it was an old rule that they seemed to think needed re-codified.  Fans want to see games free of politics and maybe the NFL is starting to get this.

Stop saying this is how all fans think. It’s not.  I respect people who try and help those who have less than they do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MAJBobby said:

How did they pay the price again, they made more Revenue than the made in 2016?

 

Loss of good-will, lower attendance, unwanted attention.  They may have made more from TV contracts, won't argue that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason this 'protest' is so divisive is that no one knows what the heck these guys are actually protesting, how the heck they'll know when to end their protest, or why the heck they chose the national anthem as the time to conduct it.  Maybe next time they can get better organized!  (Here's a hint.....The official symbol of your local Police Department, is NOT the national anthem!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

It's a **** perspective, because the NBA has required standing for the anthem for 20+ years.  

 

You LACK perspective.  Period.

The nba is the most progressive sports league in the world and encourages their athletes/ coaches to speak their mind.  The nfl is ass backwards.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

“Regular” people’s jobs aren’t the same. Like it or not, these guys are looked up to as role models and they have more power than the average person.  Their voices can lead to real changes.

 

i swear there are some people here who would have complained about Jackie Robinson.  They should just in their place right?

These guys are actors on a TV show!  They are not role models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Stop saying this is how all fans think. It’s not.  I respect people who try and help those who have less than they do. 

 

I believe the majority of fans do feel this way, not all, but most.  I have no problem with players helping others who have less than they do, but that is not what is being debated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

The reason this 'protest' is so divisive is that no one knows what the heck these guys are actually protesting, how the heck they'll know when to end their protest, or why the heck they chose the national anthem as the time to conduct it.  Maybe next time they can get better organized!  (Here's a hint.....The official symbol of your local Police Department, is NOT the national anthem!)

The reason this "protest" is so divisive is because anything race related gets divisive.  And that is exacerbated by the current sitting president.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

And then what happens with this policy.  They get fined RIGHT?

 

Yes as is the employers right. I would suggest that if they really wanted to go over game film to stay in the locker room and they wouldn’t be fined. I don’t see how that’s unreasonable 

 

Edited by Bray Wyatt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I believe the majority of fans do feel this way, not all, but most.  I have no problem with players helping others who have less than they do, but that is not what is being debated.

Maybe your friend group.  You honestly think most people of color feel this way?  Pretty naive to think that.  

 

And nascar lost a lot of ratings. Probably because of those kneelers they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Yep Cool a Bunch of Billionaires that do less for people than Kaepernick taking some type of moral high ground by blackballing him.  Now that is comical.

They cater to their customers and that is ethical that is what you are supposed to do as a business.  These players have no ethics and don't care what the people paying think or how they feel.  They are what they claim to hate.  A bunch of hypocrits. it's ironic that I made a legitimate point and no one empathises with me.  The funny part is you actually think they care,.

Edited by Hapless Bills Fan
politics -> ppp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Yes as is the employers right. I would suggest that if they really wanted to go over game film to stay in the locker room and they wouldn’t be fine. I don’t see how that’s unreasonable 

 

So again What other Employer FORCES participation in the National Anthem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...