Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:11 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Yet, your brought out the tired old Laughable Love it or Leave it line.  

Expand  

 

I'm genuinely curious, how is allowing players to sit out the anthem completely forcing patriotism on them?  And what does a workplace code of conduct have to do with "taking away freedom?"

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:07 PM, thebandit27 said:

 

Not at all.

 

You have freedom of choice, but not freedom from consequences.  Anyone can receive punishment from their employer for their actions; that's a simple truth of being under someone else's employ.

 

Individual freedom means that nobody can take away your choice to say/do what you want provided that you aren't impinging upon the rights of others.  That's not happening here; players can say/do what they want.  Individual freedom doesn't insulate them from consequences.

Expand  

 

IMO forcing players to stand for the anthem as display of Patriotism that the NFL gets paid for in stadia funded by taxpayer dollars before the games begin is deeply ironic. 

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:16 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

IMO forcing players to stand for the anthem as display of Patriotism that the NFL gets paid for in stadia funded by taxpayer dollars before the games begin is deeply ironic. 

Expand  

 

They're not.  They can stay in the locker room with no consequence.  Try again.

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 5:49 PM, aristocrat said:

the nfl gave the players 90 mil towards activism right?  Money can solve a lot of issues.  I imagine they see that as paying for it to go away. 

Expand  

 

Stick and carrot; the horses can decide which to follow.

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:18 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It's a false choice the way I see it.  

Expand  

 

Then anyone who's employed has false choice.  They're not in any unique situation at all, any more than the rest of Americans.

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 4:40 PM, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Dude, you know that the whole point of the protest is because the point of their argument was that black people incur violence from police disproportionately. You can dispute whether or not this is the case.

 

But come on, how is giving the police more money going to have them kill fewer black people? Why should the onus be on teenagers to not scare the cops by existing to the extent that they don't get riddled with bullets?

 

You can agree or disagree with their premise, but you are being stupid about what you seem to think the problem is.

Expand  

De-escalation training.  Tazers.  More time at the gun range for police.

 

Training the teenagers to STFU and realize they're in a losing situation with a gun drawn on them and it's not the time to argue or try to make world star.  Attacking police, shouting at police, arguing with police or doing anything else but what they ask of you is stupid - you can disagree all you want. But that's not where you make your argument of right or wrong.

 

Thinking I'm stupid is part of YOUR problem. The problem isn't the police. It's morons who don't listen to police and get what they deserve, a Darwin award delivered in a bullet.  

 

I feel this argument supercedes your ability to converse so, I tip the hat to your bonnet and wish you a good day.

  On 5/23/2018 at 4:39 PM, eball said:

I'd like to know how many of the "millions" of fans who gave up the NFL over this issue stand up in front of their televisions at home and salute the anthem before they watch a sporting event.

 

The whole damn thing is ridiculous.  The players who kneel are ridiculous, the people who complain about the kneeling are ridiculous, and the notion of thinking the anthem should be played before sporting events is ridiculous.

Expand  

That's the worst analogy anthem kneelers make. It's a red herring and absolutely nothing to do with the argument. In your profession I know you can construct a better counter to that.

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:19 PM, Luxy312 said:

 

Then anyone who's employed has false choice.  They're not in any unique situation at all, any more than the rest of Americans.

Expand  

 

Why even play the anthem before sporting events?  It doesn't happen in any other professional endeavor. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:16 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

IMO forcing players to stand for the anthem as display of Patriotism that the NFL gets paid for in stadia funded by taxpayer dollars before the games begin is deeply ironic. 

Expand  

 

Is it any more ironic or unfair than any employer that receives any public funding having rules of conduct by which they expect their employees to abide?

Posted

NFL is concerned with optics and how that might negatively impact the millions paid by the military to stage these for profit displays of patriotism. Over my many decades of attending sports events, I’ve seen far more blatant displays of disrespect in the stands during the playing of the anthem than anything a kneeling player shows.

 

The hypocrisy is off the charts. Not surprised in this day and age where symbols mean more than the very right they represent. 

Posted (edited)
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:16 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

IMO forcing players to stand for the anthem as display of Patriotism that the NFL gets paid for in stadia funded by taxpayer dollars before the games begin is deeply ironic. 

Expand  

 

No one is forcing them to do ANYTHING. They can kneel. In the locker room. Owner's prerogative.

 

 

Edited by LABillzFan
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:22 PM, thebandit27 said:

 

Is it any more ironic or unfair than any employer that receives any public funding having rules of conduct by which they expect their employees to abide?

Expand  

 

Are there any other employers that begin their work days by playing the anthem and forcing the employees to stand?

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:21 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Why even play the anthem before sporting events?  It doesn't happen in any other professional endeavor. 

Expand  

 

Another completely different argument and straw man fallacy.

Posted
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:20 PM, Boyst62 said:

De-escalation training.  Tazers.  More time at the gun range for police.

 

Training the teenagers to STFU and realize they're in a losing situation with a gun drawn on them and it's not the time to argue or try to make world star.  Attacking police, shouting at police, arguing with police or doing anything else but what they ask of you is stupid - you can disagree all you want. But that's not where you make your argument of right or wrong.

 

Thinking I'm stupid is part of YOUR problem. The problem isn't the police. It's morons who don't listen to police and get what they deserve, a Darwin award delivered in a bullet.  

 

I feel this argument supercedes your ability to converse so, I tip the hat to your bonnet and wish you a good day.

That's the worst analogy anthem kneelers make. It's a red herring and absolutely nothing to do with the argument. In your profession I know you can construct a better counter to that.

Expand  

Losing situation like the black people who had cops called on them because they were having a BBQ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:24 PM, nucci said:

Losing situation like the black people who had cops called on them because they were having a BBQ?

Expand  

Don't know the details. *yawn.  Don't care. Your whatever reason of whatever reason is more than likely a noise disturbance or something as such. *Yawn

 

You realize I will argue the stupidest finite point until you're exhausted right?  Probably good to just ignore my disagreement.  But if you want to tango, start the music.

 

Edit. By the way. That's a terrible analogy. The police didn't call the police on themselves. The police were called and came.  That's just ridiculous. You can try again but I advise not.

Edited by Boyst62
Posted

It's not "love it or leave it".  It's a condition of employment.  I'm sorry you can't grasp this simple concept.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
  On 5/23/2018 at 6:22 PM, thebandit27 said:

 

Is it any more ironic or unfair than any employer that receives any public funding having rules of conduct by which they expect their employees to abide?

Expand  

 

  On 5/23/2018 at 6:24 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Are there any other employers that begin their work days by playing the anthem and forcing the employees to stand?

 

Expand  

Pivot city bro.  Don't actually analyze what you're saying, dodge and duck and distract.  

 

Almost every public school in America forces their kids to pledge allegiance every morning.

Edited by BringBackOrton
  • Like (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...