Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said: Frames were added and the video was slowed down and sped up. But we’re the ***** morons, got it. False. Prove it. Edited November 9, 2018 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 He touched her. He lied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Hix Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 5 minutes ago, Koko78 said: A video analysis was done, frames were added, Trump lied about it. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/video-of-acosta-incident-posted-by-white-house-press-secretary-contains-extra-frames-2018-11-08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: He touched her. He lied. You know what actually happened is going to be ignored because of some fake story about 'frames' being added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 11 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said: Frames were added and the video was slowed down and sped up. But we’re the ***** morons, got it. The WTC was a controlled demolition, too. It's obvious on the undoctored video. God, you people are such ***** morons. Amateur dipshits thinking they can do photo-analysis on online videos on consumer-grade electronics. You CAN'T. Stop pretending you can. And even if you can...just go back and look at the original. ***** dumbasses. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Buddy Hix said: A video analysis was done, frames were added, Trump lied about it. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/video-of-acosta-incident-posted-by-white-house-press-secretary-contains-extra-frames-2018-11-08 Compression artifacts aren't added frames. You're wrong, and pushing a lie. But that's okay, because if you believe in something enough the truth doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Considering that defending Acosta is defending his disruption of the entire White House press corps, I'd go with ignorant. Really...Acosta has done more to suppress the press than Trump has. Trump just fights with the media. Acosta has actively tried to prevent other members of the press from doing their jobs. It boggles my mind that anyone defends him. People like Acosta are just leftists, but with a mic and camera crew. Much like the tibs/baskins/peace outs of the world, they're more interested in protecting the pack than recognizing how dysfunctional the pack actually is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Buddy Hix said: Ha, it’s checking in, not voyeurism. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. I don’t partake much because I don’t have the time to vet each side like some do. But in this instance, the WH sharing a doctored Infowars video and then the President lying about it, I have been keeping up to date. I don't know anything about that. I hadn't seen the wh confirm what you said, but I'll take you at your word that the video was doctored. Did you need someone elses spin on this to help you decide the merits of the WH decision to suspend access? I did not. I watched doctored videos on many news sites where the dialogue that preceded acosta's boorish and unprofessional behavior was omitted. A guy got taken to school for being a moron. So? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: False. Prove it. The White House released a doctored video. East Germany like How East Germany Influences Modern-Day ... spiegel.de Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said: A video analysis was done, frames were added, Trump lied about it. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/video-of-acosta-incident-posted-by-white-house-press-secretary-contains-extra-frames-2018-11-08 You ***** retard. The article itself says the frame format is different. CSpan uses progressive, where the White House provided a video with interleaved frames. Those aren't "added" frames, they're differences in systems of framing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: You know what actually happened is going to be ignored because of some fake story about 'frames' being added. If only Acosta were a Republican-nominated SC justice. He'd be in prison right now for rape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Hix Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: You're OK with what Jim Acosta did, think it's appropriate to lay your hands on other people as part of the decorum of a White House Press Briefing with The President of the United States; or you're denying that he did that? I'm just trying to figure out which kind of stupid you are, the ignorant kind or the vile kind. I think the situation was unfortunate and all involved handled it poorly. If the WH doesn’t ban JA the story dies. The issue coming out of this that concerns me is the WH disseminating doctored propaganda, and Trump lying about it. But do explain to me how I’m stupid for viewing the situation that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: If only Acosta were a Republican-nominated SC justice. He'd be in prison right now for rape. Gang rape. Did you see the train of reporters waiting their turn at the poor intern? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Hix Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 8 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Considering that defending Acosta is defending his disruption of the entire White House press corps, I'd go with ignorant. Really...Acosta has done more to suppress the press than Trump has. Trump just fights with the media. Acosta has actively tried to prevent other members of the press from doing their jobs. It boggles my mind that anyone defends him. Where did I defend Costa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 Just now, Buddy Hix said: I think the situation was unfortunate and all involved handled it poorly. If the WH doesn’t ban JA the story dies. The issue coming out of this that concerns me is the WH disseminating doctored propaganda, and Trump lying about it. But do explain to me how I’m stupid for viewing the situation that way. There's only one person lying about a doctored video in this thread, and it's you. Are you honest enough to admit that now that it's been explained to you? Or will your programming prevent you from veering off from the narrative they want you to push? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The WTC was a controlled demolition, too. It's obvious on the undoctored video. God, you people are such ***** morons. Amateur dipshits thinking they can do photo-analysis on online videos on consumer-grade electronics. You CAN'T. Stop pretending you can. And even if you can...just go back and look at the original. ***** dumbasses. Wow! You guys are all in. Garbage 4 minutes ago, peace out said: LOL, look at KOO KOO sniffing DC's butt there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 11 minutes ago, peace out said: Alright, I gotta give you props. This is marginally more interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 6 minutes ago, Koko78 said: You know what actually happened is going to be ignored because of some fake story about 'frames' being added. This stuff is insane. I keep thinking they can't get possibly get more insane, then every day I'm proven wrong. Multiple people in my office believe that he never even touched her. That the whole thing was doctored. Not just slowed down, but totally fabricated. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 31 minutes ago, Buddy Hix said: Hahaha, what a great take. After seeing Trump lie today and say the video, that’s still posted on SHS’s twitter feed, isn’t doctored I wanted to see what the Republican echo chamber would say about it. Most of the posts are what I expected, but this one is pure gold. Pure gold, Jerry! And nobody in the echo chamber bats an eye. Rape apologist ☝?☝? Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: This stuff is insane. I keep thinking they can't get possibly get more insane, then every day I'm proven wrong. Multiple people in my office believe that he never even touched her. That the whole thing was doctored. Not just slowed down, but totally fabricated. Lol, that’s crazy talk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts