Taro T Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 11 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: So, pleading guilty to high treason will get them a pass with the public? Their plea deals would have to agree with something equivalent to disappearing from the public too. Even so, they would be toast, the kind that is all crust. A pass w/ the public, very doubtful. A pass w/ their buddies, quite possibly. Which is why something to the effect of the bolded would be necessary. And as I'd stated earlier, not sure if an agreement/ condition such as that would remainin effect after a pardon was granted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'll just add that the day he discovered the word "pettifog" was a sad day for the English language as well. It highly amuses me, since he clearly thinks the definition of "pettifog" is "to obfuscate with details and facts." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: It highly amuses me, since he clearly thinks the definition of "pettifog" is "to obfuscate with details and facts." nonplussed irregardless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 Obama, the worst President in US history. And that is saying something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 3 hours ago, row_33 said: nonplussed irregardless What, you impersonating gator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: What, you impersonating gator? a few people use irregardless in my life, it is a perfect word even if it’s unworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 7 hours ago, row_33 said: nonplussed irregardless Disirregardless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 9 hours ago, row_33 said: a few people use irregardless in my life, it is a perfect word even if it’s unworthy embiggen your vocabulary. its a perfectly cromulent word 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 It dozen make a diffabitterance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 On 1/22/2018 at 8:23 PM, row_33 said: a few people use irregardless in my life, it is a perfect word even if it’s unworthy I one had a chick rightfully verbally ripping me apart for catching me doing something stupid. I was trying to save the possibility of the relationship ... She said irregardless. I lost my **** and asked her to define it. She hasn't spoken to me since. Hung right up on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: I one had a chick rightfully verbally ripping me apart for catching me doing something stupid. I was trying to save the possibility of the relationship ... She said irregardless. I lost my **** and asked her to define it. She hasn't spoken to me since. Hung right up on me. I guess you didn't really use your head there, eh? Now you won't be getting any head from her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Obozo had to make the money somehow so Michael could have his sex change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Wow... this just keeps getting more and more insidious. Seriously, take a seat as you read this one: Everyone knows this guy's face by now. Peter Strzok, recently demoted FBI agent and lightning rod in the multiple investigations into the FBI and DOJ. Turns out, he's related to this guy: General James Cartwright. Does that name ring a bell for anyone? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us/politics/obama-pardons-james-cartwright-general-who-lied-to-fbi-in-leak-case.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=DBE96953199F8B406DA9274BA3FBE990&gwt=pay That's right, General Cartwright was pardoned by 44 on his last day in office. Why did he need to be pardoned? Because Cartwright leaked intel about Stuxnet to the New York Times. Those who forget, Stuxnet was a secret Israeli-US cyber attack on Iran's nuclear program under 43. Now, hold on to your butts, because this is nuts. Cartwright was 44's favorite general. A key member of his NatSec team and head of Strategic Command. His leak to the media wasn't revealed until 2016 and he plead guilty to the FBI for lying to them while they investigated the leak (sound familiar?). In March of 2015 the Washington Post reported that the sensitive leak investigation had "stalled amid concerns that a prosecution in federal court could force the government to confirm information" about the highly classified program. Who was the FBI investigator? Rod Rosenstein! The NYT piece where the leak occurred portrayed the Obama administration as ramping up cyber attacks on Iran: https://www.nytimes.com/subscription/multiproduct/lp8HYGB.html?mktgrfr=gw_mob&campaignId=67LWR&EXIT_URI=https%3A%2F%2Fmobile.nytimes.com%2F2012%2F06%2F01%2Fworld%2Fmiddleeast%2Fobama-ordered-wave-of-cyberattacks-against-iran.html%3Freferer%3D Notice the date - June 1st. This is important because at that point, 44 had already invested significant time negotiating with the Mullahs to get his nuclear deal. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheet/Timeline-of-Nuclear-Diplomacy-With-Iran Remember too, by this point Obama had done a 180 on US policy with Iran in 2009: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/world/middleeast/09iran.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=A254B2100EACAF7BB81CFA7C5B263B1F&gwt=pay AND by 2012, 44's administration had turned a blind eye to Hezbollah forming a drug smuggling network inside the United States. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/24/obama-iran-nuclear-deal-prisoner-release-236966 PLUS from at least 2010, 44 was illegally spying on opponents of the deal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-spy-net-on-israel-snares-congress-1451425210 So... put on your thinking caps and ask yourself this key question: Why would Obama's favorite general and key NatSec adviser leak to the NYT about Stuxnet JUST when 44 is trying to get close to the Mullahs? 44 must have known and approved this leak (he pardoned him later after all). So why do this NOW? ... Have you figured it out? If your blood is boiling then yes, you have. If not, keep reading... Remember, Operation Olympic Games was NOT Obama's operation, it was W's and began in 2006. It has been described as probably 'the most significant covert manipulation of the electromagnetic spectrum since World War II enigma." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Olympic_Games Who did the US work with on this operation? https://www.washingtonpost.com/ Until the general's leak to the NYT, no government had officially been confirmed as responsible for the development and use of Stuxnet. This leak essentially GAVE classified information about Israel and the US to the Mullahs. It was done intentionally to signal the Mullahs, to give them MORE chips in order to get the deal done. This on top of the 100s of billions of dollars and prisoners covered in my earlier Iran deal post. In August of 2012 "Dishonerable Disclosures", a 22 minute documentary is released by the Special Operations OPSEC group. Their accusation? "The Obama administration willfully leaked the existence of STUXNET (a computer worm used against Iran), allowing our enemies to learn more about our secrets and our operations." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishonorable_Disclosures In this case, the stooge was General Cartwright. Obama's favorite general. They were AIDING AND ABETTING a known US enemy while simultaneously placing an ally, Israel, in a tough spot.... All at the same time they were protecting Hezbollah inside the UNITED STATES. That's TREASON, folks. No other way around it. And, ironically enough, Cartwright is related to Strzok - the same FBI agent accused by Trump of treason. I have spilled lots of ink on Clinton's crimes - but when it comes to outright treason - it seems like she's got nothing on Obama. This blew my mind... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 Dump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 30, 2018 Author Share Posted April 30, 2018 On 12/17/2017 at 10:21 PM, B-Man said: POLITICO.................those right-wingers Obama allowed Hezbollah cocaine running into U.S. in quest for Iran nuke deal Amazing Politico investigative report — We knew Obama was willing to sacrifice Israelis for the deal, now we know he was willing to sacrifice Americans too. In 2014, cocaine was second only behind heroin in U.S. drug deaths. A major player in the cocaine traffic into the U.S. was the Iranian-sponsored terrorist group Hezbollah. For year it has been known that Hezbollah has infiltrated criminal gangs in South America and set up its own billion-dollar international criminal enterprise to finance its terror activities. None of this was a secret. U.S. law enforcement came up with an aggressive plan to take down the Hezbollah international network and its key individuals. But it never happened. We now know why. Politico Magazine has an amazing expose on how the Obama White House derailed the plans to take down the Hezbollah network, and to allow Hezbollah to continue drug-running into the U.S., in order to avoid upsetting the Iran nuclear deal. The Politico article is so long, so detailed, and so powerful, it’s impossible for me to give a brief summary, so read the whole thing, The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hoo. The subheadline tells the story: An ambitious U.S. task force targeting Hezbollah’s billion-dollar criminal enterprise ran headlong into the White House’s desire for a nuclear deal with Iran. Original Post Bump . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: Original Post Bump . Just because the new BS distractions are getting older, faster! Have you guys listened to Trump's interview on Fox and Friends??? Exclusive Interview: President Trump on Fox & Friends - YouTube ▶ 30:02 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lu_Hgw60Ns 4 days ago - Uploaded by Fox News President Trump calls into 'Fox & Friends' to discuss Ronny Jackson's withdrawal, Michael Cohen and ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 ... Calls the Iranian news a distraction, while posting an interview from last week as if it's anything but a distraction. Gator, your intellectual limitations are showing again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts