Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Voting. The Blue Wave is coming! 

 

Keep praying that the left can continue to manufacture allegations of decades-old misconduct.

 

Maybe the electoral college will retroactively change its mind too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ha ha ha! This from the guy who said from March to November last year that Hillary had already won the election. Idiot 

 

 

"She was never supposed to lose". 

 

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

As to your other point. I think it would be kind of funny if Mueller found nothing, because really who cares? Trump would still be a cancer on the GOP, a deeply unpopular president who most Americans see as an embarrassment. Right wingers continue to show they are better at complaining than governing the country. 

 

Already hedging your bets. For a year you've been saying "drip drip", and that he's guilty. Now you don't care if anything is found because...

 

Oh, that's right. You're not interested in sticking by the "principles" you pretended to care about for the last year, you don't care about this country, or what happens to it, not really. You only care about your "team". 

 

Buckle up, Buttercup. This is going to go a much different way than you're hedging against. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

"She was never supposed to lose". 

 

 

Already hedging your bets. For a year you've been saying "drip drip", and that he's guilty. Now you don't care if anything is found because...

 

Oh, that's right. You're not interested in sticking by the "principles" you pretended to care about for the last year, you don't care about this country, or what happens to it, not really. You only care about your "team". 

 

Buckle up, Buttercup. This is going to go a much different way than you're hedging against. 

No, you said it was fixed. Anyone that believes anything you have to say is a moron. Just a total jack ass!! Ha ha 

 

And no, the drip is on! I won't make any stupid definitive declarations like you, I'm smarter than that. But if I had to bet, Mueller I would say has his teeth in something. Heck, two guilty pleas already. And there is so much....yawn...time for more. No need to jump to any conclusions yet. Time will tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It could trend that way, certain people will absolutely try to push it in that direction... which is why a lot of this is going to be done under the radar, or those provocateurs are being taken off the board first (see the 12/22 EO, Soros et al). 

 

There are over 9,000 sealed magistrate orders in the US between the end of Oct through Dec of 2016 per PACER. These could be search warrants, indictments, no one really knows until they are unsealed. But the amount of them in that time frame is UNHEARD of. The average for the past 12 years is 1,000 sealed orders a year. There are 9k in less than three months.

 

Something is going on. Lots of people are going to be going down for this, I'm expecting big names on both sides of the aisle but a lot from the past administration. 

what will realistically happen is several of the most prominent players will simply retire or disappear from the spotlight.  hide away from it.

the lower level people will plead out to the big guys.

 

in the end this whole fiasco results in nothing but mud slinging and uncovers nothing big.  it'll be sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

what will realistically happen is several of the most prominent players will simply retire or disappear from the spotlight.  hide away from it.

the lower level people will plead out to the big guys.

 

in the end this whole fiasco results in nothing but mud slinging and uncovers nothing big.  it'll be sad.

 

Thats certainly possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Thats certainly possible. 

it will be something along the lines of it being too important for the country to allow such a story/truth/reality to be uncovered.

 

those that caused it will be removed.

 

those who caused it will allow their minions to stay in power and continue their work.

 

oddly, i found myself watching v for vendetta last night.  hits closer to home every year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report: Papadopoulos, Not Dossier, Sparked Russia Investigation

By Benjamin Hart@realaxelfoley 
30-george-papadopoulos-1.w710.h473.jpg
Not discreet when he drinks. Photo: LinkedIn

A juicy New York Times report published Saturday reveals that George Papadopoulos, the Trump foreign-policy adviser who was indicted in October, inadvertently set off the FBI investigation into Russian electoral interference that has become an existential threat to the president.

It all began, as so many memorable tales do, with a night of “heavy drinking at an upscale London bar.” It was May of 2016, and Papadopoulos was knocking back some Pimm’s cups (we can only imagine) with Australia’s top diplomat in the U.K. when he decided to divulge some very interesting information: Russia was in possession of damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role.

 

The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detailed deconstruction of NYT article here:

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/30/transparent-doj-and-fbi-desperation-new-york-times-attempts-trump-operation-justification/

 

The NYT article just shows the shills they are for the IC. They’re just passing on what the IC is feeding them without either thinking about what’s in it or doing what used to calling investigative reporting. If this is the best the IC can come up with, they getting quite pathetic.

 

- July 15th 2016 Comey opens counterintel investigation into Russian collusion. January 15th 2017 FBI visits Papadopoulos for first time.

The FBI waited for six months to talk to him?

 

If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KevinRome said:

Detailed deconstruction of NYT article here:

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/30/transparent-doj-and-fbi-desperation-new-york-times-attempts-trump-operation-justification/

 

The NYT article just shows the shills they are for the IC. They’re just passing on what the IC is feeding them without either thinking about what’s in it or doing what used to calling investigative reporting. If this is the best the IC can come up with, they getting quite pathetic.

 

- July 15th 2016 Comey opens counterintel investigation into Russian collusion. January 15th 2017 FBI visits Papadopoulos for first time.

The FBI waited for six months to talk to him?

 

If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Australians did not pass along the info until they saw the stolen emails were actually being weaponized, just like Popadopolous said. They put 2and 2 together 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...