Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Doug if you're out there, you're welcome. Keep him away from Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 would be the perfect fit in the Patriots offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 would be the perfect fit in the Patriots offense I'd like to see us use him just like the Cowboys used Beasley last year. Can kr/pr as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 STUD. -He'll go to waste here, and you know it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 STUD. -He'll go to waste here, and you know it... We haven't retained sir can't pass a lot yet. Still time to let Cardale sling it or draft a stud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 We haven't retained sir can't pass a lot yet. Still time to let Cardale sling it or draft a stud. This is the EXACT type of player we draft AROUND... He'll go either one pick before or one pick after ours.... Just watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 he's ranked as the 23rd WR here http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2017/WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 he's ranked as the 23rd WR here http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2017/WR Good. No excuse to miss on him. Most sites have him as 5th rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Doug if you're out there, you're welcome. Keep him away from Brady. Lazy comparison. Great college punt returner but lacks the receiving/ball skills of those listed receivers........mediocre hands and very small catch radius. Seems like he's been playing college football for about a decade now so he's been on the radar of anyone who follow CFB for years......but he's not listed as an early/mid round guy because of the aformentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) Lazy comparison. Great college punt returner but lacks the receiving/ball skills of those listed receivers........mediocre hands and very small catch radius. Seems like he's been playing college football for about a decade now so he's been on the radar of anyone who follow CFB for years......but he's not listed as an early/mid round guy because of the aformentioned. Try again bud. 16 catches for 200 vs Pitt 14 catches for 160 vs FSU 13 catches for 171 vs NCSTATE Sounds like a guy that can't catch to me. Everyone know Edelman and Cole Beasley would be solid ! Same with Chrebet from Hofstra! Stop failing badol. Edited February 25, 2017 by Ryan L Billz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) Lazy comparison. Great college punt returner but lacks the receiving/ball skills of those listed receivers........mediocre hands and very small catch radius. Seems like he's been playing college football for about a decade now so he's been on the radar of anyone who follow CFB for years......but he's not listed as an early/mid round guy because of the aforementioned. How is it Lazy? Wes Welker........ 5'9" 186, Texas Tech: 259 receptions... 3019 yards... 21TD's..... Ryan Switzer.......5'9" 176, University of North Carolina: 249 receptions.... 2907 yards..... 19 TD's Both were prolific ST contributors in college too. Edited February 25, 2017 by #34fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) How is it Lazy? Wes Welker........ 5'9" 186, Texas Tech: 259 receptions... 3019 yards... 21TD's..... Ryan Switzer.......5'9" 176, University of North Carolina: 249 receptions.... 2907 yards..... 19 TD's Both were prolific ST contributors in college too. It's not. He's just taking a lazy swipe at me before using the google. He thinks shady is bad and tyrod is good Let him work. Yeeeeee Edited February 25, 2017 by Ryan L Billz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Obviously depends on FA, but I don't see us taking 2 wideouts when we only have 6 picks. Hoping they go WR earlier than round 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#34fan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 I'd like to see us use him just like the Cowboys used Beasley last year. Can kr/pr as well. Does Orchard Park change it's name to Switzer-land? -Could just happen.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 No thanks to small WR's Would rather take Tampa's view of WR's at this point.....big..physical...large catch radius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 How is it Lazy? Wes Welker........ 5'9" 186, Texas Tech: 259 receptions... 3019 yards... 21TD's..... Ryan Switzer.......5'9" 176, University of North Carolina: 249 receptions.... 2907 yards..... 19 TD's Both were prolific ST contributors in college too. It's lazy because he's not the player that those guys are. Switzer was on tv a lot the past 4 years........he's not dynamic in the pass game.......he burst on the national scene as a return man as a freshman so he's been on the radar THAT LONG.........but he's just not that good of a WR and those guys had tremendous WR skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 No thanks to small WR's Would rather take Tampa's view of WR's at this point.....big..physical...large catch radius John, this is completely the wrong way to think. It's how you end up with James Hardy instead of Desean Jackson. A good analogy I heard is to think of your WRs as a basketball team. You have all different positions- pg, C, SF. Most good teams have a small possession guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWATeam Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 John, this is completely the wrong way to think. It's how you end up with James Hardy instead of Desean Jackson. A good analogy I heard is to think of your WRs as a basketball team. You have all different positions- pg, C, SF. Most good teams have a small possession guy. Yeah, most big guys have a hard time getting in and out of breaks. Even Tampa has that guy in humphries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) John, this is completely the wrong way to think. It's how you end up with James Hardy instead of Desean Jackson. A good analogy I heard is to think of your WRs as a basketball team. You have all different positions- pg, C, SF. Most good teams have a small possession guy. has not really worked that way for us with guys like parrish and goodwin.....i do like coe beasely though Edited February 25, 2017 by John from Hemet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 We haven't retained sir can't pass a lot yet. Still time to let Cardale sling it or draft a stud. Ha! Cardale will be slinging hash in 5 years... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts