Boatdrinks Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I won't dispute that we need more regulation. Possibly taxing them at a higher rate or more border security. It wouldn't be a big thing if he said it like your or I did. My problem is that he's not smart or tactful enough to do that. He makes W. Look like a genuis. He's often unhinged and thin skinned. My problem with Trump is he has no real convictions, outside of his own brand. Hes ridiculous. His speeches are mainly nonsense. Have you ever looked at a transcript? Romney would have won this election handily. Hillary will be president because Republicans went with a mad man this time around. Direct from his twitter: How amazing, the State Health Director who verified copies of Obamas birth certificate died in plane crash today. All others lived The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non competitive. Everyone knows I'm right that Robert Patterson should dump Kristen Stewart. In a couple of years he will thank me, be smart Robert. Are these the words of a stable person that we want to lead the free world? Look they are both unstable. They would each have a slew of the best and brightest most stable individuals guiding them. So Hillary doesn't tweet, big deal. She's just as much about her " brand " as Trump is his. Trump wants to overhaul the tax code, clamp down on immigration , doesn't pander to Muslims that don't fit with the western way of life and supports our law enforcement officers not BLM.She wants to keep giving things away for "free". It's an easy choice for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/donald-trump-racism-quotes/ https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/4r2yxs/a_final_response_to_the_tell_me_why_trump_is/ http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/03/politics/donald-trump-tapper-lead/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 In 1991, a book by John O’Donnell, who had been president of the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, quoted Trump as criticizing a black accountant and saying: “Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault, because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.” O’Donnell wrote that for months afterward, Trump pressed him to fire the black accountant, until the man resigned of his own accord. Trump eventually denied making those comments. But in 1997 in a Playboy interview, he conceded “the stuff O’Donnell wrote about me is probably true.” http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/24/opinion/sunday/is-donald-trump-a-racist.html I'm sure the guy wrote lots of "stuff" which stuff was he referring to when asked that? Anything can be taken out of context. Hillary has been heard calling an African American the N word. Oh well. What can you do ? Neither on e of these candidates is good. One wants higher taxes and to give things away for "free" to people that don't deserve it . One wants to change the tax code from the mess it is. One supports BLM publicly, one doesn't. They've made it really easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm sure the guy wrote lots of "stuff" which stuff was he referring to when asked that? Anything can be taken out of context. Hillary has been heard calling an African American the N word. Oh well. What can you do ? Neither on e of these candidates is good. One wants higher taxes and to give things away for "free" to people that don't deserve it . One wants to change the tax code from the mess it is. One supports BLM publicly, one doesn't. They've made it really easy. Dude. come one. For the last five months all we've heard from Trump supporters is how "everythign is taken out of context." Think for yourself. Or else stop calling everyone else a shill. And just because Hillary does something doesn't mean it was okay for him. That kind of htinking is what landed us in this !@#$ tarded mess in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Dude. come one. For the last five months all we've heard from Trump supporters is how "everythign is taken out of context." Think for yourself. Or else stop calling everyone else a shill. And just because Hillary does something doesn't mean it was okay for him. That kind of htinking is what landed us in this !@#$ tarded mess in the first place. And we've heard honest rhetoric from Hillary's supporters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 And we've heard honest rhetoric from Hillary's supporters? Precisely my point. Yes. We got it. She sucks too. I'm not !@#$ing voting for that war lord, either. But an eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind. Using her to justify Trump's lunacy is the pinnacle of childishness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Dude. come one. For the last five months all we've heard from Trump supporters is how "everythign is taken out of context." Think for yourself. Or else stop calling everyone else a shill. And just because Hillary does something doesn't mean it was okay for him. That kind of htinking is what landed us in this !@#$ tarded mess in the first place. I'm just saying I'd like to know what he was asked about : I'm always skeptical of what is out there regardless of the candidate . That's because everything is spun a certain way. I don't call anyone a shill. I think these are two horrible candidates . Their policy beliefs are so stark that it makes it easy. If one was a great person and one wasn't that might make it hard to go with the lesser. But they are both vermin. I haven't voted for a republican since George HW Bush vs Dukakis. That's how bad I think Hillary is. I though about voting McCain but didn't because he said he wanted to tax health insurance benefit as income. W scared me as far as overturning Roe V Wade but I don't think that will happen now. I'm voting the issues instead of the circus around these two heathens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Look they are both unstable. They would each have a slew of the best and brightest most stable individuals guiding them. So Hillary doesn't tweet, big deal. She's just as much about her " brand " as Trump is his. Trump wants to overhaul the tax code, clamp down on immigration , doesn't pander to Muslims that don't fit with the western way of life and supports our law enforcement officers not BLM.She wants to keep giving things away for "free". It's an easy choice for me. trump hit the nail on the head. 30+ years in the "service" of the public, and all she's go to show for it is a (very likely) tax-favored estate estimated couple hundred mill, a hundred-fifty grand a speech from the wall streeters she's going to rally against, a laundry list of misdeeds toward victims of her husband's lecherous ways, disdain for millions of melting pot Americans that fall into her basket of deporables and irredeemables (and that, to me has an oddly Pol Pot sorta vibe to it when she says it) if for no other reason than they don't like her politics, an inability to understand even the most basic security protocol, a habit of lying about where she was and what happened when she was there and to boot, is apparently as careless and reckless as a $5 hooker at a bill clinton all-night banger. but, yeah, he's no prize either. what a train wreck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Precisely my point. Yes. We got it. She sucks too. I'm not !@#$ing voting for that war lord, either. But an eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind. Using her to justify Trump's lunacy is the pinnacle of childishness. She's just as dangerous. She'd just let us slowly melt away. Don't be so fooled Cat - she's an evil woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 She's just as dangerous. She'd just let us slowly melt away. Don't be so fooled Cat - she's an evil woman. Right. Which is why I'm not voting for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm just saying I'd like to know what he was asked about : I'm always skeptical of what is out there regardless of the candidate . That's because everything is spun a certain way. I don't call anyone a shill. I think these are two horrible candidates . Their policy beliefs are so stark that it makes it easy. If one was a great person and one wasn't that might make it hard to go with the lesser. But they are both vermin. I haven't voted for a republican since George HW Bush vs Dukakis. That's how bad I think Hillary is. I though about voting McCain but didn't because he said he wanted to tax health insurance benefit as income. W scared me as far as overturning Roe V Wade but I don't think that will happen now. I'm voting the issues instead of the circus around these two heathens. I think HRC is a bad candidate for a variety of reasons, but I'm fine with her policy positions on most issues. I also disagree with Trump's policy positions on most issues. Consequently, it's an easy choice for me, too. Our positions differ, which is fine. She'll certainly win, but she'd probably lose if she were facing, say, Kasich. Unfortunately for the GOP, a vile, third-rate Mussolini easily defeated a slew of better and more qualified candidates (like Kasich) in the primary process. The blame for that lies with the GOP primary voters and the party itself. They're reaping the rewards at present. They have a painful reconstruction process ahead of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Right. Which is why I'm not voting for her. I can't throw away a vote to a third party. It's like voting for HC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungmack Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Just read an interesting article on BR, "Donald Trump is Tearing the NFL Apart". It starts of like this.. I didn't know that Rex was a trump supporter or that he spoke at his rally. The article goes on to quote a couple of anonymous Bill's players who said their opinion of their coach changed after learning he was a Trump supporter. I'm not sure of the role that politics play in an NFL locker room, hopefully players/coaches can draw a line between that and football. It'll be interesting to see if anything comes up in the next month. Apparently, so is Incognito. And I guess Tom Brady is as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I haven't found anything Trump has said to be racist. It's called spin. You're kidding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) I can't throw away a vote to a third party. It's like voting for HC And the way I see it, a vote for either the major party yahoos and the joke is on me. I'd love to side with the Green Party, but Jill Stein can't stop embarrassing herself. I also align philosophically very closely with the Libertarians, I just don't think their ideas are relevant to today's economic realities. So, in the end, it only makes sense to cast my vote for the late, great Gene Wilder. And no, I'm not kidding. I live in Chicago, it'd take suspiciously targeted plague for HRC not to get Cook County. I spent the last half decade of my career working in local and state politics--Illinois and Chicago, two microcosms of how completely upside down the entire system is. On principal, I won't abstain from participating. But I refuse to play the game by their rules any longer. So, the Waco Kid it shall be. Edited October 5, 2016 by The Big Cat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Linen Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Right. Which is why I'm not voting for her. Ok - then spend a bit more time going after the ones tilting in her favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungmack Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 ricojes A Mexican American voting for The Donald is like a chicken voting for The Colonel. His overall support among Latinos is 20%. Don't know how many are Mexican American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I think HRC is a bad candidate for a variety of reasons, but I'm fine with her policy positions on most issues. I also disagree with Trump's policy positions on most issues. Consequently, it's an easy choice for me, too. Our positions differ, which is fine. She'll certainly win, but she'd probably lose if she were facing, say, Kasich. Unfortunately for the GOP, a vile, third-rate Mussolini easily defeated a slew of better and more qualified candidates (like Kasich) in the primary process. The blame for that lies with the GOP primary voters and the party itself. They're reaping the rewards at present. They have a painful reconstruction process ahead of them. dave, it's funny you say this. as a conservative, it stuns me to see where we are at with trump. However, I understand the reaction to the same old business as usual for many middle to right leaning people. the republicans take control of the house and senate and nothing really changed. what really amazes me, on the other hand, though, is that Clinton was, is and has been the heir apparent to the democrat party. in spite of her obvious, documented and debated flaws---she wasn't a groundswell candidate--she was The Chosen. to me, that's even more pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Ok - then spend a bit more time going after the ones tilting in her favor. HRC may be deplorable. But DJT is unjustifiable, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. K Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 That's not what he was saying. He was saying he felt the individual was incapable of putting aside some comments that Trump made about illegal immigrants from Mexico ( Not ALL Mexicans) when giving rulings on his cases. He basically was saying the Judge was racist in response to his opinions on immigration that were being spun as racist. Trump wasn't saying the Judge couldn't make decisions properly because of his race , but because he felt the judge was being racist against him. Trump had no basis for saying that Curiel was "being racist against him" other than the fact that Curiel was of Mexican descent. He was assuming that, if the judge ruled against him, it was because of his race. If that's not racist, what is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts