birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) Gatorman has posted under different names such as Duck_dodgers and conner though he denies it. I've been here long enough to know who is using multiple accounts and who isn't. good, how bout enlightening us all? those names are not contemporaneous are they? that's where the intellectual dishonesty comes into play. Edited April 14, 2016 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 good, how bout enlightening us all? Do your own homework Sue. Maybe you could ask your assistant to look into it for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 good, how bout enlightening us all? those names are not contemporaneous are they? that's where the intellectual dishonesty comes into play. No, they're not. He creates a new account every time he gets banned from PPP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Can you guys please migrate the "conservatisms successes" talk over to baskin's new thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 yeah, in my estimation you're in the least suspicious group. but setting up a fictitious good cop, bad cop scheme to gain advantage in an argument is within the scope of possibility for several posters here. Really? Who else do you think I am? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Really? Who else do you think I am? Picnic table !@#$er? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) Do your own homework Sue. Maybe you could ask your assistant to look into it for you? there's no method of verification unless you are one of the culprits... allowing unchecked intellectual dishonesty to continue when aware of it, constitutes intellectual dishonesty on it's own... Edited April 14, 2016 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 yeah, in my estimation you're in the least suspicious group. but setting up a fictitious good cop, bad cop scheme to gain advantage in an argument is within the scope of possibility for several posters here. Yup, I have my suspicions also, but never cared enough to complain I've been looking for the rules of debate here and can't find them. Do you inquisitors have access to rules that define "derailing a thread"? Sounds to me like you clods came up with BS and all passed it around the circle jerk and agreed it was a legitimate charge. I'd love to hear what it is exactly so I can point out all the times the Inquisitors do it. Which I'm sure is quit often Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 If we banned everyone based on maturity and value added to the PPP, we'd have nothing left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 If we banned everyone based on maturity and value added to the PPP, we'd have nothing left. if we banned all multiple posters, there'd likely be little left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 there's no method of verification unless you are one of the culprits... allowing unchecked intellectual dishonesty to continue when aware of it, constitutes intellectual dishonesty on it's own... I'll give you a hint. He owns a squirrel and hates Canadians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 there's no method of verification unless you are one of the culprits... Or unless you're paying attention. I said it before: you can find all gatorman's previous accounts by searching on the misspelling "stimulous." allowing unchecked intellectual dishonesty to continue when aware of it, constitutes intellectual dishonesty on it's own... We're pretty much a self-moderated board. Darin's explicitly said so - he won't police people for just being duplicitous !@#$s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 I've been looking for the rules of debate here and can't find them. Do you inquisitors have access to rules that define "derailing a thread"? Sounds to me like you clods came up with BS and all passed it around the circle jerk and agreed it was a legitimate charge. I'd love to hear what it is exactly so I can point out all the times the Inquisitors do it. Which I'm sure is quit often The only rule I know of is regarding profanity - the normal TBD rules are largely suspended here due to the contentious nature of political discussion in general. Defining "derailing a thread" is pretty obvious - posting something intentionally inflammatory or unrelated to the topic pretty much covers it. A relevant example would be Baskin's attempt to change the subject of banning you to his perceived failures of conservatism, or your own initial response (post # 2) in \GoBillsInDallas/'s "Get Off My Lawn" thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 The only rule I know of is regarding profanity - the normal TBD rules are largely suspended here due to the contentious nature of political discussion in general. Defining "derailing a thread" is pretty obvious - posting something intentionally inflammatory or unrelated to the topic pretty much covers it. A relevant example would be Baskin's attempt to change the subject of banning you to his perceived failures of conservatism, or your own initial response (post # 2) in \GoBillsInDallas/'s "Get Off My Lawn" thread. You mean a thread that absolutely no one had replied in, hence post #2, had cycled off to the second page and was probably going to disappear? That you seriously consider that a problem says more about you people whining than it does about me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Or unless you're paying attention. I said it before: you can find all gatorman's previous accounts by searching on the misspelling "stimulous." We're pretty much a self-moderated board. Darin's explicitly said so - he won't police people for just being duplicitous !@#$s. thewn leave gator alone. people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 You mean a thread that absolutely no one had replied in, hence post #2, had cycled off to the second page and was probably going to disappear? That you seriously consider that a problem says more about you people whining than it does about me. You asked for something defining what constitutes derailing a thread. I provided you two examples. Don't ask for something and then B word about getting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 thewn leave gator alone. people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Glass houses? Are you accusing me of duplicitously using multiple accounts, or of not knowing how to spell "stimulus?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 I've been looking for the rules of debate No kidding and it's pretty obvious you haven't found them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Whose Gatorman? Sounds like a bad comics character... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 You asked for something defining what constitutes derailing a thread. I provided you two examples. Don't ask for something and then B word about getting it. Thank you for proving its a BS issue then. Me posting in a basically dead thread didn't derail anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts