Jump to content

The Mizzou/Yale/PC/Free Speech Topic


FireChan

Recommended Posts

 

OUT ON A LIMB: The 1619 Project is a fraud.

New York Times Magazine editors have quietly removed controversial language from the online version of Hannah-Jones’s 1619 Project, a package of essays that argue chattel slavery defines America’s founding. Hannah-Jones herself also asserts now that the project’s core thesis is not what she and everyone else involved originally said it was.

 

It “does not argue that 1619 is our true founding,” she said on Friday. She declared elsewhere in July that it “doesn’t argue, for obvious reasons, that 1619 is our true founding.”

 

This is a brazen lie. When the 1619 Project debuted both online and in print in August 2019, the online version’s text stated originally [emphasis added]:

 

The 1619 project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding , and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.

 

That same online passage, which was the source of so much controversy among historians on both sides of the aisle, now reads:

 

The 1619 Project is an ongoing initiative from The New York Times Magazine that began in August 2019, the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.

To be fair, this Orwellian “history” project is from the same newspaper that brought you Walter Duranty; airbrushing comes quite easy to the Times.

 

stalin_airbrush_unperson_5-2-16-1.jpg

 
 
 
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: 

 

UW-Madison student newspaper fires conservative columnist after refusing to run his op-ed.

Tripp Grebe, its author, called for better pay, better training, and police union reforms.

 

“If we’re expecting police officers to be better, why would we be taking money away from them? When schools are failing, we don’t ‘Defund Schools,’ we give them more money and implement new plans to ensure their success,” Grebe wrote in his submission.

 

“The city of Milwaukee has been defunding the police department for years. This past year the city cut the department’s budget by 60 officers, and the homicide rate in Milwaukee has more than doubled,” he argued. “… As we continue to stare directly into the eyes of police brutality’s harsh existence, let’s continue to fight for solutions. Let’s increase training and funding for police while extending Act 10 to cover police unions.”

 

After he submitted it, he was told by the Herald’s opinion editor Samiha Bhushan via email in late August that although the piece was “well written” that it was “too much of a hot take,” and that upper management of the paper was worried it may “alienate” incoming freshmen, according to a screenshot of the email.

 

Additionally,” the email continues, “we just posted an editorial board supporting BLM and another article publicly endorsing two candidates who want to defund the police. As a result, your article would cause a lot of backlash that we cannot afford right now.”

 

 

 

Gentlemen, you can’t be controversial here – this is a newspaper!

 
 
 
 
 
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

WHAT DIVIDES US IS CLASS, NOT RACE:

It should be noted that the backlash against immigration is often expressed within racial categories. Workers from Nigeria, Zimbabwe, and other African countries who’ve migrated to South Africa have faced terrible violence from locals who resent their competition in the job market. And in the mid-19th century, it was white Christian Irish immigrants fleeing the Potato Famine who stoked the anger of restive urban workers—as dramatically portrayed in Martin Scorsese’s 2002 masterpiece Gangs of New York. Bad economic times tend to push people into tribes—and race is just one way that such tribes self-organize.

 

A modern-day (and decidedly less violent) version of this intra-racial pattern is represented by London’s so-called Polish Plumbers. Something like a million Poles migrated to Western Europe since their country joined the EU in 2004. A majority settled in the United Kingdom—part of the nearly 17 million “posted workers” in the European Union who live and work in a country other than their own. For the most part, they come from Eastern Europe and seek jobs in the more affluent west.

 

What drives them is what drives Central American migrants who seek entry into the United States. They’re looking for higher incomes, better schools, a brighter future for their families. These are dreams that everyone shares. The difference is that posted workers are legal, while many Central American migrants who cross the border are not. The idea that whole nations—including their low-paid workers—will someday celebrate the ideal of “open borders” is a fantasy, just as Sanders told us five years ago. And given the crushing effect on the poorest members of our society, it is ironic that it is progressives who embrace this fantasy most fervently. In Britain, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who campaigned to yank Great Britain from the EU (and hence its acceptance of posted workers), can thank the Polish Plumbers for giving him the greatest Conservative majority since Margaret Thatcher—as their presence helped him sweep formerly Labour-voting working-class constituencies across northern England.

 

I’m not supposed to say this, but I will: Taking a knee to Black Lives Matter, or hauling down monuments, isn’t going to change any of this. Nor will corporate diversity policies, many of which are trumpeted on social media by the same conglomerates that are hiring low-cost labor in droves. What we need are policies—including trade and immigration policies—that help us carve up the economic pie in a way that sees all workers get their fair share, no matter what their ethnicity.

 

 

 

 

In America, class war is disguised as cultural war, and cultural war is often cloaked in the language of race and civil rights, to coin a phrase.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROGER SIMON: Sorry, America. Reconciliation Is a Long Way Off After the Election.

As you can tell from my headline, normally an optimistic person, I’m pessimistic, at least in the short run. It will be a long time before there will be “bluebirds over the white cliffs of Dover” for the USA—or for the UK for that matter.

 

Neither side is prepared to accept defeat and reconcile, except perhaps Greg Gutfeld and, as I noted, I’m suspicious.

 

A monumental Trump victory, dreamed of by the right, staunching the deep wounds created by the dishonesty of the mainstream media during the Mueller investigation, is unlikely to happen, given the polls.

 

They can’t be THAT wrong, although of course they can and have been erroneous enough to be largely dismissible as propaganda.

 

A sweeping Biden victory will be looked on as fraud, given the (at best) vagaries of mail-in voting and the immense and fervent Trump crowds.

 

What we are likely to have is a close, or relatively close, election determined, we can only hope, in a few days. Maybe, just maybe, we will avoid a massive outbreak of violence. Some is, unfortunately, inevitable.

 

And, yes, a Trump win, especially a narrow one, means more trouble on our streets in the short run.

 

So how then to return to the halcyon days of that democratic republic of people caring about each other described eloquently so long ago by Alexis de Tocqueville?

 

Are there enough people who even care?

 

For those who do, three words of advice: Reform our schools. That’s the most important thing and where you start. And, interestingly, in his recent speeches, Trump seems to know that.

 

 

 

 

How far off is the reconciliation between left and right? This far: ‘Marx says what?’ Kamala Harris promotes communism in new video.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 2/7/2021 at 7:40 AM, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

Perhaps we need to come up with 7 words you can't say on the internet?

 

As someone who remembers when TV was heavily censored and the backlash against it and the subsequent actions to change that, this feels very odd.

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

 

SCOTUS, 8-1: You better believe students can sue colleges over “speech zone” First Amendment violations 

 

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2021/03/08/scotus-8-1-better-believe-students-can-sue-colleges-speech-zone-first-amendment-violations/

 

ED MORRISSEY Mar 08, 2021 1:03 PM

 

 

“Uzuegbunam experienced a completed violation of his constitutional rights when respondents enforced their speech policies against him.”

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

But, now this.

 

“JUSTICE:” Biden Justice Department Sides Against Free Speech Advocates in Big First Amendment Case. 

 

“The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments later this term in a case that pits free speech advocates against public school officials who seek to punish students for certain off-campus social media posts.

Last week, the Biden Justice Department entered the fray with an amicus brief that opposes the free speech side.”

 

 

You will be informed of your opinions, comrade.

 

 

https://reason.com/2021/03/08/biden-justice-department-sides-against-free-speech-advocates-in-big-first-amendment-case/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-supremacy-root-race-related-120244625.html

 

This article should be from the onion- that white supremacists cause black people to attack asians- but this lady actually portrays white supremacists as the original people to take away rights from "others". The ignorance it takes to print this is mind boggling for a person who is educated 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-supremacy-root-race-related-120244625.html

 

This article should be from the onion- that white supremacists cause black people to attack asians- but this lady actually portrays white supremacists as the original people to take away rights from "others". The ignorance it takes to print this is mind boggling for a person who is educated 

The positive news is since all crime apparently stems from white supremacy at least the media will report more evenly now without having to find specific narratives before determining newsworthy-ness.

 

the only missing step is to attribute black on black and black on white crime to white supremacy. But it seems like a pretty clear path now to get there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...