Foxx Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 this is pretty ***** up. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1189332482811990016 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Religion of peace my A$$ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, Gary M said: Religion of peace my A$$ we give the benefit of the doubt over here for our fellow continent dwellers, until they proof to be unworthy of our trust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 47 minutes ago, Foxx said: this is pretty ***** up. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1189332482811990016 Chicks cutting people in pieces happens in Syrian prison camps and San Diego. If you are invited on Skype to either place, don't go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 23 minutes ago, Gary M said: Religion of peace my A$$ That's Salafism, not Islam. It's so not Islam that it's fundamentally apostate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's Salafism, not Islam. It's so not Islam that it's fundamentally apostate. No it was the Mormons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 29 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Chicks cutting people in pieces happens in Syrian prison camps and San Diego. If you are invited on Skype to either place, don't go. going there on an ad hoc invite is a thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, row_33 said: going there on an ad hoc invite is a thing? Redheads gonna redhead. Joes gonna Joe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Redheads gonna redhead. Joes gonna Joe. redheads are being lured to Syria ? and San Diego??? (wasn't Bill Walton enough of a warning?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 28 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's Salafism, not Islam. It's so not Islam that it's fundamentally apostate. 6 of one, half dozen of another, nuke them all. If the darn crusaders could have just kept their sh!t together this wouldn't be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 all religions have an extreme small small remnant that are vile and destructive some of these remnants are worse than the rest combined in this present day and age the media refuses to acknowledge this for their favourite pet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Gary M said: 6 of one, half dozen of another, nuke them all. If the darn crusaders could have just kept their sh!t together this wouldn't be a problem. Salafism is a death cult dedicated to creating the conditions for the return of the Caliphate, according to the prophecies of certain hadiths, the which I forget but I recall are non-canonical. But even if you accept those hadiths as true, they're still prophecies. Salafis treat them as instructions: "if you create these conditions, this will happen." That is not how prophecy works, though it is how prophecy has always been misused by apocalyptic death cults throughout history. Which leads to the very considerable theological problem with Salafism: "Islam" literally translates as "submission," and in the religious context means "submission to the will of God." Treating prophecy as instructions, and trying to create conditions that will actively cause (rather than presage) the restoration of the Caliphate, they are not submitting to the will of God, but rather are attempting to submit the will of God to their own. They are literally un-Islamic, in not submitting to Allah's will. Hence, apostate. The majority of Muslims recognize this. They're no more "Islamic" than the Jim Jones' People's Temple was Christian. Side note: three of the conditions for the restoration of the Caliphate involved violence in certain regions. Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Salafism is a death cult dedicated to creating the conditions for the return of the Caliphate, according to the prophecies of certain hadiths, the which I forget but I recall are non-canonical. But even if you accept those hadiths as true, they're still prophecies. Salafis treat them as instructions: "if you create these conditions, this will happen." That is not how prophecy works, though it is how prophecy has always been misused by apocalyptic death cults throughout history. Which leads to the very considerable theological problem with Salafism: "Islam" literally translates as "submission," and in the religious context means "submission to the will of God." Treating prophecy as instructions, and trying to create conditions that will actively cause (rather than presage) the restoration of the Caliphate, they are not submitting to the will of God, but rather are attempting to submit the will of God to their own. They are literally un-Islamic, in not submitting to Allah's will. Hence, apostate. The majority of Muslims recognize this. They're no more "Islamic" than the Jim Jones' People's Temple was Christian. Side note: three of the conditions for the restoration of the Caliphate involved violence in certain regions. Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. Sounds like Bills fans sunday morning rituals. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 34 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/29/why-america-needs-hate-speech-law/ Why am I not surprised that this is from someone who's spent years working in both media and government? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 how do they not see that a definition of hate speech as "whatever we disagree with" is not the right way to do things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 17 minutes ago, Azalin said: Why am I not surprised that this is from someone who's spent years working in both media and government? It would be conducive to bringing about less and less freedom of speech. As much as we need to stay strong and fight against the erosion of our 2nd Amendment we need to stand tall against further restrictions on free speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: It would be conducive to bringing about less and less freedom of speech. As much as we need to stay strong and fight against the erosion of our 2nd Amendment we need to stand tall against further restrictions on free speech. No disagreement from me. I'm just taken aback by the author's galling honesty in his belief that speech should be regulated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, Azalin said: No disagreement from me. I'm just taken aback by the author's galling honesty in his belief that speech should be regulated. if we just regulate Democrats, we wouldn't need many regulations at all. i kid... kinda? Edited October 31, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 16 hours ago, Azalin said: No disagreement from me. I'm just taken aback by the author's galling honesty in his belief that speech should be regulated. Well, considering that using an "inappropriate pronoun" can be considered a hate crime, they're already regulating speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts