Jump to content

golf fans -- is Tiger Woods done?


truth on hold

Recommended Posts

Amazing how quickly the body falls apart at 40 when you take PEDs in your 20s and 30s.

Bingo. Tiger, Armstrong, Rodriguez. Funny how one stops winning after one gets caught.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I hope so. I am a big fan of his, and I know a lot of his downfall is of his own doing....allegedly, but I want to see him reach the milestones that he could/should have had by now.

 

 

 

Getting it together?

 

@PGATOUR

Tiger Woods birdied his last three to post an opening-round 66. He's 3 back. His round: http://bit.ly/1Nzu3pP

CI7GU-qUsAAYEY_.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Golf needs Tiger. He singlehandedly made it popular.

I personally think he's done. I've said this before but probably not really meant it. Now I think he's just another guy in the field, deep in the field. He no longer has any kind of length advantage, and his marvelous short game has lost its touch. Sure I watched intensely when he was at the height of his powers.... Probably the most impressive performances and dominance over a long period I've ever witness in sports. But I'm finding the sport doesn't need him right now either. A fair weather viewer like me is being drawn back into it by Jordan's spieth performance. Can't wait to see how he does in the British, 3rd leg of grand slam. Hes an interesting and refreshing character in that he's not one of these stupidly long hitters like mcilroy. Johnson, and watson. Yet he's got an intensity and precision that makes him very watchable. Add those other guys into the mix and a few others and it makes for great theatre again. Edited by JTSP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think he's done. I've said this before but probably not really meant it. Now I think he's just another guy in the field, deep in the field. He no longer has any kind of length advantage, and his marvelous short game has lost its touch. Sure I watched intensely when he was at the height of his powers.... Probably the most impressive performances and dominance over a long period I've ever witness in sports. But I'm finding the sport doesn't need him right now either. A fair weather viewer like me is being drawn back into it by Jordan's spieth performance. Can't wait to see how he does in the British, 3rd leg of grand slam. Hes an interesting and refreshing character in that he's not one of these stupidly long hitters like mcilroy. Johnson, and watson. Yet he's got an intensity and precision that makes him very watchable. Add those other guys into the mix and a few others and it makes for great theatre again.

Spieth is a great young golfer who has a complete game, but he's BORING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Golf is in serious decline. tiger was the guy that saved it for a while. Without him, no lay

People really care about it. Jordan Spieth? These guys don't have the mystique that Tiger had when he went pro.

 

Check out this article:

 

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101860445

Ding! Golf is a dying sport with courses closing everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

At next year's Masters Tiger will be 40. It's unlikely he suddenly finds himself and returns to form with all of these 20-somethings out there playing lights out.

 

This tournament was his chance -- none of the big names played. Davis Love III won it for crying out loud!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At next year's Masters Tiger will be 40. It's unlikely he suddenly finds himself and returns to form with all of these 20-somethings out there playing lights out.

 

This tournament was his chance -- none of the big names played. Davis Love III won it for crying out loud!

If you look, there were some pretty good players in the field. Baby steps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look, there were some pretty good players in the field. Baby steps.

 

Meh -- very lukewarm field. No Day, Spieth, McIlroy, Rose, Kuchar, DJ, Bubba, Fowler.

 

Brooks Koepka (#12) was the highest ranked FedExCup player in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Meh -- very lukewarm field. No Day, Spieth, McIlroy, Rose, Kuchar, DJ, Bubba, Fowler.

 

Brooks Koepka (#12) was the highest ranked FedExCup player in the field.

Snedeker, Schwartzel, Haas, Webb Simpson, and Kaymer are all darn good players who were in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snedeker (13), Schwartzel (96), Haas (23), Webb Simpson (40), and Kaymer (139) are all darn good players who were in the field.

 

FedEx rankings above...not exactly a murderer's row. Anyway, as the commercials used to say, "these guys are good." Just not as many of them played last weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Amazing how quickly the body falls apart at age 40 when you take PEDs in your 20s and 30s.

I don't think it was PEDs. He was at the fore front of wanting golfers tested. I think he just over trained. I read on tournament days when be had late afternoon tee times he would lift weights and jog in the morning. Way too much on the body, especially with how hard he used to swing at it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it was PEDs. He was at the fore front of wanting golfers tested. I think he just over trained. I read on tournament days when be had late afternoon tee times he would lift weights and jog in the morning. Way too much on the body, especially with how hard he used to swing at it.

i think it was at least in part PED's. but what a thing of sports beauty in his prime. watched him hit driver- 5 or 6 iron to the par 5, 570 yd , 18th hole at torrey pines http://www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080122/news_1s22buick.html while in his prime. routine tap in birdie. didn't even win the tourney (i think he was top 5) but even on a bad week for him he was amazing. it was almost as if the other players were shocked that they actually beat him and he was just as shocked that he didn't win. he was as dominant in his sport as anyone has ever been. but he's well and truly done.

Edited by birdog1960
Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was as dominant in his sport as anyone has ever been. but he's well and truly done.

 

I agree with the above but with a caveat. He'll still be capable of 'moments' going forward. He will never dominate consistently, however. You know, as well as I, that every 'bad back' feels ok once in a while. If the stars align within the next five years, I think he'd still be capable of winning another major. Jack went six years before winning his last major. Heck, Tom Watson almost won the British at 59 years of age.

 

Right course, a 'reprieve' in terms of his physical issues, a faltering field etc. I realize it would take a lot but I could see it happening. As far as returning to a consistent top 5 player at any point....I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with the above but with a caveat. He'll still be capable of 'moments' going forward. He will never dominate consistently, however. You know, as well as I, that every 'bad back' feels ok once in a while. If the stars align within the next five years, I think he'd still be capable of winning another major. Jack went six years before winning his last major. Heck, Tom Watson almost won the British at 59 years of age.

 

Right course, a 'reprieve' in terms of his physical issues, a faltering field etc. I realize it would take a lot but I could see it happening. As far as returning to a consistent top 5 player at any point....I don't think so.

 

Man, I doubt it. His words were actually shocking. Three back procedures now, and he's only 40 -- not to mention the knee issues. I think he knows it's over and is doing everything he can to come to grips with it -- which means saying things like, "I've had a pretty good run" and "I just want to be able to play with my kids."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...