Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

Watched Ted Nugent's show on RAV. Had Kyle Rittenhouse on on as a guest.  He went over the video of Kyle being attacked with him.

Edited by Wacka
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Watched Ted Nugent's show on RAV. Had Kyle Rittenhouseon on as a guest.  He went over the video of Kyle being attacked with him.

Ted carries much weight with voters.  Especially centrists and independents.  Ted who?  But they know who Rittenhousen is...

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ted-nugent-who-once-dismissed-covid-19-tells-fans-he-n1264648

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2023 at 12:18 PM, Chris farley said:

he did summarize it pretty well and has a way with words.

 

 

 

 

 

Clever sounding sentences dont make a clever person.  Here is IACP's statement from 2018.  Does it read like they are dedicated to protecting the gun rights of dumb patriots or they are clearly for logical gun control. 

 

https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/IACP Firearms Position Paper_2018.pdf

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LeviF said:

> IACP

 

lol, lmao

 

 

Criminal Use of Semi-Automatic Assault Weapons
First passed in 1994, the assault weapons ban required domestic gun manufacturers to stop
production of semi-automatic assault weapons and ammunition magazines holding more than ten
rounds except for military or police use. While the ban was in place, it was remarkably effective in
reducing the number of crimes involving assault weapons. In the period of the ban, (1994-2004) the
proportion of assault weapons traced to crimes fell by a dramatic 66 percent.
Semi-Automatic assault weapons are routinely the weapons of choice for gang members and drug
dealers. They are regularly encountered in drug busts and are all too often used against police officers.
The IACP has been a strong supporter of the assault weapons ban since 1992, and our membership has
approved several reauthorizations of support in the years since. The membership took this action
because we, as law enforcement executives, understand that the criminal use of semiautomatic assault
weapons pose a grave risk to our officers and the communities they are sworn to protect

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

 

 

Criminal Use of Semi-Automatic Assault Weapons
First passed in 1994, the assault weapons ban required domestic gun manufacturers to stop
production of semi-automatic assault weapons and ammunition magazines holding more than ten
rounds except for military or police use. While the ban was in place, it was remarkably effective in
reducing the number of crimes involving assault weapons. In the period of the ban, (1994-2004) the
proportion of assault weapons traced to crimes fell by a dramatic 66 percent.
Semi-Automatic assault weapons are routinely the weapons of choice for gang members and drug
dealers. They are regularly encountered in drug busts and are all too often used against police officers.
The IACP has been a strong supporter of the assault weapons ban since 1992, and our membership has
approved several reauthorizations of support in the years since. The membership took this action
because we, as law enforcement executives, understand that the criminal use of semiautomatic assault
weapons pose a grave risk to our officers and the communities they are sworn to protect

By semi auto you mean semi auto handgun.  One that can be hidden. The  weapon of choice in ***** world.  Proven by the actual statistics 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BillStime said:

Wait. What? Good guy w gun was busy?

 

 


she went to a different school that had visible security guards and instead went here. Every school should have visible cops.  We send endless amounts of money and guns to Ukraine but our schools need it tomorrow. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


she went to a different school that had visible security guards and instead went here. Every school should have visible cops.  We send endless amounts of money and guns to Ukraine but our schools need it tomorrow. 


Or we just get rid of assault rifles and save our kids? 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Red states are doing away with free lunch meals at schools - they’re going to pay for security? 

Make it federal. We send endless amount to support democracy overseas let’s do it here. Shooters are copy cat killers. Do this until they stop trying to do this

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Make it federal. We send endless amount to support democracy overseas let’s do it here. Shooters are copy cat killers. Do this until they stop trying to do this


Biden signed the Keep Kids Fed Act last year, Republicans still voted against the bill and red states sued the Biden administration because the act specifically said you cannot discriminate against LGTBQ students.

 

What a sick bunch of pigs you freaks vote for…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...