Owen Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Let's say OT Matt Kalil falls to the Jacksonville Jaguars at #7..... Just saying Would you give up your first at #10 and your 2nd #41 in this years draft to get Matt Kalil? Trade value is close favoring Jacksonville... Bills get one hellva player making the Bills O-line really solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiebills Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I wouldnt just caz i dont see the Jags, Phins or Panthers taking Kalil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 (edited) No - lower pick, maybe. Also depends on the board available, to a small degree. Edited April 24, 2012 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Tempting....hes a franchise LT on paper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Let's say OT Matt Kalil falls to the Jacksonville Jaguars at #7..... Just saying Would you give up your first at #10 and your 2nd #41 in this years draft to get Matt Kalil? Trade value is close favoring Jacksonville... Bills get one hellva player making the Bills O-line really solid. No... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's in My Blood Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I think yes, but if Kuechly or Floyd are still on the table at that point, then no. Kalil is the better prospect of the three but a LB with elite coverage skills or a WR to stretch the field are both more needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I think yes, but if Kuechly or Floyd are still on the table at that point, then no. Kalil is the better prospect of the three but a LB with elite coverage skills or a WR to stretch the field are both more needed. Someone else AND 41 very well might be better picks. If we're set on taking an LT at 10, I'd rather kalil then reiff and someone else though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Not the 41. Maybe a conditional next year, if they're convinced he's a difference maker.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Yes. 1-Kalil LT for next 12 years 3-Mohamed Sanu WR 4-Tank Carder OLB 4-Justin Bethel CB 5-Orson Charles TE 5-Marquis Maze WR 6-Omar Bolden CB 7-Brett Roy DT 7-Billy Winn DT/DE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 VERY tempting, but would not give up the 41 to move up 3 spots. If it's our 3rd or a 4th and 5th, maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Yes. 1-Kalil LT for next 12 years 3-Mohamed Sanu WR 4-Tank Carder OLB 4-Justin Bethel CB 5-Orson Charles TE 5-Marquis Maze WR 6-Omar Bolden CB 7-Brett Roy DT 7-Billy Winn DT/DE I didn't know we had 12 year promises in the nfl. Who was the last OT to live up to that billing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Let's say OT Matt Kalil falls to the Jacksonville Jaguars at #7..... Just saying Would you give up your first at #10 and your 2nd #41 in this years draft to get Matt Kalil? Trade value is close favoring Jacksonville... Bills get one hellva player making the Bills O-line really solid. No, because if he falls to them, there is a better than even chance he'll make it to 10. I'd rather trade down if our guy is no longer there or if there's a reasonable chance that he or someone of comparable ability will be there at later on. Now, if it's Munoz, Ogden, Pace, et al, then I'm totally on board. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Nope.....thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I'll give the OP credit, at least he didnt have us trading with a Division rival. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's in My Blood Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Someone else AND 41 very well might be better picks. If we're set on taking an LT at 10, I'd rather kalil then reiff and someone else though. Reiff would be a major disappointment. When your picking in the top ten, the guy MUST be a blue chip prospect. Reiff is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Paulson Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 no, we will get a good player at 10 it is really silly season right now as people over think things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiebills Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Reiff would be a major disappointment. When your picking in the top ten, the guy MUST be a blue chip prospect. Reiff is not. Exactly it Must be a BLUE CHIPPER and Kuechly is a BLUE CHIPPER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 (edited) Yes. 1-Kalil LT for next 12 years 3-Mohamed Sanu WR 4-Tank Carder OLB 4-Justin Bethel CB5-Orson Charles TE 5-Marquis Maze WR 6-Omar Bolden CB 7-Brett Roy DT 7-Billy Winn DT/DE Yes. And really the kid from PC is moving up to the fourth round? Edited April 24, 2012 by atlbillsfan1975 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts