Jump to content

Tom Modrak thinks Michael Vick is "35 or 36"


Recommended Posts

I was listening to NFL Radio tonight and Modrak was a guest. Carucci was saying how great Modrak was, etc. At the end of the interview Modrak made a comment something to the effect that he doesn't know what the Eagles plans are regarding a backup QB now that Vick is "35 or 36". I thought maybe Modrak was casting a hypothical regarding the Eagles' 5 year plan. Then Modrak made the same comment again, saying Vick was in his "mid 30s". Are you kidding me? He doesn't know a basic piece of league player information every last place fantasy football team owner knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was listening to NFL Radio tonight and Modrak was a guest. Carucci was saying how great Modrak was, etc. At the end of the interview Modrak made a comment something to the effect that he doesn't know what the Eagles plans are regarding a backup QB now that Vick is "35 or 36". I thought maybe Modrak was casting a hypothical regarding the Eagles' 5 year plan. Then Modrak made the same comment again, saying Vick was in his "mid 30s". Are you kidding me? He doesn't know a basic piece of league player information every last place fantasy football team owner knows?

And if you don't know, now you know........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't seem to know too much about "college scouting" either. Odd. A college scout, not scouting well.

 

I'm glad you figured out the root of the dysfunction for the last decade. I'm not going to say good or bad as none of us have a clue how, say, maybin got picked.

 

I will say we did well in late rounds when it's likely easier to just trust your grades instead of having coaches and owners possibly interfere. Odds our, as fans, we will never know. That whole front office was a mess and I'm glad we made major changes, regardless of who was at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad you figured out the root of the dysfunction for the last decade. I'm not going to say good or bad as none of us have a clue how, say, maybin got picked.

 

I will say we did well in late rounds when it's likely easier to just trust your grades instead of having coaches and owners possibly interfere. Odds our, as fans, we will never know. That whole front office was a mess and I'm glad we made major changes, regardless of who was at fault.

Never said I knew. The only fact I go on was that he was on a putrid front office staff, for a long time, that continuously whiffed in the important rounds of the draft. So any way you look at it, he sucked evaluating talent, OR, he couldn't convince anyone to take anyone that he thought was good. Either way, he was a zero for us.

 

And I'm so sick of hearing how well our staff does late. #1 - When your team sucks, there will be many late rounders who can probably make a less talented roster. #2 - We need someone to not whiff in the early rounds. The playmaker rounds.

 

Every teams finds those late round gems and unsung heroes. We are no better than anyone else. But really, look no further than our current roster to know that anyone on this staff that was here as long as Modrak should have a TON more to show for their body of work than he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same goofballs who were still defending skelator in his last season.

 

Probably. I understand the argument saying Modrak doesn't deserve all the blame - certainly not. But as head college scout he certainly contributed to many blown draft choices over the last decade.

 

Sure, desperate coaches like Jauron probably overruled him, most likely several times. Modrak should have done a better overall job scouting, perhaps some of those overrulings would have been averted with a better, more forceful presentation from the scouting dept.

 

The ultimate blame still lies with RW, but Modrak's departure should still be celebrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably. I understand the argument saying Modrak doesn't deserve all the blame - certainly not. But as head college scout he certainly contributed to many blown draft choices over the last decade.

 

Sure, desperate coaches like Jauron probably overruled him, most likely several times. Modrak should have done a better overall job scouting, perhaps some of those overrulings would have been averted with a better, more forceful presentation from the scouting dept.

 

The ultimate blame still lies with RW, but Modrak's departure should still be celebrated.

 

 

Didn't defend modrak, simply said it was silly to get worked up about a college scout not being able to quote every vet players age.

 

As far as scouting we really have no idea what his role in it all was. I suspect he was an ok scout with very little pull in the room (whether he went hands off or had things taken from him) and we are better off to have cleaned house. If that's sticking up for the guy, I dunno what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, but Mike Vick is a little different than some journeyman offensive lineman. Vick's one of the most visible and high profile players in the NFL, for better or worse. Being completely off on his age says something about Modrak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could get a Modrak vs. Donahoe thing here....in the theme of Alien vs. Predator.

Like I said, for NFL players, the difference between 31 and "35 or 36" is pretty huge. I'd bet that most of us here could name the age of most of the NFL stars within 2-3 years.

 

Now that Modrak's gone, it's become fashionable to blame Nix for our recent drafting "aarors."

 

No need to compare Modrak to Donahoe… no need to go back that far. But if we do, Modrak seemed like a bigger guy so my money is on him over old Whitey.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't defend modrak, simply said it was silly to get worked up about a college scout not being able to quote every vet players age.

 

As far as scouting we really have no idea what his role in it all was. I suspect he was an ok scout with very little pull in the room (whether he went hands off or had things taken from him) and we are better off to have cleaned house. If that's sticking up for the guy, I dunno what to tell you.

 

I look at Modrak's role this way: there has been a history of poor early round drafting for a decade or so. No matter who's making the choice it's being pulled from Modrak's draft rankings/talent evaluation.

 

You could argue that the draft decision maker ignored Modrak's board, but every damn year?

 

You could argue that Modrak disagreed with each poor draft decision in the early rounds but the bust that got picked had to have been top-ranked by Modrak at their position most of the time.

 

Would Ralph consistently spend first/early round money on guys that could be drafted later for less $?

 

Mr. Wilson's inability to judge front-office talent forces him to blindly latch on to people hired from successful organizations, that's why it takes so long to root out their incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modrak didn't mean 35 or 36 in actual years, but in prison adjusted years. 2 years in Fed Pen is like 4 or 5 years on the outside depending on the frequency and severity of sexual assault. Citing age in prison adjusted years is a common practice amongst NFL scouts, and is accepted industry jargon. By all accounts Modrak was right and Vick did age quickly in prison, as evidenced by this anonymous quote from a source deep within the Eagles organization "Mike still doesn't shower with the team. He waits until everyone is out of there to shower, and most of the time he wears his jeans."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at Modrak's role this way: there has been a history of poor early round drafting for a decade or so. No matter who's making the choice it's being pulled from Modrak's draft rankings/talent evaluation.

 

You could argue that the draft decision maker ignored Modrak's board, but every damn year?

 

You could argue that Modrak disagreed with each poor draft decision in the early rounds but the bust that got picked had to have been top-ranked by Modrak at their position most of the time.

 

Would Ralph consistently spend first/early round money on guys that could be drafted later for less $?

 

Mr. Wilson's inability to judge front-office talent forces him to blindly latch on to people hired from successful organizations, that's why it takes so long to root out their incompetence.

 

Roughly agree.

 

But if they came and said "and the DE with best first step?" "well that's maybin but he's far riskier than orakpo" would be a fair assessment... I agree the record is ridiculously long and he's obviously not off the hook either way, but it's never been his final call clearly, so we have no idea how to rate him. He stuck around for a long time and is regarded around the league so odds are he wasn't quite as awful as we pin on him. Doesn't make him good though. Just being objective with what we know vs what we think. It was definitely time turn the page though.

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roughly agree.

 

But if they came and said "and the DE with best first step?" "well that's maybin but he's far riskier than orakpo" would be a fair assessment... I agree the record is ridiculously long and he's obviously not off the hook either way, but it's never been his final call clearly, so we have no idea how to rate him. He stuck around for a long time and is regarded around the league so odds are he wasn't quite as awful as we pin on him. Doesn't make him good though. Just being objective with what we know vs what we think. It was definitely time turn the page though.

 

I agree that situations similar to the hypothetical Maybin scenario came up, but IMO don't think it explains 10 years of high round futility.

Definitely agree it was time to turn the page and would just add that Buddy seemed to regard Modrak highly when he became GM then fired him about a year later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that situations similar to the hypothetical Maybin scenario came up, but IMO don't think it explains 10 years of high round futility.

Definitely agree it was time to turn the page and would just add that Buddy seemed to regard Modrak highly when he became GM then fired him about a year later.

Well, he also had him scout the Midwest and Northeast last year, as was evident from the way the Bills draft unfolded. B-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...