finn

Shoot, you're right. No wonder people are jumping on me.

Should be easy to rebut then. Have at it. But start with Davis' drop rate, move on to his poor route-running, lack of speed, quickness, and separation, and end with his feeble production as a WR2 playing with a future HOF QB opposite a future HOF WR. Or is your case that he sometimes--maybe even often--catches balls that Allen puts right in his hands?

I don't recall this play ever working, and Dorsey loves it, as if it's a surefire winner. What is up with Dorsey? Where are the change-up plays, the--I don't know--end arounds, jet sweeps, direct snaps to the RB, RB screens, counter-treys, naked bootlegs, or misdirection plays of all kinds? I mean, try SOMEthing besides the same ten plays over and over and over, starting and ending with the shotgun draw for no gain.

Diggs is a bigger McKenzie: a choke player on an otherwise good offense. Not a hot take to say the Bills would be better off without him.

They do if they're done right, not in the traditional way. Helps also if the other team doesn't expect it, not the case here.

Onside kick would have been the better call. Defense is done.

Especially since they gave up a fourth to move up to get him.

Put in the waterboy for Elam. Bound to be an improvement.

They can still win.

Meanwhile, Dorsey is plotting new, unheard-of innovations, like RB draws from the shotgun, WR screens, and runs up the middle on first down. Gunning for a head coaching job, he is.

Defense is playing better with four starters out than the offense with no injuries at all.

The Bills have only one true receiver on the team. One.

Davis and Knox, consensus picks for the All-Drops team.

I've been neutral on Dorsey, but by now I have to agree with his critics. He's not innovative, he doesn't adjust, and he's predictable. This with a future HOF QB to work with.

Why use play action when it's so successful? Surprise the Jags with an ineffective scheme, that'll screw them up.

So is the Jags D really playing like the '85 Bears, or are the Bills sleepwalking? I mean, perfect play from them?

Why can't Knox make catches like that?

So let me get this straight. The Jags are a) stuffing the run; b) pressuring Allen; c) taking away the deep pass; and d) stopping short passes for little gain. Adjustments, Ken?

The Jags are well prepared, the Bills are not.

Important drive for the offense. A long drive, even if it ends in a FG, will settle the team. Three and out would be very bad.

More profitable to show 15 commercials and skip the replay.

Allen's turnovers in the Jets game fits the media narrative. His playing lights-out does not. If any other QB, especially Mahomes, had his numbers, virtually every media figure would be putting him in the HOF. He'll have to play at an MVP level for another five games to change that story line, it's that entrenched.

And likely not next year, either. Achilles tears take a long time to heal. He'll be 30 in 2025, so a few years left, but not many. A cruel blow to a good guy and great player. Tough on the Bills, too: a $16.6 million cap hit this year and each of the next two years.

Greed will lead them to drive the NFL into the ground. Just a matter of time. To be fair, greed is what made the league...

You might be right; I never heard that information before. Still, it's strange that in our culture "better" means "winning more" instead of "more talented," even if the talent isn't just potential but stellar production, plain for everyone to see. I realize I'm in a minority, but to me, "better" means "better," not "the one who won the most." For example, I think it's clear that Allen is better than Mahomes, even though KC fans will forever yell about his two SB rings. He's bigger, faster, stronger, and just as accurate and competitive. In short, he's "greater."