MDH

How is it delusional? When has he ever shown to have a solid ground game?

I did a google search for "michael schumacher skiing injury helping kid" and the first thing that popped up... http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/formula-1/michael-schumacher-ski-accident-f1-2981606

Conor doesn't have to duck anybody, he just let's the UFC make favorable matchup after favorable matchup for him. The day he beats anybody with a ground game that, you know, actually has a full camp, I'll take my hat off to the guy. As of now he's just a very good striker with huge holes in his game until he proves otherwise. If Diaz decides to grapple with Connor this new matchup will be interesting. If he decides to try and prove a point by going all Stockton on him by boxing, he'll be in trouble. I'm guessing Diaz won't get out of his own way and will stand. RDA might be the bigger threat but only if he uses his wrestling/BJJ mixed in with his stand up. If he does that Connor won't win. If he stands with him Connor has a chance. We might never know. Too bad, as I was really looking forward to that fight.

From what I remember, he went off piste to help a friend's kid who had fallen.

Slavery existed long before the British Empire. Nonetheless, people today should be okay with anything because their ancestors made mistakes? Why exactly?

Not only did he win a national championship he also, you know, won the NFC title game. Pretty sure there is some pressure in playoff football. Or do you think the only pressure situation in a football game occurs in the Super Bowl? My problem with Cam (other than his poor attitude) is that I feel his window for success is really small. He was fantastic last year but the way he plays - carrying the ball and not sliding many times - combined with his really poor throwing mechanics leads me to believe that the moment his strength starts to fade, either by injury or age, he will be about as inaccurate as a QB can be. Right now he's able to overcome his poor mechanics with pure strength, that isn't what QBs who have a long, successful, career do. Just watch the guy play, I don't think I've seen worse footwork on an NFL QB ever. Unless he really starts working on his fundamentals he won't be a QB who has success into his mid to late 30s.

Not sure how the legal system works with regards to that but, to me, it all comes down to who started the violence. They should be charged. The other guys were just defending themselves. Granted, "defending" has it's limits. A group of guys kicking a guy on the floor goes well beyond "defending."

I'd guess that it has a lot to do with winning. The Pats win with the players that get into trouble, so of course they'd protect/defend them. The Bills can lose just as easily with or without these problem children. If the Bills are going to be losers, at least them them be losers with class. Not saying this is my opinion, just guessing as to why it is how it is.

Who hates him because he's having fun? I don't care for him because he's a poor loser and a poor winner. He whines, sulks and pouts when things aren't going well and he shoves it in his opponent's face when he's doing well. His behavior is what I repeatedly try to tell my 11 year old son is called "poor sportsmanship." Cam never learned that lesson. I'm not a fan of the behavior.

I was wondering how a group of cops, with cop salary, could afford to be in the "V.I.P" room ordering expensive bottles of champaign.

That's because the Panthers team you watched all season had a cupcake schedule and didn't have to play one of the great D's of the past decade.

Pace and Favre are the only two I'd vote in. In that order too.

True, but there is the Flacco factor at work there. You know, the mathematical equation which states hes a bottom rung QB during the regular seasn but a fist ballot HoFer during the playoffs.

There are pretty much two ways to win a championship. A fantastic offense (with just enough D) or a dominant D (with just enough O.) You're not winning being pretty good on both sides of the ball. Given that to have a fantastic offense you pretty much need a HoF type QB the only way to win without that QB is with a dominant D. Until the Bills get that upper echelon QB they need to keep building their team based on D. It's the only chance they have.

I spent almost the entirety of my 20s living in NYC and spent countless nights out until the bars closed at 4am. I have a load of great memories hanging out with friends. Not once was I ever arrested or got into any kind of altercation. So good things do happen after 2am!

No doubt he's an ass and I didn't need this story to confirm it. That's a far cry from saying he assaulted two people without any evidence. As I said before, it wouldn't surprise me the least if the story was later confirmed, I just hate the headline click bait assumption that they sell the story with.

It is interesting how the story is being titled "McCoy assaulted two cops." Why isn't it being titled, "Cops assault McCoy." Thus far we have no way of knowing which version of the story is true (if either) but that doesn't stop them from running with it. Btw, not a McCoy fan at all and it wouldn't surprise me if he did start the fight, just funny how without facts they run with a version of the story.

Phil Simms never criticizes anybody. He agrees with every coaching call, ref penalty and QB decision. You know when he rips into you you've done something egregious.

Wade pretty much Schwartzed the Denver D. He just lets his pass rushers get after the QB and let's his DBs use simple coverages to take out opposing WRs. He let the talent and speed of the D shine without them being hesitant because they are unsure what they're doing. It works wonders when you have all that talent. And as for the Bills' average LB talent, I don't disagree, but nobody was saying Brown was horrible when he was calling the plays - as a rookie - for the Bills D last year. Then, suddenly, he gets an extremely complex D to run and he looks bad. The LBs were consistently late getting to the ball, the D looked confused pre-snap more often than not. I don't think it's coincidence. I'm not ready to throw Brown into the trash heap just yet. I'm not a "Rex has go go!" guy but without some team leaders both at LB and in the secondary who had already run Rex's D it was unlikely to be a smooth transition. It seems pretty obvious now, not sure how we didn't see it before the season. Year 2 can't be any worse (can it?) but the last thing I want is a brand new LB calling the plays who has never run this D before.

It's easy to look like you're enjoying the game, laughing, dancing, etc. when your team loses one game all year. I had no doubt that if things got tough for him again he'd be the same guy we saw earlier in his career.

As long as they are on public property and are taking pictures of what is in plain view it's perfectly fine to photograph whatever you want in all of the states I've ever filmed in (and given that this is my job, I've filmed in many a state.) The tricky part is if you want to film/take a picture of a person and use that pic/video in a production that makes money. There are several work arounds for this (depending on the city/state) as long as they aren't the principle subject. However, I have never heard of any township/borough/state saying you couldn't record a piece of property that was clearly in public view. You might get the local law enforcement stopping by to check permits (if they're needed) and make sure what you're doing is legit, but that's about it. Btw, the above makes you sound kinda crazy.

I wonder what Sully is really asking here? Does he believe that the pigmentation of someone's skin means they can't stand in the pocket and throw a football or is he saying something else between the lines? And to answer Sully's "prove it" statement you just have to say two words: Warren Moon. This debate was ended roughly 3 decades ago Sully...

A more important factor in the loss was at the beginning of that vid. "The Bills have not converted a 3rd down all game." How they were even in a game where they hadn't converted a 3rd down until less than 2 minutes left in the game is a miracle. Look at the clock management of that last drive too. Kelly didn't feed Thomas the ball nearly enough that game but you're going to run the ball with 27 seconds left on the clock and no TOs left? Yeah, not a good idea, particularly when you know your kicker has limited range. Lots of reasons for that loss, the officials looking at that replay was not among the top 20. Who knows what happens on that next play if he doesn't stop it, it's pure speculation. Look at the other plays in that same drive. Kelly has ALL day to throw but can't find anybody and ends up taking off multiple times. To think on that one play he'd finally hit somebody for a big gain is a stretch.

I don't see how Carolina scores 35 unless Denver turns the ball over a few times. The Broncos confused the smartest QB in the league last week with their D. Give them two weeks and I have a feeling they'll be able to slow down Carolina too. I'm not sure it will be enough though as the Panthers have a stout D as well. The game will be within striking distance late for the Broncos because of their D. Whether Manning can pull it out or not...I don't know.

I'm usually a guy who will give a show 3 or so episodes to catch on with me. I made it through one of this and decided I'd seen enough.