Jump to content

Dr. Who

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,048
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. Who

  1. Your counterexample is also loaded and ridiculous, even if rhetorical. Expectations are measured by many factors. One of them is the quality of your team. Do you have a franchise qb, etc.? No one can plausibly expect a team without one to have much of a chance at a Super Bowl. Given the nature of the Bills, I think there ought to be an expectation that the team will do well and advance beyond the division round of the playoffs. I'm not writing off McDermott and Beane. I like them, but they will be judged by post-season success or lack thereof.
  2. It's absolutely perfect just the way it is. Add the throwback blues and it's the best uniform in sports.
  3. Dorsey seemed unable to make use of Hines and Cook who are dangerous receivers out of the backfield. We've added Kincaid who is a red zone threat. Prior to last year, Allen was terrific in the RZ and avoided turnovers. Last year, it was a nightmare. I'm not Einstein, so I can't tell you if that should directly correlate to play calling, but I rather suspect it does.
  4. They absolutely bet on him playing well above his current level of accomplishment. I hope they hit, because he could be a nice piece. If not, folks are going to be angry if the cost expenditure is the reason you can't acquire a Hopkins who presumably is more likely to be enough of his prior self to be an automatic upgrade to the unreliable Davis.
  5. He hasn't been showing up to the OTAs, this is news to you? It will only mean something if he doesn't show up for the upcoming mandatory mini-camp sessions.
  6. Some folks pay extra for that.
  7. I think middle of the pack OL unleashes Josh Allen. He's that good. The bad oline play has been a drag on his capacity to be a force multiplier for the offense. I don't totally disagree with what you say about Kincaid. I would not count on him being a dominant threat this year, though I believe there is a chance it happens. My take is the position is morphing. What Beane calls a flex TE is the kind of hybrid the H-back was a generation ago. I think the learning curve is less and Kincaid can have more of an immediate impact. Harty has been hurt. Maybe he is just injury prone because of his size. If he can stay healthy, he might be a Darren Sproles type. I don't see him as doomed to repeat his past and I suppose neither does Beane because they gave him a contract you give to someone you think can make a difference. Naturally, it's a gamble. Skepticism is not ridiculous. Presuming a bad result seems to me a prejudice without merit. I don't equate optimal with absolutely pushing all the chips in. I don't think that is particularly prudent. In my estimation, Beane pushed a lot of chips in and I think he might be willing to do a bit more. It's definitely not a bare bones fill-the-holes off-season because he's cash strapped by the cap. He may talk like that, but his actions belie the rhetoric. I am not willing to conclude that McD is destined to be a mediocre coach just yet, but he has to do better in the post-season. He might be Marty Schottenheimer or Marvin Lewis.
  8. Dog had puppies under the barn last night so I was up in the early hours of the morning. I rarely respond to Bull, but logged in because I could not sleep and decided to answer because there was so much wrong with the entire oration. I realize it is futile as an effort at persuasion.
  9. I don't recall ever agreeing with one of his takes, though there may be an exception to the rule.
  10. McGovern simply cannot be as bad as Saffold. Casper the Ghost would not be as bad as Saffold. If Edwards is healthy, he's kind of a forgotten addition. He'll help. I'll be surprised if Torrence isn't at least a serviceable guard. That's his floor. Overall, the IOL should be stronger, and better. I'm not sold on the tackles, Dawkins had a poor year and he's somewhat overrated, but it's not an incredible hope that the oline will accomplish middle of the pack status which would make a difference. Having decent guard play will help the tackles. I think you are playing games with the TE position. Knox is better than you credit and Kincaid is a big slot, so it's not quite accurate to treat him as TE2 in the conventional sense. You were down on Cook when he was drafted and you still are. I think he was a good pick and will prove it this year. It would be nice if Dorsey remembers he is a superior receiver out of the backfield. Hines, too. I understand questioning the coaching in the playoffs. It's an issue until they show they can win more consistently. Nonetheless, 13 - 3 under excruciating, unprecedented conditions was a real accomplishment. They won seven straight to close out the year. Folks dismiss it because of the post-season. The accumulation of injuries alone, especially on defense, just torpedoed the team. Laugh at that all you like. When healthy, this D is formidable. The risk you take with older players is they are perhaps more likely to get wore down by the end of the season. If Miller comes back close to his old self (and I don't think that's a huge stretch, I'm going to guess you are a skeptic,) the addition of Floyd gives you two twitchy athletes that can bring the qb down. Poona Ford is a solid 1 tech DT. They're going to be better at DL despite your casual assertion that nothing has changed. Here's my guess: LB is going to end up being better than last year. Edmund's was a physical freak whose athleticism helped the D. His lack of instincts hurt it. I bet Dorian Williams is starting by mid-season or earlier. Bernard may turn out not to be a bust. The coaching staff is not as worried as the fans about LB and I trust them to know D. McD is going to call a more aggressive game, even if Frazier was running his system. No one can plan against injury, but if they experience relative good health, the D could be a lot better. A healthy Hyde, Poyer, Tre White coming back more confident and closer to his old self, Benford and Elam, that is not a bad secondary. Nothing about it says mediocre team destined to wilt in big games. I'd like to add Hopkins. I don't think Davis is an adequate WR2, but as is, there is enough talent for the offense to be improved. I have more questions about Dorsey than I do about the offense. And Josh Allen needs to use the short and intermediate routes more. Long ball priority is a welcome change from the old days when third and long was an automatic punt, but the reason Knox's numbers don't stand out to you is both too often he was required to stay in and help the porous oline and when that didn't happen, Josh looked elsewhere while TE1 is wide open. And that summary rejection of Harty you make, let's just use that to include all the new additions on the back end of the WR room. The proper response is not to treat that as deficient and null until proven otherwise, but as a genuine potential to be determined. You don't know and can't know, so no one is compelled to logically follow your assertion that it's more of the same or that Beane is unintentionally fielding a less than optimum team. Given the constraints of the cap while paying up a franchise qb, it appears to me on the contrary that Beane has perhaps had his best off-season. So there, I match your rant with a rant from the other point of view.
  11. I like this year's additions. I was elated with the Kincaid pick. I think he has the potential to be a game-changing weapon, but I wouldn't count on that level as a rookie. We've improved the bottom end of the WR room. Maybe someone breaks out. Diggs needs a complementary threat. Hopkins would be that for a year. Still think Beane is playing poker and he will get him at the right price if he can.
  12. From now on I am going to think of you as Broccoli. I'm told it is supposed to be good for you.
  13. Well, it's good to know you are here for the general optimization of the board.
  14. I don't know if he will work out. I do know there was apparently competition for him, so GMs around the league thought differently. Your pessimism is tiresome, but at least you spelled the fella's name correctly.
  15. I'm assuming the latter. We should be under the cap, so we have 3 to 5M which seems somewhat imprecise. The implied context is if there is an expensive FA out there, we'd have to make further moves unless they want to lower their asking price. Or maybe it's just badly written. People don't read and can't write anything much over fifty words nowadays.
  16. Good for him. He's a real fella and not a stuffed shirt.
  17. To be fair, Airseven is consistent as well.
  18. I think Ed Oliver is better than very average, though he'll have to improve to merit the contract. I doubt this move is directly tied to finding cap space to sign Hopkins, but I don't think the fan base would blame Beane if he takes a shot and it fails. Also, I suspect Beane and McDermott need to see much better post-season success in the next year or two or they may well be out regardless, so too much caution could backfire as well.
  19. The second one was more thorough. I'm under the impression Hopkins recently added an agent. If they are realistic about his options, it's possible the Bills could be a player at a more reasonable price point. Not sure Hopkins is there yet, but as you say, we'll have to wait and see what happens. I don't deny he is a risk, btw, but the way I see it, he gives you an outside receiver for the short and intermediate routes that still has great hands. Davis can still run the go routes as a third option. If the oline is significantly improved that will make the largest difference regardless of who is playing WR2.
  20. Okay, I'll give them a look, but if Peter Pan shows up I'm putting you on ignore.
  21. This is like fan fiction for my pal @Warriorspikes51. I doubt any cap savings by extending Oliver is sufficient to match Hopkins' contract wishes which I surmise are currently inflated above where the league values him.
  22. But it's not really an extravagant contract for the position and shortly it will be even more modest in terms of where it ranks league wide.
  23. Some fellas focus on the balcony, some on gams. These fellas are Dline enthusiasts.
  24. I don't fully accept your analysis, but perhaps I should have bolded the part where I said I don't expect Beane to sign him.
×
×
  • Create New...