SectionC3

So what I draw from this is that you believe the fake elector scheme to be consistent with the constitution and ergo perfectly legal. Sick.

I’m still waiting for you to articulate the constitutional issue raised by the levying of the most recent set of charges. It’s starting to to like your claim of a constitutional issue is a hoax.

By a popular vote, if I recall correctly. And legally. By contrast . . .

Sure. But not for long. I think he finished the “Duke Williams” game against the Titans at RT. But that’s probably as far as it goes there. It wouldn’t be as bad as the short-lived “let’s see if Andy Levitre is a tackle” experiment of pre-seasons gone by.

This is so stupid, but we should expect nothing less from you. Live and let live, man.

I’ll borrow from Winston Churchill. At the end of today, I’ll be sober and you’ll still be a MAGA slob.

And yet, years later, there is no evidence of any irregularities. Exactly as much as he did with respect to Obamacare. Which is to say nothing.

There's a principle in the law that criminals don't announce their intent. Perhaps it applies here. Hoax. The Europeans don't mock us because of Democratic views or policies. They mock us because of MAGA.

Hoax. Also, the fact that you are a moderator after what you wrote yesterday is disgusting. More to the point, what you wrote yesterday is disgusting. Hoping for the death of a political rival is beyond the pale. I get that this is a message board, but there's truth to those statements and if you say nonsense like that here there's a good chance you'll say it elsewhere, and that others will repeat it.

Hoax. Also, aren't you the twisted guy who pretends to be conservative but who actually wants a command economy? Just another guy who makes up a term ("deep state") that nobody can actually define. Tomorrow it will be "woke," whatever that means. Then maybe he'll move on to another boogeyman. (Trans, Mexicans, perhaps RINOs or globalists.) And, last I checked, "We the People" voted in somebody else as President. Hoax. Prove it. (FYI - you can't.)

They look inept for plenty of other reasons. I believe it was that whiny loser Irv. I was equally taken aback by that post.

Miami. Playoff game.

That’s not what I think at all. Maybe if it was such a great trade school experience people like you should sign up for it today. There are some things in life with respect to which there can be no equivocation. Slavery is one of them. There was nothing good about slavery. Attempting to mollify it, or soften it, only takes time away from what should be taught about it: it was wrong then, it’s wrong now, it was racist, and its true horrors probably can never be adequately understood generations later.

Hoax. I’m not lying. You’re dodging the point. Why not sign up to be a slave? You seem to think it had some benefits. So go for it. Hoax. You’re the commie who wants the government to step in to curb inflation.

Hoax.

Low price. Poor health, low intelligence, bad attitudes. And they wonder why things haven’t gone their way in life.

Notice that nobody from our MAGA crew responded to this. If there was a benefit to slavery and good that came from it, then why not sign up to be a slave yourself and see how it goes?

Minkah Fitzpatrick disagrees.

I honestly have no idea what you were talking about.

He'll come back with a cartoon, or some gibberish about fake news, or some conspiracy theory in which aliens eating peanut butter were allowed into the state department by Hillary while she was confessing to the murder of Vince Foster. But none of that will happen until he gets done arguing that Jesus was not a brown migrant, and in fact took a white-skinned, blue-eyed, perhaps blond-haired form and supported the prosperity Gospel.

Hoax. I didn't mention obesity, drunkenness, or racism. Although, now that you mention it, I probably should have reminded everyone that many MAGA are slobs soused in liquor. Thank you for the reminder! Also, you didn't mention anything about "Lock Her Up!" Your concern with respect to the rabidity relative to which one partisan group seems intent upon incarcerating a member or members of a partisan group with opposing views seems misplaced. Unless, of course, you believe that Hillary Clinton should have been incarcerated without due process.

I’m surprised you get TV in the basement.

Hoax. Also, if it’s such a good experience, maybe you should try being a slave. You might learn a skill or a trade. At the very least you’d be so busy that you’d break your cartoon-viewing habit.

Why so scared of the marketplace of ideas and a popular vote? Hoax. "Lock her up!" Also, Trump is going to get due process, there's a good chance he will be convicted of something, and then, as it did on January 6th, MAGA will have to choose between rule of law and respect for law enforcement, or the other option, which involves a little bit of stupidity, some denialism, a handful of cultism, diabetes (just because), and rejection of law enforcement and the rule of law. Looks like you're headed toward option #2.

The court could also, like, regulate itself by applying more stringent ethics standards. But it won’t. Which is a shame.