SectionC3

There’s a couple of weeks left, but Shorter looks to me like a candidate for a redshirt.

The way you phrased your question unwittingly undercuts your point. Everyone is going to decide that issue. The legal determination, of course, will be made in a court or courts of law. But voters will also have input through at least the early primary process in 2024. And the court of public opinion is free to draw whatever conclusion is pleases.

He signed off on it. And, he blew the Senate for Republicans by supporting the more than tripling the individual COVID relief checks. Blame doesn’t lie solely with Trump for whatever grievance might have with COVID spending. But the fact remains that this guy is responsible for cutting the top tax rate while at the same time spending like a drunken sailor. If that’s your definition of fiscal conservatism, then you must be MAGA.

You forgot about the allegedly illegal avenues that were explored.

Aren’t you the guy who trembled at the mention of the Antifa Air Force? In the land of the blind …

Winner winner chicken dinner.

Fooled by a pig farmer. The joke is on them. Hoax.

I completely agree on Saleh. That speech sounded fake. And what a poor speaker that man is. I expected to be impressed by his leadership skills. Completely opposite result. He sounds like a phony.

Take it to a court of law and prove it.

Don’t confuse the result with the effort. Our collective standards for what passes for acceptable behavior for our leaders had fallen off of a cliff since 2016. Not my standard, mind you. Bit apparently yours has so declined.

Maybe. But I suspect you know why they folded against the Bengals last year. Weird, crazy stuff. I like to think they’re tougher and better than that.

It was one of the first indications of his desire to violate norms. He couldn’t incarcerate her. We know that. But did he? And would he have tried? And is his lack of effort indicative of anything other than incompetence? (How are the wall and repeal and replace going?) His behavior over the next four years suggests that he would have tried to incarcerate her if laziness/opportunity didn’t intervene. And, word salad/hyperbole isn’t an excuse for what he encouraged. There’s a big difference between a campaign slogan (for example, change we can believe in, morning in America, or even make America great again) and a repeated call to incarcerate a political opponent.

Our resident constitutional “expert” chimes in again. FYI - one of the things you didn’t think through in your prior garbage analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment is that a challenge to Trump’s eligibility for elected office based on that text has a decent chance of reaching SCOTUS. And, once it gets to SCOTUS, there’s a certain Chief Justice who would have a very tasty opportunity to bury Trump, unite his political party, and put this BS to rest once and for all. So all these Trumper dopes who think they know a thing or two about the Constitution not only should try to read it (to the extent that’s possible given the high rates of illiteracy in MAGA) and play the long game. That, ladies and gentlemen, is the path to cooking the Trump goose once and for all for establishment Republicans who don’t have to answer to the base. Hoax. It was a call to jail a political opponent without due process with which the intended beneficiary (Trump) agreed.

Hoax. You got nothing. Probably 150 words about how you have nothing in which you attempt to flip the burden of proof but refuse to articulate so much as one example supportive of your supposition. Well done! Hoax. He took a break from looking at cartoons, mumbling “lock her up,” and declaring all of the allegations against Trump witch hunts to type that. Disney says hello.

Lock her up!

Maybe if you weren’t so into conspiracy theories and laptops and spent more time reading the constitution you’d be able to tell us all where it says that a conviction is a predicate to application of the 14th Amendment bar to holding public office. Still ducking that one, aren’t you, hoax man?

I stopped at false and defamatory. There’s the hoax.

Speaking of being full of yourself, how are things coming with your constitutional research?

They’re gonna cut them both to save a roster spot and maybe bring one back to the 53 or maybe see what else is out there.

He is the free seafood u guy, and he has that little black mark from his time with Ron Darby, so maybe it’s not exactly his choice to be where he is.

Hoax. You forgot the “Joe and Kamala aren’t his nonsense” argument and votes.

Depends on how his hands are taped, right? Totally agree - they could have made a quick switch. Torrence starting at RG speaks for itself.

That chuck to Murray was a thing of beauty, as was the double clutch screen he threw outside of Shavers’s frame for a touchdown. Look, Kyle has an NFL arm and he’s mobile. But if you were pleased with what you saw yesterday — especially after Barkley operated the 3s with barely a hiccup, then I don’t know what to say.

Read between the lines: I would be stunned if anyone in the organization wants the latter anywhere near Buffalo during football season. And not because she's a good distraction.

Hoax. You keep on ducking the point. A simple question and a simple answer, in your words. Where in the plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment is this conviction predicate of which you speak? Once you acknowledge that you don't know what you're talking about and that you haven't actually, you know, read that amendment, then we can get into specifics about why you're wrong and and about the depth of your cluelessness.