Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. Who are her "handlers?" Face it. You dislike her simply because you disagree with her politics. But the fact remains that she stepped into the arena and accomplished something with her life. You, on the other hand, cling to Internet bullying, thinly-veiled racism, homophobic remarks, and general hate as a way of making yourself feel good. Sad!
  2. I can’t think of anyone on this website who knows less about women than you. Hoax. Says the eighth grade superstar. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she did something with her life. You, by contrast, cling to your “success” in the eighth grade. sad! She’s in Congress, you’re an incel. I think she has you on this one.
  3. looks like it was a best of the worst award. also, a lot of people are saying that you peaked too early. It was all downhill after your best of the worst award in eighth grade. Today you’re a washed loser who tries to put others down to make himself feel better. That’s too bad.
  4. Honors? Wow. Impressive. What kind of honors? Was it a “best of the worst” type of thing? Or were you so amazing that they renamed the school after you once you left?
  5. Did you graduate eighth grade? Base on what you write here a lot of people have doubts about that.
  6. Every other day would be better. But it’s a reasonable idea to split the student body in half. Depends on the physical size of the school, I suppose.
  7. Hoax. That’s the nutshell version of wha he’s on the the washed up psycho and hoax lists. Edit: of a virus from which .... carry on. I bet you’re on the short list of a lot of people. Sad!
  8. Who is an “outta control middle schooler[],” old timer?
  9. Hoax. Except for the part about being a lawyer. That's true. Look who's back!
  10. Hoax. Obama didn’t pardon his pals. That’s a trump thing. care to educate me on Obama’s disregard for the constitution?
  11. I live in Buffalo. I saw the stone commutation. The manafort jury tampering. The Flynn comments. The border wall seizure. The absolute authority comment. The emoluments clause violations. And that’s just off the top of my head. Nah. They’re too busy running up deficits and trampling the constitution to do that. About the same as fascism. So hopefully trump is on the way out.
  12. Are you talking to the trump hoaxers? I think they did plan on keeping things going after the virus saw the stars and bars and magically disappeared. vrius, 1. Equality, 1. Trump hoaxers, 0. I agree that Trumpers do not believe in the rule of law. Well said.
  13. Hoax. I have the Sufferin’ Sucatash mudflaps.
  14. Unless the arrest is illegal! Common Sense, 1. Third n Whatever, 0. Typically legally.
  15. Neither is the fact that people shouldn’t be yanked off of the street without due process.
  16. Gotta love those bunker boys. I heard Trump moved pretty fast to the bunker to get away from those snowflakes.
  17. Speaking of hoaxes, I’m beginning to question your status as an intellectual standard bearer. If the best you have is, “He stood up at one point in January, and therefore it’s everyone else’s fault that he called it a hoax, tried to wish it away, did nothing to coordinate a national response, didn’t invoke the DPA to get PPE for struggling front-line workers, mocked those who wore masks, wasted time with hydroxychloroquine, TV ratings, and direct-to-lung Lysol treatments, and encouraged states to reopen before it was safe!,” then I guess we just agree to disagree. I demand better from my leadership. You apparently have much lower standards.
  18. I think season tickets bite the dust today, too. FYI. It’s too bad.
  19. Either way we have to compete there. Make trump play defense and waste money there.
  20. Kind of like those freedoms in Portland, right?
  21. By your definition nobody, outside of a handful of highly immuno-suppressed people in a country of approximately 330 million, lives in a bubble. And to apply the "literal" definition of a bubble, as you apparently prefer, is absurd. Applying that logic, and by your definition, nobody would merit testing anywhere because they all (save for those handful of highly immuno-suppressed) choose not to live in a literal bubble. And, once again, you're still dead wrong on testing. The points that you either can't grasp or stubbornly refuse to grasp are that players are not responsible for policing fellow employees and, even if such self-policing was required in the absence of employer protection, it's not possible for one team to "self-police" another, distant team with which it will have no interaction save for perhaps engaging in a contact sport on one or two days this fall. The ideas that the Bills should self-police the 49ers before sharing sweat, blood, air, physical contact, and equipment (assuming the ball counts as equipment), and that such self-policing excuses ownership and management from taking the most stringent safety measures possible (namely, and obviously, daily COVID testing), are patently absurd. Finally, the "two-week" agreement is a couple of things. It's a stark illustration of the fact that you're wrong here. And it's also essentially a pause in the negotiations. At the conclusion of that two-week period the testing question will be revisited. Frankly I think the infection threshold that labor and management are talking about (5%) with respect to the continuation of testing is way too high considering that we don't know whether long-term effects of non-fatal COVID infection could end or inhibit a career (eg, through lung scarring or simply through lost opportunity in the 2020 season - check out the piece on Emily Regan in last Sunday's Buffalo News for insight on that issue). We shall see if that figure holds and what the PA does on daily testing moving forward. We also shall see if testing abates a bit during camp and ramps up again during the season when travel picks up.
  22. You’re welcome. Your premise, ie, since no NFL a player literally lives in a bubble (an absurdity, to be sure, since bubbling is accomplished virtually, and in any event still unsupported by those pesky things called fact), NFL players do not need or deserved daily COVID testing, remains horribly flawed. Even the owners, who pay for this, acknowledge as much. And on what planet does a doctor think it’s a good idea to allow guys from different cities who cannot live isolation during the season (in which they must travel and overnight to games) to breathe, sweat, share a ball, and touch each other without daily testing? It’s just nuts. It’s a stupid business practice, it’s a stupid medical practice, and it’s a stupid labor practice.
  23. Would you have preferred a literal bubble? Seems like it would have been a good talking point. Doc says we shouldn’t do daily testing because no NFL player literally lives in a bubble! Makes perfect sense.
×
×
  • Create New...