SectionC3

So Anti-Fa is actually Pro-An, and there is no Fa? I get so confused with all of your hoaxy conspiracy theories. Could you please clear this up for me?

Trump will be cowering in the bunker so he won’t see any of it!

Non-COVID risk is known and assumed. COVID risk is unknown, as are the long-term effects (e.g., lung scarring) effects. The NFL issue is a non-starter for me. It’s not the responsibility of the college to protect the kids from the future employer. A small fraction of NCAA players end up in NFL camps, and their interests should not override safety concerns and protections for the far larger group of NCAAF football participants who will not participate in post-collegiate professional sports.

Interesting how this “terrorist organization” bubbled for years and only reared its head as Trump needed a new foil to win re-election. Assuming anti-fa is not a hoax, I guess the only thing left to do is question why Trump didn’t get it nipped in the bud earlier. Also, I realize there is a lot of concern about this anti-fa thing. Do you also worry about the fa? I mean, without the fa we wouldn’t have the anti-fa. So it seems like the fa should be a problem for you as well. Please advise. Also, if you have any tips on spotting threats like communist anarchists, anti-fa agitators, or even the fa, please let me know.

I'm gonna have to Rule #2 your Rule #3.5.

Antifa is a hoaxx.

I thought conservatives don’t tell people what to do? Looks like you’re a fake conservative. I have no choice but to put you on the Fake Conservative list. Congratulations. I guess.

Rule #2, please.

Hoax. Is that a windy way of saying that you cannot satisfy Rule #2 and were caught in another one your hoaxes? Please advise.

I’m coming around on that conversation. The pandemic has opened my eyes to a lot of things that I might have dismissed a year ago. Even UBI, which I previously thought to be ridiculous, is a conversation that I would have. W/r/t Jeremy and his ilk, normally I wouldn’t begrudge a business owner who terminated health benefits upon termination of an employee. But these people—billionaires, (and there is nothing wrong with that)—could find a way to take care of their former employees during a freaking pandemic if they felt like it. I’ll think about that the next time I consider an overpriced hot pretzel at whatever it is we call the Ralph these days.

Accidentally was well put in quotes. Loser tried to have it both ways. Stick with Trump and still defend the Post Office. He used to be a decent guy. But he sold out. Another one who threw his career away for Trump.

Good point. If there’s nothing to fear from these fools, then why is Trump so worried about them? Maybe it could be that Antifa is just another Trump hoax designed to gin up the morons in his base!

I’ll assume that’s a yes (I’ll equate the damage to lung tissue therein with lung scarring). So, question #2, does the flu cause lung scarring at a rate or incident equivalent to COVID-19?

Can the flu cause lung scarring?

Figures about psychology. I don’t know the first thing about it.

Hoax. I’m a person of substance. Tremendous substance, as a matter of fact. And I very much enjoy this occasional repartee with my Trumpkin foils here. So do what you have to do, and I’ll miss your responses. But not as much as you will miss me!

Rule #2, please. Also, from now on, I’ll kindly ask that you correctly count the jellybeans in the jar on my desk before you’re allowed to post anything of substance here. I’m not surprised. This is precisely why this guy is at the top of the Hoax and Fake News lists.

Hoax. I spoke to “afford.” Circular.

Rule #2 evidence, please.

Exciting news. Was it delayed?

Hoax. To tremble and quake in fear also is to worry.

Hoax. https://www.newsweek.com/how-talk-covid-deniers-1525496 Additional Rule #2 evidence:

Hoax. I can’t even understand that gibberish.

SEC isn’t in the thread. And, for what it’s worth, the SEC is even worse than the Big 10 in this respect. Bottom line: I place the health of children over money and my own entertainment. You don’t. It was as of 24 hours ago. When this was allegedly about the kids. Now, I agree with you - spring football is not a good plan unless the fall schedule 2021 schedule is reduced or modified. Asking kids to play up to 23 games in a calendar year is a bad, bad idea. And I suppose asking them to play up to 18 (8 game RS schedule in each of spring/fall; 2 possible conference championship games) isn’t a good plan either. So the best plan probably would have been to have cancelled the 2020 season altogether. But, as we know, money drives the NCAA and now, apparently, the Big 10, so we’re just going to roll the dice and see what happens.

See Washington State re: your last point. Is the daily antigen testing foolproof? To my understanding, it’s not. So why not wait until Spring? If this truly is about “student athletes,” then there should be no harm in waiting until Spring to give science the opportunity to get a better handle on the pandemic. But, as we know, this really is about the conference’s TV and bowl contracts, so we’ll unnecessarily rush the kids back in and see what happens.