SectionC3

I take it you don’t have any hot new conspiracy theories. Must not be much to talk about today.

Agreed. Stop posting your drivel so we can have some intelligent discourse around here about things like the hottest new conspiracy theory, how dumb the liberals are, and the best Trump Hoax. I demand better quality in these conversations. And it starts with you, sir.

Thank you for confirming that you have not threatened me.

Surely as the intellectual leader of this community you know that the proper construction of your point is “read neither the GAO report nor its recommendations.”

What is the main point? And what is “coming to [me] and [my] ilk?” That seems rather ominous. I hope that the foundering member of the Fluffer List isn’t threatening me.

Sadly that’s true. There’s a lot of blame to go around in this situation. Unfortunately what should be the concomitant accountability is absent. Which means that instead of trying to accept the report as constructive criticism and a useful learning tool the plan likely will be to bury it and to ignore its findings. As I recall you’re the one who injected the Fluffer question into this morning’s discussion. Unfortunately it was answered in a way that seems to have dampened your cheer and brought you chagrin.

Actually if it was rephrased it wasn’t the same question and in fact was a variant of the original question. Another gem from the apparently self-styled intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong community on this message board.

Hoax. Your malaise actually is related to your status as the founding member of the Fluffer List.

I’ll reiterate the question to the Fluffer Listee: is today’s GAO report about the ineptitude of the Trump Administration with respect to its COVID-19 response a hoax?

You’re so confused. Your last question was about whether Trump wrote notes with respect to that meeting. Unfortunately this is a good example of why you’re on the Fluffer List.

Actually my goal is to learn from the purported intellectual standard bearer of this community what exactly a fluffer is. Perhaps without your input on this important subject I will be forced to assume that you are a fluffer. Along those lines, and until further notice, I have no choice but to put you on the Fluffer List. Congratulations, sir!

How could I have “bobbed and weaved” when this was the first time the question was posed? And, frankly, your question is poorly phrased (as usual, might I add) and unanswerable. I have no idea whether “Trump [wrote] the notes about the White House meeting on January 4, 2017.” I don’t know the “notes” to which you refer. Along those lines, it is possible that Trump subsequently wrote a note or notes about that meeting without having attended such gathering. I suppose that we may learn the answer to your poorly-presented question if and when Trump’s presidential materials are placed in a publicly-available archive.

Again, what’s a fluffer? You seem to have some knowledge, and possibly some expertise, in this area. Please enlighten us as to what you mean. *** Question. Is today’s GAO report about the ineptitude of the Trump Administration with respect to its COVID-19 response a hoax?

He’ll lie about it. Just like he lies about everything else. “It was a slippery ramp!” “I ran down the stairs!” “I didn’t order a slowdown of testing. Or maybe I did!” In the meantime, if he’d like to stop the guesswork about his Obamagate Hoax, perhaps he could enlighten all of his who wait breathlessly for information on this very important subject.

Self-reflection is a good thing.

Hoax. Trump’s probably lying about that, too. If it walks like a duck, and if it talks like a duck . . . .

That’s a bit of a long sentence. Try deleting “is being overshadowed by” and inserting “overshadows.” If I’m going to be insulted, I demand that it be done with proper grammar. Any time Trump feels like getting around to telling the truth is fine with me. What’s a fluffer?

And that's the point. It's just a guess. Another Trump Hoax, if you will.

Hoax. Also a bit ironic, given your penchant for name-calling and denigration. But your grammar has improved. That's a plus. It's Thursday, June 25, and as of yet nobody has specified what exactly #Obamagate is. Nope. This is my playground, too. And I don't consider the services I provide here pollution. Rather, I'm cleaning up the toxicity that abounded in this right-wing, alt-wrong echo chamber before I arrived.

Pardon?

Still didn’t answer the question about what you do for a living. I’ll take a whack at a response. You’re a moderately educated lower middle class white guy who blames somebody else for the fact that, despite your hard and honest work at your relatively menial job, you never quite reached the station in life you think you deserved. This is mostly due to the fact that you didn’t work quite as hard as you thought you did, you didn’t prioritize education early in life, and the hard work in which you engaged was directed toward the wrong things. Deep down, you know you’re a loser and you put others down to try to make yourself feel better. Basically the classic narrative of the white lowlife southerner who dumps on minorities and others not because he hates but because putting others down means he doesn’t have the shittiest life of the bunch. I’ll assume I nailed it until I hear otherwise.

Performed on my what? Hoax. It was your question. Your poorly phrased question, for what it’s worth.

cork deep I imagine.

Hoax. What is it that you do for a living?

Hoax. Sophistry is the perfect word for what happened today. It’s not about Flynn. It’s about the rule of law. https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEI9uxhyk7W_Vpi7JlTakcWsqFQgEKg0IACoGCAowuLUIMNFnMLnhAg?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen