WotAGuy

Agreed. I prefer acceptance of reality and planning to deal with reality than whining and complaining and feeling like I’m being persecuted. I think some people in this thread saw what was coming and are not surprised and are accepting reality. That doesn’t mean we condone what is happening. The people being blindsided are those that are reading about 50k PSLs and extrapolating that to the entire stadium - especially STHs in the best 100 level seats that weren’t “club” seats, but now apparently will be. Those people are understandably worried about their ability to continue to be STHs at the same seating arrangement. That will all be revealed shortly. Then there are those that just want to slap their ***** around trying to garner attention and pretend to be a big boy/girl/other. 🤣 The fact you conflate explanations with defending proves the persecution complex going on here.

Sorry, haven’t read through the entire thread yet. Did Andre have something to say about Diggs recently?

Nor understand what a problem Diggs had become to team attitude and morale.

Someone from Legends on line 1…..

So I guess we can assume the Bills heard they are going to be on Hard Knocks this year and McDermottt didn’t want Diggs to embarrass him, so he told Beane to give him the boot. If the cap hit is minimized, this is a huge win for the Bills. They need guys that are going to step up in the playoffs, and hopefully they will draft someone - anyone - that will do that other than Josh.

Obfuscate…..now we’re getting into your area of expertise!

Guess that’s a no. You would rather argue your obtuse, unrelated points than what the Bills true strategy is. Given your lack of knowledge about sports marketing, it’s ok. We forgive you. Gimme a laugh emoji if you agree you’re wrong. Damn, you deleted it. 😝

Dude, you are just rephrasing points that others made 10 pages ago. Do you have an original thought to contribute or not? Wait, that was you making these points 10 pages ago. Still irrelevant to the fact the Bills hired Legends to get rid of the fat, old fannies in the best seats and get the fannies in there that will spend big $$. I mean, even you can figure that out, no? Edit: guess not. We tried!

But there are two entirely different populations of customers - one eats those tiny hot dogs on sticks, and the other drinks Genny Cream Ale and sets themselves on fire. It’s not apples and apples. One doesn’t predict the other. What you fail to comprehend is the Bills want to lose the Cyglinski family with 8 seats on the 50 and replace them with casino people. Or Pepsi people. Or Draftkings people. Those families taking up prime $$ seats need to go and be replaced by revenue generators. The only thing that can be predicted so far is that you will lock onto an obscure, irrelevant aspect of the discussion to draw people away from the fact you don’t know anything about this PSL business. I guarantee the Legends people are reading all the whining and threats to opt out on Facebook and saying “Good riddance! Now we can bring in revenue generators and make some $$ on our best assets.”

….and if there’s anyone that knows about “soft assets”, it’s @Einstein

That’s because having an undertaker in your club seats brings everyone down. Time for them to go and be replaced with Casino people.

It’s PhD brainiac, and there no apostrophe. Apparently there are no English majors under you on the Chick-fil-A org chart.

Nine hours ago you wrote: Keep in mind, according to the Bills, 1 in 4 aren't renewing. That's pretty bad for most businesses to lose a quarter of your customers. Are you feeling ok Einstein? After this edible, I was gonna have sex with my wife, but maybe I should stick around and help you out? Sample size? Bah!

It’s always “I meant to say”. The refrain of the wrong.

There are not 60,000 season ticket holders if they each hold 2.5 seats. Ipsofatso your analysis is flawed from the start. Let’s look at it with a different Z value: Einstein = not smart.

The 25% represents those that didn’t accept the first offer. I wonder if that does or does not include people like @Mr Info, who declined to purchase the day of his presentation but ended up buying some time after? Also, with the survey, I would think the Bills had an idea what the decline rate would be, since the sharp increase in cost would scare off a fair number of non-corporate and small corporate STHs for the new clubs. Like Kirby alluded to, it could be the Bills have new corporate clients lined up to take the declined seats. I could see some companies thinking the new stadium and upgraded amenities make it more attractive to bring in new clients, as opposed to your undertakers, etc. So, to take the 25% and run with it like it’s a sign of failure (looking at you @Einstein) may be missing the mark.

Very much so. When I joined in 2004, SDS told me very specifically “THERE WILL BE NO MATH”.

Long-winded answer with math equations incoming in 3, 2, 1…..

And gouging the taxpayers who paid to have the stadium built in 1973 by doubling the ticket price. Einstein probably has an equation to prove this is an affront to Bills fans everywhere. If the tickets were even sold to Bills fans. Outrageous I tell ya!

Tell him to relocate to the 300s so he can afford his new stadium seat location.

From what little information I can gather, the least expensive seats in the upper levels are going to be covered. The uncovered seats are the fairly expensive lower bowl seats in the bottom half of those sections. The people claiming they aren’t going to go from a present 100-level seat to a club seat in the new stadium may find the view and overhead coverage is pretty attractive for a cheaper seat up top.

Mafia drops down from the ceiling and crashes through a flaming table….while eating a chicken wing. “Howdy folks, and welcome to the Bills 7th round selection!”