GG

In your face Bill

You're in IT. The guy is from Central Casting.

They already know it.

I agree with this take. PS I despised the Last Jedi

You can't have it both ways. You can't claim that the catchy memes are perfect for like-minded thinkers and then claim that the memes can have can effect an election outcome. For the latter to apply, memes also have to be effective to sway someone's mind, which I haven't seen you argue at all.

You tacitly admit that the ads aren't effective because you constantly make fun of internet memes. If you were truly concerned about their meddling, you'd be more outraged that the country got hijacked by a wayward investigation of a President. You seem to want credit for admitting that Russia interfered, but your actions certainly don't support your position that you really care about the true effects of that meddling, because then you'd have to admit that Greggy was right.

Not really. Ultra orthodox have generally been very conservative. The only time they've strayed was when Senator-to-be-Hillary bribed some senior rep from a heavily Hasid enclave and 95% of the town voted for her.

Doesn't this prove that Russians weren't successful in shaping the election results if they were simply preaching to the choir with their catchy memes?

You don't know if they actually ran more anti-Hillary ads. You only know the ads that were specifically highlighted in the subsequent investigations which had a singular purpose. Of course anyone with an ounce of objectivity would also understand that if your primary goal is to sow discord, you would very likely devote a majority of your efforts to discredit the overwhelming favorite in any given election. Congratulations for falling for the ruse as well.

Cognitive dissonance? You don't think this little passage is the most dangerous, damning and utterly wrong in the entire assessment? We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.

Which part of this critical ICA passage is correct? Which passage threw the US into a crisis for nearly 3 years? We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.

You have to go back to the 2010 season

This is your typical disingenuous response. You are now using Russian interference to deflect years of hiding behind the ICA as a way to tie Trump and his people to Russian interference. Never mind that the actual Russian interference was minimal in relation to the election, compared to sowing discord by feeding the disinformation that was the basis of the ICA in the first place. You have yet to acknowledge that difference and how much more hurtful it was. Because for you to acknowledge that would mean admitting that on this point, Greggy was right. Instead you throw in all your other disagreements with him as a way to discredit the one thing that he's been absolutely spot on so far.

You took an early position and didn't deviate. How many times you and your aliases parrot the ICA as if it were gospel? Did you and did you not use it as the basis for alleged collusion? Do you still fall back on for your apparent anti-partisan position?

One of those is correct.

Wasn't really referring to either Bill.

In other words, a perfect opportunity for a scam artist to take the ownership & fan base for a ride?

That's because he also gouges the elderly.

Different positions for the DTs. I don't see Star getting cut, but they may look to cut his salary by a few mil. Could be win win for both. He's valuable to the D, but not worth $10 mil

Not wise politically because it gives the swing district Dems an out.

Unfortunately, we also weren't "In the Hunt" for many years for the wrong reasons.

There's a reason that game led to a drastic refocus of the offense.

I guess you have a reputation to uphold. BTW, shouldn't you be scouring decade old posts for other obscure non-sequiturs?

Maybe we're arguing the targets? To me, a short pattern by BeaSley is the same as the TE or RB target, and Daboll dialed up a bunch of those plays where Allen ignored the open looks or simply misfired in the first half. He finally calmed down on the last drive of the half to see the short stuff, and the offense started to move. I just did a quick look back of the 1st half All-22 from that game. There were a few tips, but misfires and wrong reads were the primary culprits in the half.

Take another look at the replay. The opening two drives had designed short routes where Allen misfired badly. There were only a handful of plays in the half where the design didn't give Allen a short outlet or the short route wasn't the primary option. That first half was mostly on Allen, not Daboll.