GG

There were plenty of articles about troop deployments and how there were no prior warnings. Isn't that part of the deal when you sign up?

That was the best monologue for the audience and times.

I love me some Ricky Gervais

Was it a Biden campaign stop?

Funny how criticism of Soros is always attacked as hidden anti-semitism, yet criticism of an Orthodox guy who openly uses Old Testament lessons in this sessions, is not hidden anti-semitism.

Then why did you pipe in with a pissed cereal comment about waiting for next year to see if Allen improves, if your answer is “not yet”

The plan is quite simple. But lets address the main point. The OP is wrong, because it’s not a binary Yes/No question. When you can recognize the basic foundation of what the Bills have at QB this moment, then we can discuss solutions. In in the meantime, see you next year.

I’ll be here all day Johnny. Keep pretending that somehow you made a point. Go cry in your milk until next year, and maybe come up with a plan of fixing the QB position in time for next September.

Aren't you the little snowflake.

Not yet is not an answer to a binary yes/no question. Thanks for playing.

Let me slow it down for you Johnny. Josh Allen is the most athletic raw QB prospect the Bills had in a long time, and everyone should have been prepared for a long learning curve. He was bad last year, and took pretty big strides this year, but not enough to establish himself as a true NFL QB. But that doesn't mean that at this point in time, he's a bust, and that's why NEXT YEAR IS CRITICAL to see if he can clear the hurdle. Did you understand the words that were capitalized? If you are tired of the cliche of waiting until the next season, then what is your solution to the apparent Josh Allen problem?

Again, the binary question posed in the OP is not the right way to approach it. Allen has given enough fodder this year for both sides to argue the point, but not enough evidence to settle the point. But to answer your tangent, Tyrod only delivered 3 points in his playoff outing. I doubt he puts up more points, let alone thinking he could drive down for the tying FG. Good for you then. Why are you arguing the point that the "Maybe" option is missing in the poll?

Then I take it your answer is a no. See, not so hard is it?

That's a different discussion in other threads. We're discussing whether Josh is a franchise QB in this one.

Yeah I know, but what else is there? Josh hasn't answered the big Q yet.

How about a Maybe choice? Next year is key

Looks like that's the picture that he provides to Cameo, which was probably taken when the team invited him back around the time of the Dallas game. Highly unlikely they came to an agreement, and he just blew whatever case he had.

Not for nottin, but did Miller clear the use of the Bills logo and NEF for his paid Cameo appearances?

Apparently out 5-6 weeks. Woof

What are you talking about? This was reported last night as well.

Maybe this bridges the tactical and strategic(with liberal borrowing from past Homeland plots.) Let's go back to the drone downing and attacks on the Saudi refineries, and the speculation around that time that the attacks were not "fully" approved by the mullahs and there was probably a faction within IRCG and Quds that wanted to escalate the conflict. If Trump's only mode was tit-for-tat responses, that would have been the more obvious time to strike back, and was probably expected by that Iranian element. But nothing happened, because Trump has shown patience to execute the counterattack to wait for a better time for him (like we're still waiting for the reveal on the 12th). It's also likely that there were pretty serious discussions behind the scenes to figure out the factions and try to turn the side that didn't like the escalation. Which brings us to this week and the very rapid turn of events starting with a random attack on a US installation in Iraq, USA's destruction of militia outpost, the storming of the Embassy, and the immediate killing of Soleimani. Although these seem like randomly connected parts with Trump acting on impulse, if you take a step back, you'd see that it's very hard for this kind of an operation to be carried out on a whim (Folks already forgot about the additional 4K troops deployed to the area last month). The critical part of the last sequence is USA's precise knowledge not just of Soleimani's travel log but the specific convoy he was in, since there were apparently three to choose from. If you argue that the US just got lucky, then why not shoot down all three convoys to make sure they get the guy? All this hints that US was getting very strong intel from inside the Iranian camp, and that this has been in planning for a long time, which possibly includes plans for the next step. If you believe in a diplomatic solution, then a crucial step is to remove the impediment in Iran to that solution. Iran's economy is on its back and internal unrest is growing. Their only options are to sit down with Trump, or go down in a blaze of glory. All signs are pointing to Soleimani being the voice of going down with the ship, so he needed to be removed. This theory will be tested in the next week by actions inside and outside Iran. Funny part is if it was anyone but Trump in charge, people would be talking about the brilliant execution of taking down a sworn enemy.

Wasn’t it a breakaway?

Noticed nobody is bringing up Benghazi anymore.

Laughed that there’s no way NJ makes the trade. Erod never came close to 20 goals and somehow makes $2 mil

Someone brought this up on Sabrespace and was immediately laughed at.