GG

Very telling that the first shot across the bow of AT&T board of directors has been fired, elevating this beyond the newsroom.

The knives are out, now that Biden has attacked Bernie directly.

By my count, they were outshot 11-0 in the last 12 minutes of the game. I can critique that effort.

Which prompts the question from the hearing crowd, 'The videos have sound?'

Direct contact with skin is clearly better, but maybe the bat buzzer is less conspicuous and you can have better electronics inside the bat.

Why would you think that? I think hardwood is a great conductor of vibration. Ever live below someone walking in high heels?

I guess he's still alive?

I misread that one. But, I haven't seen any reports where Miami confirmed they are playing in Mexico City

Because the writer said Dolphins are on Packers schedule next year

That can't be correct, because AFC east is playing vs NFC West next year

Democrats screwed the pooch once they allowed the Independent Bernie inside their tent. Now the bell can't be unrung. They're finding out what happens when you make Communists your bedfellows.

This is what happens when you put two low IQ people in the same proximity.

I don't get involved in random tangents. You were asked a basic question in this thread, like you've been asked basic questions in other threads. You always choose to run away.

These stories caught my eye when there were so many alarms about the conditions of The Great Barrier Reef around 2015, obviously attributed to the global warming calamity. Turns out, they didn't even know at the time there were massive eruptions near New Zealand a few years prior, with ongoing activity. The entire Ring of Fire has been hyperactive over the past decade, and I'm guessing they really have no clue of the true underwater activity.

In other words, you can't answer why all this info was dumped on the eve of articles being transmitted to Senate.

This has to be the world's worst quid pro quo ever.

It's been asked before but ignored. Wouldn't the oceans' temperature rise faster due to warming that's occurring under water - ie undersea volcanic activity - rather than from atmospheric warming?

And no Pat Benatar again? Joke.

Roadtrip

Totally against censorship. I guess the question is - How or should information be shared about serious offenses that are in the public domain?

My guess is that we'll discover that Knox can't see out of his left eye.

A former frequent poster has a public record on a topic that's frequently discussed here.

Ayup - but not the family. Only the wife.

For starters, this is the link to the board's ToS (a few more carriage returns wouldn't hurt). I also do not want to dictate policy on a forum that I do not control. At the end of the day, we are at Scott's mercy and discretion. For that, we should be grateful for opening up this sandbox and letting it be more open to exchanges, no matter how rancid they may turn. Predictably, as some topics have gotten more heated, we need to address the elephant in the room of what should be done when posters are discovered to have a criminal past. As is the case with any community, this site is populated by many folks who have been convicted of something - all the way from speeding tickets to the ultimate sin (and many things in between). The question we face is how to handle this properly, just like any functioning community would. I am against openly doxing individuals on a forum that allows anonymity, especially when the offense is not public. I would also engage the poster privately first, if someone made me aware of allegations (such as a certain FB incident a few years back) But if the crime had been committed and is in the public records, then people are free to apply their standards of airing the news. I think if the crime is serious and would affect the discourse, then I believe it should be disclosed to the community. Appreciate all opinions.

Why didn't the House insist on his testimony? It's their job. PS, why did the House introduce this evidence now and not part of their proceedings? If you are a lawyer, what would this say about your abilities?