OGTEleven

So you're saying Kobe cheats on his wife (at best) and then rats out other guys that do the same thing? If you're talking about the POLICE REPORT in which Kobe implies Shaq had to pay off women (still unproven and always irreleavent to KB's case), would you have been mad if you were Shaq?

Based on what is Shaq a scumbag? Leaving the Lakers does not count. We know why Reggie Theus, er I mean Kobe is a dirt ball, What is it with Shaq fu?

Who cares about rape allegations anyway? The chick was probably wearing a miniskirt and asking for it.

The avatar in the 2nd post is a friggin cowbell.

The Bills are wearing their throwbacks on opening day and one road game (it MUST be SD). Are the Texans wearing throwbacks too? If so to what will they throw? Maybe their logo was a quarter in smaller in their first season. They could use the Oilers unis (if so I hope they get a 35-3 lead early in the 2nd half). Dallas Texans? Our throwbacks are very cool IMO. The crowd that day will likely be unreal. Opening day a new qb and throwbacks = loud. I hate to wish away the summer but geez.

Step 1: Nancy Boy Step 2: Pedophile with bad taste I can't imagine what step 3 could possibly hold.

No offense, but a thread complaining about French Vanilla coffee makes the term "Nancy-boy" instantly pop into my head. I can't help it. It just happens.

This guy's kid might have been better than the kid who won, but clearly the award should have gone to Mark Mulder.

Swerving off topic: Do any of you guys remember a thread that was linked from TBD? It was from a Texas or Oklahoma fan website and they were busting on the other team by referencing recruiting efforts in Afghanistan. It was about a 7 page long thread and extremely funny.

Your original post stated that Reed's drops were "notable and recurrent". I took notable to mean you would remember them. Do the research if you want. I just asked the question, you were the one that made the statement. Here's a head start: He dropped a flea flicker that should have been caught in a game we won 31-0. There was another game (at home) where he dropped a catchable but tough ball in the red zone. It was over the middle of the field. It might have gone for 6. It was far from an easy catch, but it would not have made the "world's greatest catch" video reel if he made it. After that it has been a parade of naysayers. Most of their statements are like yours. I haven't seen any with specifics. I also didn't see Bledsoe hit too many middle of the field throws to anyone except for he occasional Campbell circus catch.

Name a few. And please enlighten us with their difficulty level and importance in the game.

Did you get to hand out the punishment for that kid in the non Bills gear? Since you're a Godfather you should have given him an offer he couldn't refuse.

From the same person who brought you: B E A U tiful

In your first post you attributed the traits of one driver to all americans. Do you think that might be over generalizing a bit? You also called americans egotistical. That doesn't seem very pro-american. There are no humble americans/ego maniacal euros? Are there any good drivers here? Are there any bad drivers in the all hallowed europe? There is no doubt that there are many bad drivers. Some are too speedy/agresssive. Some are too slow/inattentive. My bet is that europe has their share too. I don't think it is because americans are arrogant. And another thing..... One thing that proves europeans are bad drivers: they ALL drive on the wrong friggin side of the road. Morons.

How did you manage to turn even that into an "America sucks" rant?

He probably didn't take too many math classes at school. He goes on and on about our playmakers and how they'll take pressure of of Losman. Net result: 4-12 I don't want to turn this into a bash Bledsoe thread, but how bad would he have to play to take the team from 9-7 to 4-12 given the qb play that got us to 9-7. If he used the line as rationale, I could see a negative spin, but 4-12 seems silly. Maybe he is predicting mass injuries but doesn't want to print it.

The Middle East has not had a problem generating terrorists to this point. At MOST, Gitmo will be one item in a long list of recruiting tools. If they don't have Gitmo to cry foul over, they'll find something else. If we do close Gitmo and/or let these people out, do you think they'll see it as a sign of weakness?

The thing about triplets (and the fertility comments) make me re-think this article. Disclaimer: I only know what I have read here. I have not looked anywhere else for information on this topic. Based on this I think this whole thing is phony. It is replete with cliches. I can't leave Manhattan for Staten Island. I won't make enough money this spring. Men don't understand what women go through. I'll have to shop at Costco. It could be something stirred up by anti-abortionists to further advance stereotypes of women who want abortions. It could be done by an abortion advocate to assert complete and utter rights over the decision no matter how callous it seems. In either case there are way too many pieces in place. It is all tidy. There is no complexity to it. All real stories have some level of complexity. If I assume it is real, I can't really comment other than to say that the writer is (IMO) pathetic and does not herself understand what life really is at all.

Evidently CTM, Ghost an Pac are all members of a visually and judgementally impaired subspecies that somehows sees Nicole Kidman not only as good looking but also as improving. In the latest photos I've seen of her, she looks like she has had 238 too many surgeries and her eyebrows are in a perpetual leering state. To each his own I guess, but when the subspecies containment camp draft rolls around, you can pass on her in the first few rounds because my camp ain't taking her.

I think it is clear that you are against interracial marriage. With that said, I would like to know how you define "race". Is it simply by skin color? If not, what other traits come in to play when defining race. If so, why do you stop at skin? No two people on the planet (ignoring twins) have exactly the same traits so evidently not all genes help define race. That is unless you think only twins should be allowed to be married and only to each other. Let's take my marriage as an example: Skin color: same Eye color: different Hair color: different Height: similar based on norms for the sexes Nationality: Same continent, different country Religion: Same ( but not genetic) Is ours an interacial marriage? Are there other traits that need to be examined before discerning? If the mating of two individuals produces offspring are they not of the same race by definition? If not, please define your terms.

Amsterdam? Geez, that's an old mill town and is really run down. Set your sights higher, like Schenectady.

Sounds legit to me. I'd do it. If you don't:

As an obnoxious bystander, the one thing I learned is that colleges must be lowering their standards.

I'll give OL, maybe DL, but I'd certainly prefer the best LBs to the best TEs.

In case you haven't noticed, Jerry Rice (as good as he has been) is about one thing....Jerry Rice. He has stated he wants to be a #1 or #2 receiver wherever he goes. He can't be that here. I know everyone likes a good opportunity to slam Josh Reed but using Jerry Rice as an excuse is a reach. Reed had one prominent drop that I remember. The flea flicker in what turned out to be a 31-0 win. It hardly changed the complexion of the game. He (like every other receiver in the game) has dropped others, some of which probably should have been caught. Big deal. Outside of a few miracle grabs by Campbell, how many completions did the Bills have in the middle of the field the last few years? Not many. A very high % of the completions were to the outside. We have a new QB now. Maybe we'll be able to use that part of the field again. Whether it's Reed, Parrish or even Aiken, I'll take my chances versus Rice at this point in his career.