kitchen sink

Here is the best I could do.

Based on this trend, mine would be any trade up in the first round that costs more than pick 132.

My best mock, which would make me very happy.

Thank you for recognizing that I am not trying to be a jerk. There actually are calculations that can determine with a reasonable level of accuracy how many reps you can bench at one weight compared to another weight based on the number of reps at that first weight. People use them all the time to determine how many reps they should be doing at various percentages of the one rep max. It is one way to test how close to failure you are getting, which is one of the more important factors in muscle and strength growth. The attached image is the results from the calculator you can find at https://strengthlevel.com/one-rep-max-calculator It is based on your 5 reps at 225 lbs and it appears I was being generous at the 20 reps of 175lbs. My thought is that you might also have been able to do more than 5 reps, but did not push all the way to failure, in which case you might have been able to get closer to 35 reps at 175lbs Unfortunately, it appears that you never tried to see how many reps you could have done at that time at your body weight so we can't test this in the best manner.

I don't want to be a jerk, but I think I have more familiarity with this space. If you could do 5 reps of 225, you would not have been able to do 35 reps of 175. You might have been able to get 20. Strength to weight is not a linear relationship. As you get heavier you do not progress in strength at the same rate.

I beg to differ, how many reps of 225 can you do?

I don't have the words to tell you how much I hope and pray this comes true!

I hope this helps; Garrett, is the best at beating double teams, even though his is one of the most frequently double teamed players.

My guesstimate is that due to the growing use of analytics, the value of speed wide receivers might continue to decline (it might also be a reason for increased interest in high contested catch rate receivers). The reason for this is when you look at the analytics, it is much better to force a team to make as many first downs as possible to score. As such, teams might play more and more two high shell and other over the top defensive alignments. The data I have seen shows that the probability of getting a first down from 1st and 10 is 66%. Based on this, every additional first down required to score reduces the probability of the next first down by 33%, as shown in the table below. . This is also the math behind what makes chunk plays (20 plus yards), which reduce the number of first downs required to score, so big.

It does for me.

Maybe just my opinion, but when you murder people in cold blood you should lose everything.

I hope they didn't count me because I did not watch one second of that joke.

My only concern with this is that we would be giving the other teams too much practice at stopping the play.

Go and watch anything on YouTube about the game.

I would need to see the statistics on this, before I could comment.

If there is something other than this that I could care less about than this I don't know what it would be.

Bills 51 Broncos 3

Aim low miss low. I guess 100 billion dollars 🤣

I have been so confused on the Bills this year. I mean Coach McDermott and GM Brandon Bean actually know their team better than all the NFL talking heads? How can this be? 🤣

Welcome to the world of artificial intelligence. Is someone going to tell Jerry Seinfeld that he is engaged to Josh Allen?🤣

I suspect that Josh Allen, who has a much more informed position than any of us, would disagree with you on this.

Lions 44 Bills 24

1. Nope 2. Nope These are some of the most interesting post on the site for me. I always have these questions in my mind about what experience people have on which to base their perspective. Have they ever supervised another person? Have they ever coached a team at any level? Have they ever supervised 80 plus other persons? Have they ever supervised a bunch of exceptionally high paid athletes in arguably the most competitive and highly scrutinized sport in the USA? I have always thought that most folks would have to answer no to ail of these questions, with everyone answering no to the last. As such, our perspectives are not very well based, but it does make for fun conversation and debate!

For all of you who replied that the player was going for the ball and that this is no big deal, I disagree. If a player is going at a QB to block a pass, but hits the QB in the head it is a penalty. This should be no different. As a player you are responsible for the outcome of your actions.

Sorry if there is another thread on this, but I did not see it if there is. I am not sure how many folks caught this, but on his touchdown run the second defender to hit him at the goal line #23 punched him in the head. It was a glancing shot, but if you carefully watch the video you will see Josh's head snap to his right. I think there was some discussion about the Colts defender throwing multiple bunches at Josh and hitting him in the head last week. This is starting to become a trend that can not continue! I am sure that both players would say they were trying to punch the ball out, but they need to be fined, severely, if they miss and hit a player in the head.