Sierra Foothills

Just think of it as a comedy...

Don't judge me...

I missed it... I was trying to think of something clever to type.

He's the "stack" in "stack and shed." But it's true... also it's not the plays he makes but the ones he takes away. From what I understand it's like some sort of Jedi mind trick or something like that.

Well, Geno felt the pressure but chose not to do anything about it.

True. His age is about the same as his 40 time which is pretty impressive.

It's Geno's 12th season and they feel they need to protect him. No. Not until May 2nd.

The Bears are kind of like the Jets of the NFC.

Youthful jitters. How many current NFL Head Coaches are named Mike McDonald?

From what people here are saying, his act isn't playing too well in Chicago.

In theory. On the other hand many were expecting excellent games yesterday and both of them were disappointing to say the least. You never know what you're gonna get. I agree. Give him time.

I see where Tremaine just dropped an interception. That part of his game will improve with age. I do like Charbonnet... good, underrated runner. Also I like the new Seattle HC... and Geno Smith is somewhere between good and bad. Physically he's got it all. Seattle has lost their last two to the Packers and the Vikings.

I see where people are now repeating the same arguments over and over because too many people here don't bother reading through the entire topic... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... In an 11 page topic, if you read the topic from the beginning you'll invariably see that someone (or two, or three, or four, or five, or six, or seven, etc.) has already made the point that you're going to make. Every single salient point on this discussion has probably already been made numerous times. But by all means, make your voice heard because everyone's voice should be heard, even if no one's voice is heard. Because someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... 🙃

The term "sophomore slump" exists for a reason. This is fair. I sincerely hope that the $2.8 million that Dell's grossed so far has been allocated wisely. As for comparisons to the Dorsey Meltdown, I'm not seeing the relevance. Dorsey's was an angry reaction to poor execution/outcome. Stroud's was a traumatized reaction to a gruesome injury to a close friend. Not seeing it.

I don't really agree with your characterization, partly because I don't know the actual language of the rule. But I bet I could write the rule more simply than it is currently written.

People can make all the arguments they want as far as who is more deserving in the MVP race. Personally i feel Josh deserved it last year when he didn't get it. I think it's too close to call this year but Lamar has a slight edge and Josh has to hold serve now... which I hope really isn't a priority for Josh or the Bills. I think a better question is "Who bought into the hype?"

What makes you so sure Josh is gonna win?

AM or FM?

I have a friend who is a re-districting strategist (gerrymanderer) but don't get your hopes up... this sort of thing typically takes a long time.

That's an excellent question. Also, has anyone here heard about a "good poster award?"

Hmmmm... then maybe they should try several of those fair catch/field goal attempts...

What's the NFL record?

I'm cautiously optimistic. I've tried very hard to contribute to the conversation here... Perhaps I should PM one of the mods...

What if that person just had a conviction that a safety was gonna happen? Also, how does one get nominated for a good poster award?