Sierra Foothills

Youthful jitters. How many current NFL Head Coaches are named Mike McDonald?

From what people here are saying, his act isn't playing too well in Chicago.

In theory. On the other hand many were expecting excellent games yesterday and both of them were disappointing to say the least. You never know what you're gonna get. I agree. Give him time.

I see where Tremaine just dropped an interception. That part of his game will improve with age. I do like Charbonnet... good, underrated runner. Also I like the new Seattle HC... and Geno Smith is somewhere between good and bad. Physically he's got it all. Seattle has lost their last two to the Packers and the Vikings.

I see where people are now repeating the same arguments over and over because too many people here don't bother reading through the entire topic... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... In an 11 page topic, if you read the topic from the beginning you'll invariably see that someone (or two, or three, or four, or five, or six, or seven, etc.) has already made the point that you're going to make. Every single salient point on this discussion has probably already been made numerous times. But by all means, make your voice heard because everyone's voice should be heard, even if no one's voice is heard. Because someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... so someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously.... then someone makes a point that's already been made 6-7 times previously that now gets buried... and then others who also haven't read through the topic rebut those posts making the same rebuttals that have been made 6-7 times previously... 🙃

The term "sophomore slump" exists for a reason. This is fair. I sincerely hope that the $2.8 million that Dell's grossed so far has been allocated wisely. As for comparisons to the Dorsey Meltdown, I'm not seeing the relevance. Dorsey's was an angry reaction to poor execution/outcome. Stroud's was a traumatized reaction to a gruesome injury to a close friend. Not seeing it.

I don't really agree with your characterization, partly because I don't know the actual language of the rule. But I bet I could write the rule more simply than it is currently written.

People can make all the arguments they want as far as who is more deserving in the MVP race. Personally i feel Josh deserved it last year when he didn't get it. I think it's too close to call this year but Lamar has a slight edge and Josh has to hold serve now... which I hope really isn't a priority for Josh or the Bills. I think a better question is "Who bought into the hype?"

What makes you so sure Josh is gonna win?

AM or FM?

I have a friend who is a re-districting strategist (gerrymanderer) but don't get your hopes up... this sort of thing typically takes a long time.

That's an excellent question. Also, has anyone here heard about a "good poster award?"

Hmmmm... then maybe they should try several of those fair catch/field goal attempts...

What's the NFL record?

I'm cautiously optimistic. I've tried very hard to contribute to the conversation here... Perhaps I should PM one of the mods...

What if that person just had a conviction that a safety was gonna happen? Also, how does one get nominated for a good poster award?

Just curious, how does one get nominated for the award? I would not be opposed to being considered for the award if someone were to nominate me...

You didn't have to tell me. Todd Monken vs Bobby Slowik is a mismatch.

The rest vs rust "problem" is one I'd gladly embrace.

I love a great a capella performance.

Posted elsewhere: The answer to whether they should start the final 2 games is the exact same as the answer to whether Ingram/Solomon/Andreesen/Carter or any young Bills player with upside should start the final 2 games... YES, as long as the degree to which he plays doesn't jeopardize winning those games. Worded differently, the only reason you wouldn't play a young player is because of the risk of losing. If you are not in danger of losing there's no reason not to give a young player with upside, playing time. So it is dependent upon game script.

Nice summation. And in no case should being one rather than the other elicit personal attacks and snarkiness. Yes, kicking field goals is only delaying the inevitable. Not yet. I believe Houston has to win (unlikely) today or we have to beat the Jets to assure the second seed.

I hope you're right and I'm wrong. They look great to me... superb.

Again, Russ continues to react a hair too slowly. Dude needs to get some stimulants in his system.