Einstein

How did Rousseau not pick that off!? Maybe it was just the angle of the TV.

A horse jockey? A small child-like person? A well trained doberman? It really wouldn’t take much to match his production.

That wasn’t even the play I was worried about haha. That big gain happened as I was typing the Hamlin is awful post.

Hamlin is awful. Truly truly awful. Hamlin is awful. Truly truly awful.

He was right.

Yeah, doesn’t matter to me. My barcalounger will still be in the same place, 140 degrees relative to the television.

I wouldn’t be so quick to say that. Sometimes teams that fire a coach have a bit of a temporary rejuvenation.

I know some people think Daboll could be fired in NY, but I think they’re crazy is they let him go. He is very hampered by his QB but still calls a great game.

Love this play calling by Daboll.

This may be clearer.

You don’t see Hutchinsons ankle/foot snapped and wrapped around another humans knee?

Mods can delete if this is deemed too gruesome.

Ben Johnson is a savant of offense.

This thread may interest you: https://www.twobillsdrive.com/community/topic/256487-chris-simms-good-and-detailed-breakdown-of-allen’s-struggles-vs-houston/page/15/ We discuss most of what you questioned. As for Maye, I watched that game… he had so much more time than Allen had, he could have built a hammock and relaxed compared to what Allen went through.

Feels like Dalton has been in the league forever

It is in this case. I posted this after a game last year where Gabe got hurt. Before Gabe was hurt Allen: 4/8 (50%), 67 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT AFTER Gabe left the game Allen: 26/30 (87%), 360 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT Did you know? Over the past two seasons, a little under 40% of Allen's interceptions occur when targeting Gabe Davis? Yet, Davis is not targeted very much… Allen played his absolute worst when targeting Gabe.

True. Not our kicker, of course. But teams with good kickers will only need to get a couple first downs to nab 3 points.

The math wasn’t the joke! Math is never a joke! I was joking that Gunnar was softening. Because he never softens. He digs in (I do too). But he didn’t get it. I’m bad at jokes.

Goodness - I really have to work on my humor. People never seem to get it.

Yeah, that’s called acceleration and was all explained in the kinematics. He would have caught Cook in 0.9 seconds. What you’re experiencing is why we don’t judge acceleration and speed by eye.

There was no forward momentum. Coleman (and the defender), came to almost a complete stop. I think Coleman thought he finished his job for that play. Thats not true. Starting from rest, he would have reached Cooks speed in 0.9 seconds. I broke down the math of this here. That defender is why Allen didn’t throw the ball. He stares right at him.

The PFF question is irrelevant to the conversation. No person, scout, coach, service or otherwise is right 100% of the time. What separates the good from the bad is their track record over time.

Lol this is the first time i’ve seen someone reference another poster here as a source. And i’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but Gunnar has begun to soften his stance on this topic. Give me a few more days and I may have him completely converted. As for Simms, it’s pretty clear he didn’t analyze the play because he completely misrepresented it. He didn’t even mention Coleman not clearing his defender. Or the missed run.

I do. Because his analysis was lazy and wrong and he is too smart for it to be so.

If Simms actually analyzed the film, he wouldn't have said what he said. The problem is that he has to talk about 32 teams so he went with what the intern gave him. I said it before - but notice how most of the plays he showed was beginning of the game? That's because they started the game film and just grabbed the first 3 or so plays they saw an open player on. This is cut and paste journalism. 31 other teams to get to. So its not that Simms is dumb. He is smart. He knows football. The problem is that he didnt actually analyze the play.