Jump to content

Einstein

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Einstein

  1. Perhaps you forgot, but I posted that McD is lying and YOU responded and attempted to correct me and say he is not. Wouldnt that mean you are always trying to be right more so than I???
  2. Ok but you admit McD was lying. I posted the same theory earlier and I think you’re right on the mark.
  3. Ok. Replacing “lie” with “mendacious” better? Can’t stand them. Tahoe.
  4. This is true. At least for much of the Country. I have a three story, with finished basement, home in Western NY that is valued at about $400k and a 1,500 sq ranch home in Florida that is valued at nearly $1M. The WNY home in Florida would be in the several million range.
  5. Agreed. Even when he had issue in Minnesota it didn’t impact his season.
  6. Alright fine i’ll add a 3rd goal to my list above: 3) Get this thread to 200 pages. People often argue with experts on topics they don’t understand.
  7. Ok but if you look back, I never made it a bigger deal. My point the entire thread was: 1) I was correct that Diggs off-season antics were not “nothing” (as many said) and that he does have some sort of issue with the organization. He is spiraling downward in his actions. 2) The Bills will sweep this all under the rug. And I explained in detail how the PR will make it look like nothing when in fact it was something. That’s it. .
  8. lol, you misread. I said that I doubt he DOESNT show up tomorrow. As in, he WILL be there. Which is the opposite of making it a bigger problem. Oof.
  9. Yeah this didn’t happen. You’re confusing me with other posters. I took my victory lap with proving Diggs off-season antics were not “nothing” as many claimed. I then even explained in detail how he would be back in practice the next day and the team would smooth it over. That’s pretty much the opposite of making it bigger. What many posters disagreed with me about is the coverup and public relations. Which is progressing exactly as I said it would.
  10. Excited is a better word. Some of us were definitely excited. Sure. It proved that many of us who said Diggs yelling at Josh and Diggs removing the Bills from social media and Diggs skipping OTA’s, was not “nothing”. It proved that we were correct that he had a problem with the organization or part of the organization (player, coach, scheme, whatever). But was there overreaction? No. Just claiming my spoils from victory. Those overreacting we’re the ones saying he should be cut, traded, etc.
  11. “Wait until you see what the PR team came up with”
  12. None of us have any facts to go off of. Just circumstantial evidence. And right now the evidence points to the team covering this up (and I don’t blame them, as it is exactly what I would do if I were them). Except for the PSE essentially owning the media part. That’s a fact.
  13. There was no overreaction. You seem to be confusing me with other posters. I never said to cut him or fine him or anything of that sort. All I said is that he is spiraling down a bad path (from yelling at his QB in the Cinci loss, to taking Bills stuff off his social media, to skipping voluntaries, to unfollowing the team, to leaving practice, etc) and that the Bills and PSE’s public relations team would try to cover it up once it’s smoothed over. And I was correct every step of the way. Zero overreaction. Those who overreacted were the ones who wanted him gone from the team, which was obviously never happening.
  14. That’s where semantics come into play. Obviously it’s all football related. Whether he doesn’t like the scheme/plays, or doesn’t like the play caller (Dorsey), or has an issue with Allen not being present in the Bengals loss, it’s all football matters. But it can be spun from another angle as well, to say, “well those are personal issues because they don’t take place on the actual football field”. So it’s a semantics game.
  15. I don’t think it was spill over. I believe it was a purposeful comment. A warning shot. I think what will eventually come out, maybe not for a year even as people tend to not go into detail when they’re still on the roster, is that Diggs stormed out after a heated conversation. McDermott then fired the shot across the bow. Purposefully. PR is putting the toothpaste back into the bottle by coming up with the narrative that it was an “excused” absence. Which obviously doesn’t make much sense since McDermott was asked yesterday whether it was an excused absence (oops). But when you own the media in town, you can steer the direction of the talk in the way that you want. And with so many diehard fans willing to believe anything they say, it doesn’t really matter what McD said in that press conference. McD could have said “I want to cut him right now” and they would easily find their way out of it due to the PSE-owned media and homers
  16. Allen saying it’s not football related, McDermott saying it was an excused absence, etc.
  17. “it was oft observed that the vanquished, despite tasting the bitter sting of defeat, did oft perceive themselves as victors in their own hearts”
×
×
  • Create New...