Prospector

At least we didn't have to lose it in the SB...

Well, considering it was 700, I figured you knew it was a Masters... but you knew that, I hope

When in Rome

My Trans professor in my 700 level class in cultural studies couldn't answer this question either. I really wanted to know why gender identity was SO accepted, yet all other identities were taboo to them. I guess "he" was more comfortable stating that being "male"(his terminology) was how you felt, but "him" saying a person born white can identify as black was a little tougher in a class filled with minorities. Why? What's the difference? It can't be science... Why can we change our gender identity, but not any other identity?! That seems very narrow minded. Heck, even income identity should come into account in this land of make believe. If you are born a rich white boy in the Hamptons, yet you identify as a poor old minority lady, who are we to not allow him(well, now her i guess) all the benefits our government has to offer for such an identity?! It's his choice! We should accept it! This is only in response to the person who wanted to distinct sex with gender, yet gender can dictate bathroom use, showers, locker rooms, and sports eligibility. It would seem that our country treats gender as if it were sex. Geez, again I apologize and I will crawl back under my rock and watch from afar. I don't mean to go on these rants, but when I see a certain political point of view not being reined in on a sports forum, I feel someone has to stand up.

I know right?! you should sue them for being insensitive bigots!

I agree 1000%

That makes sense, because of identity and all... so what about race, age, weight, height, etc? Does identity have a fancy word for those also? Again, asking for a friend. This isn't a political forum so I will end it here...

Yeah, I think we all get it. Goodness

Is that like "New York man ignores scientific evidence when it pertains to number of genders"? Asking for a friend... and wondering which science is the real science

I wish these draft simulator sites were more logical, but here is my last First-Picks draft for use. I chose to draft a K and P because I don't really see us having 7 potential roster makers in this draft... maybe 3 at the most, not counting kicker and punter. Anyways, I know each of these players I drafted before round 6 are most likely gone in an actual draft: Round 2 Pick 22: D'Andre Swift, RB, Georgia (A+) Round 3 Pick 22: Kyle Dugger, SS/FS, Lenoir-Rhyne (A+) Round 4 Pick 22: Chase Claypool, WR/TE, Notre Dame (A+) Round 5 Pick 9: K.J. Hill, WR, Ohio St. (A+) Round 6 Pick 9: Braden Mann, P, Texas A&M (A+) Round 6 Pick 22: Tyler Bass, K, Ga. Southern (A+) Round 7 Pick 25: Carter Coughlin, OLB, Minnesota (A+)

If that’s the case, then let’s draft that mamma jamma!

Rodrigo Blankenship nailed a few 50 yarders this year, and broke Georgia's Touch-backs record. If we keep all of our picks, I wouldn't mind using both our 6th rounders on Blankenship and Mann.

This stadium is ridiculously awesome. Being a Vegas native and driving by it on a weekly basis, along with a couple tours inside... holy guacamole, you guys need to make plans to come see this wonder! Go Bills, and Go Raiders!... but go Bills first

These are bad college uniforms. I can imagine Oregon rolling these puppies out on Halloween weekend.

Roscoe is the really only true answer. If we are talking just punt returning, it is Roscoe, no question or debate.

Why

Mr. Balloon hands

BB doesn’t use jack@ss QBs that want to promote their brand or act like high school attention whor3s to run his offense. He uses a smart, mature, QB that makes sound decisions. Brady was that ten fold. Cam and Jameis are the exact opposite. I doubt they have the maturity level of a middle schooler... and that is a slight against middle schoolers.

There was a thread earlier this week of what BB looks for at each position. And who did he use when TB was out? Matt Cassel. It’s not assumption.

Are either considered cerebral QBs? Billacheat likes thinkers and good decision makers over athletes and gun slingers. I don’t think you have payed attention to anything BB has done over the last 20 years

I think he’s been doing a lot of texting already

I would expect CNN to post something like this, not TSW

Yeah, my bad. I was feeling a bit salty yesterday. Didn’t mean to derail a fun thread. Yeah, my bad... I was reading the wrong tea leaves. Carry on

When in Rome Who did you vote for?

Yeah, no I get it. But I also think it may be a little biased of who you wanted picked. No Dugger... a couple RBs. And a mix of picks that will distribute other choices. I get the time frame, but it doesn’t seem that fair. I think anyone who is active in these forums knew the pick came down to a WR or RB, or maybe Chinn/Dugger. Yet you listed a couple RBs and only one WR in a VERY strong WR draft... this may be a little slanted to the preference of the OP. Which is fine, because it’s all for fun and anyone’s guess can be right. But I definitely believe this was done in an attempt to fulfill personal preferences.